Literature DB >> 25082067

The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

F Zeppernick1, I Meinhold-Heerlein.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent molecular research has revolutionized the understanding of ovarian cancer. It is now non-controversial that the term ovarian cancer summarizes a heterogenous group of malignant epithelial tumors. Findings of large clinical trials investigating surgical and systemic therapeutic approaches have defined the most important prognostic parameters. Therefore, the oncology committee of FIGO, headed by the South African gynecologic oncologist Lynette Denny, took the effort to revise the FIGO classification of ovarian cancer that was implemented in 1988.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The recent publication of Jaime Prat describing the new FIGO classification is summarized. The major changes compared to the hitherto existing classification from 1988 are presented.
RESULTS: The primary anatomy is now documented (ov for ovarian, ft for fallopian tube, p for peritoneal, X for not assessed). The histological subtype is also documented (HGSC for high-grade serous carcinoma, LGSC for low-grade serous carcinoma, MC for mucinous carcinoma, CCC for clear cell carcinoma, and EC for endometrioid carcinoma). There is no stage I peritoneal cancer. Stage IC is subdivided into intraoperative rupture (IC1), pre-operative rupture (IC2), and malignant ascites or peritoneal washings (IC3). Due to its anatomic position within the pelvis, metastasis to the sigmoid colon is considered stage II. Former stage IIC has been erased. Stage IIIA1 and IIIA2 have been defined for intra-pelvic tumor with metastasis to retro-peritoneal lymph nodes up to 1 cm (IIIA1) or larger than 1 cm (IIIA2). With this, some of the former stage IIIC cases become IIIA and some IIIB, respectively. Involvement of retroperitoneal lymph nodes must be proven cytologically or histologically. Stage IV has been subdivided into IVA (malignant pleural effusions) and IVB (parenchymal metastases and/or extra-abdominal metastases including tumors in inguinal lymph nodes or lymph nodes outside of the abdominal cavity, umbilical tumor deposit, and transmural bowel infiltration (with mucosal involvement).
CONCLUSION: The new FIGO classification takes into account the recent findings on the origin, pathogenesis, and prognosis of different ovarian cancer subtypes, summarizes groups of tumors pragmatically, and implies a reproducible and stage-dependent therapeutical approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25082067     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3364-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  57 in total

1.  BCL6 is a negative prognostic factor and exhibits pro-oncogenic activity in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Qin Wang; Mi-Die Xu; Wei-Wei Weng; Ping Wei; Yu-Si Yang; Xiang Du
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Impact of positive ZEB1 expression in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma as an oncologic outcome-predicting indicator.

Authors:  Jun Sakata; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Shiro Suzuki; Fumi Utsumi; Kaoru Niimi; Ryuichiro Sekiya; Kiyosumi Shibata; Takeshi Senga; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  The new classifications of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and their clinical implications.

Authors:  L R Duska; E C Kohn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Expression and prognostic value of matriptase in ovarian serous adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mei Ji; Shunshuang Li; Ya Xie; Zhao Zhao; Weizhong Chang; Yue Li; Xinghan Cheng; Zhuo Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Clinical significance and prognostic value of Forkhead box A1 expression in human epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Chenan Guan; Chenyan Fang; Xiaoxiao Jin; Junhui Yu; Yuquan Zhang; Lingzhi Zheng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  [TNM classification of gynecologic malignancies : What remains to be done beyond 2017?]

Authors:  L-C Horn; C E Brambs; S Opitz; J Einenkel; D Mayr
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Impact of age on clinicopathological features and survival of epithelial ovarian neoplasms in reproductive age.

Authors:  Maya Hanatani; Nobuhisa Yoshikawa; Kosuke Yoshida; Satoshi Tamauchi; Yoshiki Ikeda; Kimihiro Nishino; Kaoru Niimi; Shiro Suzuki; Michiyasu Kawai; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Downregulation of SASH1 correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Ren; Yifei Liu; Yumei Tao; Guoxiang Zhu; Meilan Pei; Jianguo Zhang; Jian Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  A Pathological Study Using 2014 WHO Criteria Reveals Poor Prognosis of Grade 3 Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinomas.

Authors:  Hiroaki Soyama; Morikazu Miyamoto; Masashi Takano; Hideki Iwahashi; Kento Kato; Takahiro Sakamoto; Mika Kuwahara; Hiroki Ishibashi; Hiroko Matuura; Tomoyuki Yoshikawa; Tadashi Aoyama; Hitoshi Tsuda; Kenichi Furuya
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 10.  [Grading of gynecological tumors : Current aspects].

Authors:  L-C Horn; D Mayr; C E Brambs; J Einenkel; I Sändig; K Schierle
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.