Literature DB >> 33476554

Personalized Genome-Scale Metabolic Models Identify Targets of Redox Metabolism in Radiation-Resistant Tumors.

Joshua E Lewis1, Tom E Forshaw2, David A Boothman3, Cristina M Furdui2, Melissa L Kemp4.   

Abstract

Redox cofactor production is integral toward antioxidant generation, clearance of reactive oxygen species, and overall tumor response to ionizing radiation treatment. To identify systems-level alterations in redox metabolism that confer resistance to radiation therapy, we developed a bioinformatics pipeline for integrating multi-omics data into personalized genome-scale flux balance analysis models of 716 radiation-sensitive and 199 radiation-resistant tumors. These models collectively predicted that radiation-resistant tumors reroute metabolic flux to increase mitochondrial NADPH stores and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging. Simulated genome-wide knockout screens agreed with experimental siRNA gene knockdowns in matched radiation-sensitive and radiation-resistant cancer cell lines, revealing gene targets involved in mitochondrial NADPH production, central carbon metabolism, and folate metabolism that allow for selective inhibition of glutathione production and H2O2 clearance in radiation-resistant cancers. This systems approach represents a significant advancement in developing quantitative genome-scale models of redox metabolism and identifying personalized metabolic targets for improving radiation sensitivity in individual cancer patients.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NADPH; The Cancer Genome Atlas; flux balance analysis; genome-scale; glutathione; hydrogen peroxide; personalized models; radiation resistance; reactive oxygen species; redox metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33476554      PMCID: PMC7905848          DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Syst        ISSN: 2405-4712            Impact factor:   10.304


  97 in total

1.  Functional integration of a metabolic network model and expression data without arbitrary thresholding.

Authors:  Paul A Jensen; Jason A Papin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Genome scale metabolic modeling of cancer.

Authors:  Avlant Nilsson; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 9.783

3.  Relationship between in vitro growth promotion and biophysical and biochemical properties of the serum supplement.

Authors:  P J Price; E A Gregory
Journal:  In Vitro       Date:  1982-06

Review 4.  Structure, dynamics, and catalytic function of dihydrofolate reductase.

Authors:  Jason R Schnell; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2004

5.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  The energetics of mammalian cell growth.

Authors:  D G Kilburn; M D Lilly; F C Webb
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Erroneous energy-generating cycles in published genome scale metabolic networks: Identification and removal.

Authors:  Claus Jonathan Fritzemeier; Daniel Hartleb; Balázs Szappanos; Balázs Papp; Martin J Lercher
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Tracing compartmentalized NADPH metabolism in the cytosol and mitochondria of mammalian cells.

Authors:  Caroline A Lewis; Seth J Parker; Brian P Fiske; Douglas McCloskey; Dan Y Gui; Courtney R Green; Natalie I Vokes; Adam M Feist; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Christian M Metallo
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 9.  Mitochondrial metabolism and cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Ettore Porporato; Nicoletta Filigheddu; José Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 10.  DNA Damage, Repair, and Cancer Metabolism.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Turgeon; Nicholas J S Perry; George Poulogiannis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  5 in total

1.  Machine learning-guided evaluation of extraction and simulation methods for cancer patient-specific metabolic models.

Authors:  Sang Mi Lee; GaRyoung Lee; Hyun Uk Kim
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.155

2.  Targeting primary and metastatic tumor growth in an aggressive breast cancer by engineered tryptophan auxotrophic Salmonella Typhimurium.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Jawalagatti; Perumalraja Kirthika; John Hwa Lee
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.311

3.  Integration of machine learning and genome-scale metabolic modeling identifies multi-omics biomarkers for radiation resistance.

Authors:  Joshua E Lewis; Melissa L Kemp
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Is the kinetome conserved?

Authors:  Bernhard O Palsson; James T Yurkovich
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 11.429

Review 5.  Can Systems Biology Advance Clinical Precision Oncology?

Authors:  Andrea Rocca; Boris N Kholodenko
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.575

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.