Literature DB >> 24280180

p53 promotes the expression of gluconeogenesis-related genes and enhances hepatic glucose production.

Ido Goldstein1, Keren Yizhak, Shalom Madar, Naomi Goldfinger, Eytan Ruppin, Varda Rotter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a transcription factor that initiates transcriptional programs aimed at inhibiting carcinogenesis. p53 represses metabolic pathways that support tumor development (such as glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP)) and enhances metabolic pathways that are considered counter-tumorigenic such as fatty acid oxidation.
FINDINGS: In an attempt to comprehensively define metabolic pathways regulated by p53, we performed two consecutive high-throughput analyses in human liver-derived cells with varying p53 statuses. A gene expression microarray screen followed by constraint-based modeling (CBM) predicting metabolic changes imposed by the transcriptomic changes suggested a role for p53 in enhancing gluconeogenesis (de novo synthesis of glucose). Examining glucogenic gene expression revealed a p53-dependent induction of genes involved in both gluconeogenesis (G6PC, PCK2) and in supplying glucogenic precursors (glycerol kinase (GK), aquaporin 3 (AQP3), aquaporin 9 (AQP9) and glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1 (GOT1)). Accordingly, p53 augmented hepatic glucose production (HGP) in both human liver cells and primary mouse hepatocytes.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings portray p53 as a novel regulator of glucose production. By facilitating glucose export, p53 may prevent it from being shunted to pro-cancerous pathways such as glycolysis and the PPP. Thus, our findings suggest a metabolic pathway through which p53 may inhibit tumorigenesis.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24280180      PMCID: PMC4178212          DOI: 10.1186/2049-3002-1-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metab        ISSN: 2049-3002


Findings

p53 is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of many genes, thereby eliciting a myriad of cellular responses, most of them culminate in an anti-tumorigenic effect [1]. Recently, the concept of p53 as a regulator of metabolism has emerged with various metabolic pathways found to be regulated by p53 in an anti-tumorigenic effort [2,3]. To comprehensively describe the effect of p53 on liver-related metabolic pathways, we performed two consecutive high-throughput analyses. We evaluated the global alterations in gene expression in liver-derived HepG2 cells following two reciprocal manipulations in p53 status. First, we down-regulated p53 levels in a group of HepG2 cells by stably expressing short hairpin RNA targeting p53 (termed HepG2sh-p53) while the control group expressed a non-relevant short hairpin RNA (termed HepG2sh-con). Second, we treated the cells with Nutlin-3a, a p53-activating agent, resulting in accumulation of p53 protein levels and induction of p53-dependent transcriptional programs (Figure 1) [4]. The transcriptome of HepG2 cells under the four different conditions was analyzed using gene expression microarrays (as described in [4]). Next, we analyzed the way these p53-dependent changes in the transcriptome are predicted to affect metabolic pathways. This was done by constraint-based modeling (CBM), a widely used computational method for studying metabolism on a genome-scale, which has been successfully used for a variety of applications (Additional file 1 and [5]). Recently, two models of human metabolism were published and their potential clinical utility has been demonstrated [6,7]. The generic human models have also served as a basis for generating context-specific models including liver metabolic activities [8] and cancer metabolism [9]. We utilized a CBM method termed integrative metabolic analysis tool (iMAT), which integrates the gene expression levels measured under different conditions to predict a most-likely distribution of metabolic fluxes, accounting for post-transcriptional flux activity predicted via stochiometric considerations [10,11]. We applied iMAT to Nutlin-treated HepG2sh-con cells versus Nutlin-treated HepG2sh-p53 cells. Performing pathway enrichment analysis over the set of reactions predicted to be active in each state, we found a significant enrichment of metabolic reactions associated with gluconeogenesis in the Nutlin-treated HepG2sh-con cells (P = 0.001, after correcting for multiple hypothesis using false discovery rate (FDR) with α = 0.05), while no enrichment was found for these pathways in the Nutlin-treated HepG2sh-p53 cells (for methods summary see Additional file 2). In addition to gluconeogenesis, reactions in the fatty acid oxidation pathway were also predicted to be active in p53-expressing cells. This pathway was previously shown to be induced by p53 thus attesting to the validity of our analysis [12]. A full list of reactions predicted to be active or inactive following alterations in p53 status is presented in Additional file 2: Table S1.
Figure 1

p53 protein level is elevated in HepG2 cells following Nutlin-3a treatment. HepG2 cells were treated with the p53-activating agent Nutlin-3a (10 μM) for 24 hours, total protein was extracted and the protein level of p53 was analyzed in a western blot analysis (as described in [13]). The presented data is a representative experiment from more than three repeats.

p53 protein level is elevated in HepG2 cells following Nutlin-3a treatment. HepG2 cells were treated with the p53-activating agent Nutlin-3a (10 μM) for 24 hours, total protein was extracted and the protein level of p53 was analyzed in a western blot analysis (as described in [13]). The presented data is a representative experiment from more than three repeats. Our analyses pointed to a role for p53 in regulating gluconeogenesis (de novo synthesis of glucose). Gluconeogenesis is activated in hepatocytes when blood glucose levels diminish (due to fasting or vigorous exercise), the glucose is then secreted to the bloodstream thereby restoring glucose homeostasis. Upon a hormonal stimulus the induction of gluconeogenesis is achieved through transcriptional, post-translational and allosteric alterations in four main reactions of gluconeogenesis. These reactions are catalyzed by the following enzymes: pyruvate carboxylase (PC), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (F1,6BPase) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase). Transcriptional regulation of the genes encoding these enzymes is crucial for an effective induction of gluconeogenesis [14]. Concomitantly with these alterations, the liver is supplied with glucogenic precursors from extra-hepatic tissues, which are converted to pyruvate and enter the glucogenic pathway. The main precursors are lactate and alanine (arriving from muscles during exercise) and glycerol (arriving from adipocytes during lypolysis) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Activation of p53 is predicted to increase the flux through gluconeogenesis. The pathways supplying precursors to gluconeogenesis and the glucogenic pathway are depicted. Red arrows represent the transcriptionally-regulated reactions of gluconeogenesis. Bold arrows represent reactions predicted to carry higher flux in p53-expressing cells according to iMAT. Proteins whose genes are induced by p53 are depicted in purple rectangles. DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, G6P, glucose-6-phosphate, iMAT, integrative metabolic analysis tool; OAA, oxaloacetate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate.

Activation of p53 is predicted to increase the flux through gluconeogenesis. The pathways supplying precursors to gluconeogenesis and the glucogenic pathway are depicted. Red arrows represent the transcriptionally-regulated reactions of gluconeogenesis. Bold arrows represent reactions predicted to carry higher flux in p53-expressing cells according to iMAT. Proteins whose genes are induced by p53 are depicted in purple rectangles. DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, G6P, glucose-6-phosphate, iMAT, integrative metabolic analysis tool; OAA, oxaloacetate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate. Focusing on reactions associated with the gluconeogenesis pathway, we next evaluated the predicted flux rate carried by each of these reactions in each condition. Strikingly, three of the four regulated reactions in the gluconeogenesis pathway (catalyzed by PC, PEPCK and G6Pase) were predicted to carry higher metabolic flux in cells expressing either basal or activated p53 than in any of the other states (Figure 2 and Additional file 1: Table S1). Moreover, the shuttling of glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) from the cytosol to the endoplasmic reticulum (where G6P is dephosphorylated by G6Pase), which is essential for completion of gluconeogenesis, was predicted to carry higher metabolic flux in p53-expressing cells than in HepG2sh-p53 (Figure 2 and Additional file 1: Table S1). In light of this prediction and in an attempt to find glucogenic genes whose expression is altered in the presence and activation of p53, we examined the expression levels of several key gluconeogenesis-related genes using quantitative PCR (qPCR). The mRNA levels of G6PC (encoding the catalytic unit of G6Pase) and PCK2 (encoding mitochondrial PEPCK) were significantly elevated in Nutlin-treated HepG2sh-con cells but not in Nutlin-treated HepG2sh-p53 cells (Figure 3A). Moreover, several genes whose encoded proteins participate in supplying glucogenic precursors were elevated following Nutlin-3a treatment exclusively in HepG2sh-con (aquaporin 3 (AQP3), aquaporin 9 (AQP9), glycerol kinase (GK) and glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1 (GOT1)). Notably, most of these genes participate in the uptake and metabolism of glycerol into the glucogenic pathway following lypolysis (AQP3, AQP9 and GK; Figure 2).
Figure 3

p53 enhances gluconeogenesis-related gene expression and augments hepatic glucose production (HGP). (A) HepG2 cells were treated with the p53-activating agent Nutlin-3a (10μM) for 24 hours, total RNA was extracted and the mRNA levels of the indicated genes were analyzed in qPCR analysis (as described in [4]). The primers used for qPCR are described in Additional file 1. (B) Densely-plated HepG2 cells were incubated in glucogenic medium [15] for 24 hours. Glucose secretion to the media was measured by the glucose oxidase colorimetric method. (C) Hepatocytes were isolated and incubated in gluconeogenic medium [15] for 4 hours. Glucose secretion to the media was measured by the glucose oxidase colorimetric method. All presented data are representative experiments from at least three repeats. Each bar represents an average of three triplicates. Columns marked with asterisks denote a significant (P <0.05) elevation, measured by a student’s t-test compared to unmarked columns. qPCR, quantitative PCR.

p53 enhances gluconeogenesis-related gene expression and augments hepatic glucose production (HGP). (A) HepG2 cells were treated with the p53-activating agent Nutlin-3a (10μM) for 24 hours, total RNA was extracted and the mRNA levels of the indicated genes were analyzed in qPCR analysis (as described in [4]). The primers used for qPCR are described in Additional file 1. (B) Densely-plated HepG2 cells were incubated in glucogenic medium [15] for 24 hours. Glucose secretion to the media was measured by the glucose oxidase colorimetric method. (C) Hepatocytes were isolated and incubated in gluconeogenic medium [15] for 4 hours. Glucose secretion to the media was measured by the glucose oxidase colorimetric method. All presented data are representative experiments from at least three repeats. Each bar represents an average of three triplicates. Columns marked with asterisks denote a significant (P <0.05) elevation, measured by a student’s t-test compared to unmarked columns. qPCR, quantitative PCR. In accordance with our in silico predictions and with the p53-dependent changes in glucogenic gene expression, we found that HepG2 cells exhibit increased hepatic glucose production (HGP) following Nutlin-3a treatment (Figure 3B). Moreover, primary hepatocytes isolated from p53-deficient mice are impaired in their glucogenic capacity compared to wild-type mice (Figure 3C). In order to exclude any effects of cell viability affected by different p53 statuses on total glucose levels, we normalized the glucose level to total protein level yielding similar results (Additional file 3: Figure S1). To summarize, we found that p53 promotes the expression of genes whose encoded proteins are involved in both supplying glucogenic precursors and gluconeogenesis. Accordingly, p53 promotes glucose secretion in both human and mouse hepatocytes. In combination with gene expression analysis, the iMAT flux-prediction method can infer directionality of reactions and metabolite production capacities. iMAT treats the expression levels of enzymes as cues for the likelihood that their associated reactions carry metabolic flux. It then uses network integration to accumulate these cues into a global, consistent prediction of metabolic behavior. As such, iMAT can reveal levels of post-transcriptional regulation that are not reflected in the gene expression data. Therefore, the proteins associated with reactions predicted to carry higher flux are not necessarily regulated at the expression level and may be either regulated at the level of translation or post-translationally. Moreover, the flux through a certain reaction is calculated not only as a function of gene expression and regulation, but also with respect to the sum of reactions in the cell and is therefore affected by changes in expression of proteins not directly associated with the reaction. Thus, iMAT is a reliable predictor of metabolic fluxes [10]. By employing iMAT, we were able to find a role for p53 in enhancing gluconeogenesis. Moreover, we found that p53 induces the expression of gluconeogenesis-related genes. As a sequence-specific transcription factor, p53 mostly regulates gene expression by binding to DNA regulatory elements and enhancing transcription. In order to examine the possibility that p53 directly regulates gluconeogenesis-related genes, we utilized published data employing chromatin immunoprecipitation of p53 followed by massive parallel sequencing (ChIP-seq) [16]. The p53 binding events nearest to the genes’ transcription start site (TSS) were several tens of kilobases away from the TSS and in most cases (excluding GOT1) these binding events were closer to other genes. This certainly does not exclude the possibility that p53 regulates these genes by direct DNA binding, since it is becoming evident that a transcription factor binding event (including in the case of p53) is not necessarily responsible for regulating the gene closest to it [17,18]. Moreover, the ChIP-seq data is from non-hepatic cells which are not glucogenic and the possibility exists that the chromatin around gluconeogenesis-related genes in non-glucogenic cells is inaccessible to transcription factor binding. Another plausible scenario is that p53 regulates gluconeogenesis-related genes in an indirect manner, namely through inducing the transcription or the activity of a glucogenic transcription factor. For example, p53 was found to augment the gene-inducing activity of a known glucogenic transcription factor, glucocorticoid receptor (GR), (although the authors inspected the effect of p53 on properties of GR that are not linked to gluconeogenesis) [19]. In accordance with the computational analysis and the gene expression data, we found that p53 enhances glucose production in both human and mouse hepatocytes. Our findings are strongly supported by several published data. First, p53 induces the expression of TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator (TIGAR), which lowers the levels of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (F2,6BP), an inhibitor of gluconeogenesis [20]. Second, p53 inhibits glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), an enzyme that metabolizes G6P in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) [21]. Thus, p53 may enhance gluconeogenesis by both increasing glucogenic flux due to lower F2,6BP (resulting in higher G6P levels) and by blocking the shunting of G6P to the PPP. Third, p53 forms a complex with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC1α), leading to modulation of p53-dependent transcription [22]. The authors also measured HGP as a general indicator of liver function. p53-deficient mice showed reduced glucogenic capacity compared with wild-type mice. PGC1α is an important coactivator of gluconeogenic transcription factors [23] and the possibility exists that PGC1α directly facilitates p53-dependent gluconeogenesis-related transcription, leading to the observed improved HGP in wild-type mice. Reduced G6Pase levels are correlated to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma [24]. It has been postulated that blocking the efflux of glucose to the bloodstream leads to its shunting to other pathways which are considered pro-cancerous such as the PPP and glycolysis [25]. Thus, our finding that p53 induces G6PC expression and enhances HGP adds another layer for the metabolic regulation exerted by p53 in an effort to curtail carcinogenesis.

Availability of supporting data

The microarray results were deposited in GEO Accession Number GSE30137.

Abbreviations

AQP3: Aquaporin 3; AQP9: Aquaporin 9; CBM: Constraint-based modeling; ChIP-seq: Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing; DHAP: Dihydroxyacetone phosphate; F1,6BPase: Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase; F2,6BP: Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate; FDR: False discovery rate; G3P: Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; G6P: Glucose-6-phosphate; G6Pase: Glucose-6-phosphatase; GCPC: Glucose-6-phosphatase, catalytic subunit; G6PD: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; GK: Glycerol kinase; GOT1: Glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1; GR: Glucocorticoid receptor; sh-con: Non-relevant short hairpin RNA; sh-p53: Short hairpin RNA targeting p53; HGP: Hepatic glucose production; iMAT: Integrative metabolic analysis tool; OAA: Oxaloacetate; PC: Pyruvate carboxylase; PCK2: Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2; PEP: Phosphoenolpyruvate; PEPCK: Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; PGC1α: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha; PPP: Pentose phosphate pathway; qPCR: Quantitative PCR; TIGAR: TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator; TSS: Transcription start site.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

IG conceived the study, designed and performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. KY performed the computational analysis. SM and NG designed and performed the experiments. ER performed the computational analysis and drafted the manuscript. VR designed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Additional file 1

Detailed methods. Click here for file

Additional file 2

iMAT analysis. Click here for file

Additional file 3

Figure S1 Hepatocytes were isolated and incubated in gluconeogenic medium [15] for 4 hours. Glucose secretion to the media was measured by the glucose oxidase colorimetric method. The glucose concentration was then normalized to total protein levels. (TIFF 277 kb) Click here for file
  25 in total

1.  iMAT: an integrative metabolic analysis tool.

Authors:  Hadas Zur; Eytan Ruppin; Tomer Shlomi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data.

Authors:  Natalie C Duarte; Scott A Becker; Neema Jamshidi; Ines Thiele; Monica L Mo; Thuy D Vo; Rohith Srivas; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Stat3-mediated activation of microRNA-23a suppresses gluconeogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma by down-regulating glucose-6-phosphatase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Shu-Hao Hsu; Wendy Frankel; Kalpana Ghoshal; Samson T Jacob
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 4.  Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53.

Authors:  Karen H Vousden; Carol Prives
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Regulation of lipid metabolism by p53 - fighting two villains with one sword.

Authors:  Ido Goldstein; Varda Rotter
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 12.015

6.  p53, a novel regulator of lipid metabolism pathways.

Authors:  Ido Goldstein; Osnat Ezra; Noa Rivlin; Alina Molchadsky; Shalom Madar; Naomi Goldfinger; Varda Rotter
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Control of hepatic gluconeogenesis through the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1.

Authors:  J C Yoon; P Puigserver; G Chen; J Donovan; Z Wu; J Rhee; G Adelmant; J Stafford; C R Kahn; D K Granner; C B Newgard; B M Spiegelman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions.

Authors:  Matthew A Oberhardt; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Jason A Papin
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Insights into p53 transcriptional function via genome-wide chromatin occupancy and gene expression analysis.

Authors:  F Nikulenkov; C Spinnler; H Li; C Tonelli; Y Shi; M Turunen; T Kivioja; I Ignatiev; A Kel; J Taipale; G Selivanova
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 15.828

10.  The Edinburgh human metabolic network reconstruction and its functional analysis.

Authors:  Hongwu Ma; Anatoly Sorokin; Alexander Mazein; Alex Selkov; Evgeni Selkov; Oleg Demin; Igor Goryanin
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Gluconeogenesis in cancer cells - Repurposing of a starvation-induced metabolic pathway?

Authors:  Gabriele Grasmann; Elisabeth Smolle; Horst Olschewski; Katharina Leithner
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 2.  p53 in liver pathologies-taking the good with the bad.

Authors:  Meital Charni; Noa Rivlin; Alina Molchadsky; Ronit Aloni-Grinstein; Varda Rotter
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Long non-coding RNA H19 inhibition promotes hyperglycemia in mice by upregulating hepatic FoxO1 levels and promoting gluconeogenesis.

Authors:  Neha Goyal; Shweta Tiwary; Devesh Kesharwani; Malabika Datta
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Analysis of aquaporin expression in liver with a focus on hepatocytes.

Authors:  Françoise Gregoire; Valério Lucidi; Amal Zerrad-Saadi; Myrna Virreira; Nargis Bolaky; Valérie Delforge; Arnaud Lemmers; Vincent Donckier; Jacques Devière; Pieter Demetter; Jason Perret; Christine Delporte
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 5.  p53 in survival, death and metabolic health: a lifeguard with a licence to kill.

Authors:  Flore Kruiswijk; Christiaan F Labuschagne; Karen H Vousden
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Molecular mechanisms of leptin and pro-apoptotic signals induced by menadione in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Ebtesam Al-Suhaimi
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 7.  The role of the p53 tumor suppressor in metabolism and diabetes.

Authors:  Che-Pei Kung; Maureen E Murphy
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Tumor suppressor p53 cooperates with SIRT6 to regulate gluconeogenesis by promoting FoxO1 nuclear exclusion.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Bo Tu; Hua Wang; Ziyang Cao; Ming Tang; Chaohua Zhang; Bo Gu; Zhiming Li; Lina Wang; Yang Yang; Ying Zhao; Haiying Wang; Jianyuan Luo; Chu-Xia Deng; Bin Gao; Robert G Roeder; Wei-Guo Zhu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The Three Ds of Transcription Activation by Glucagon: Direct, Delayed, and Dynamic.

Authors:  Ido Goldstein; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 10.  Transcriptional and Chromatin Regulation during Fasting - The Genomic Era.

Authors:  Ido Goldstein; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 12.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.