Literature DB >> 27379622

[Grading of gynecological tumors : Current aspects].

L-C Horn1, D Mayr2, C E Brambs3, J Einenkel4, I Sändig5, K Schierle5.   

Abstract

Histopathological assessment of the tumor grade and cell type is central to the management and prognosis of various gynecological malignancies. Conventional grading systems for squamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the vulva, vagina and cervix are poorly defined. For endometrioid tumors of the female genital tract as well as for mucinous endometrial, ovarian and seromucinous ovarian carcinomas, the 3‑tiered FIGO grading system is recommended. For uterine neuroendocrine tumors the grading system of the gastrointestinal counterparts has been adopted. Uterine leiomyosarcomas are not graded. Endometrial stromal sarcomas are divided into low and high grades, based on cellular morphology, immunohistochemical and molecular findings. A chemotherapy response score was established for chemotherapeutically treated high-grade serous pelvic cancer. For non-epithelial ovarian malignancies, only Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors and immature teratomas are graded. At this time molecular profiling has no impact on the grading of tumors of the female genital tract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial cancer; Molecular pathology; Neuroendocrine malignancies; Ovarian cancer; Sertoli Leydig cell tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27379622     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-016-0183-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  117 in total

1.  Interobserver variability in the application of a proposed histologic subclassification of endocervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Cherie Paquette; Susanne K Jeffus; Charles M Quick; Mark R Conaway; Mark H Stoler; Kristen A Atkins
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  An analysis of two versus three grades for endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  R R Taylor; J Zeller; R W Lieberman; D M O'Connor
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis.

Authors:  W Glenn McCluggage
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.306

4.  Immature teratoma of the ovary: a clinicopathological study of 28 cases.

Authors:  Kedar K Deodhar; Pallavi Suryawanshi; Milap Shah; Bharat Rekhi; R F Chinoy
Journal:  Indian J Pathol Microbiol       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.740

5.  Tumor size, depth of invasion, and grading of the invasive tumor front are the main prognostic factors in early squamous cell cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  G B Kristensen; V M Abeler; B Risberg; C Trop; M Bryne
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth versus uterine carcinosarcoma: comparison of treatment and survival.

Authors:  T C Krivak; J D Seidman; J W McBroom; P J MacKoul; L M Aye; G S Rose
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  WT1 is differentially expressed in serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous carcinomas of the peritoneum, fallopian tube, ovary, and endometrium.

Authors:  Geza Acs; Theresa Pasha; Paul J Zhang
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  POSTN/TGFBI-associated stromal signature predicts poor prognosis in serous epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Beth Y Karlan; Judy Dering; Christine Walsh; Sandra Orsulic; Jenny Lester; Lee A Anderson; Charles L Ginther; Marlena Fejzo; Dennis Slamon
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors. A clinicopathological analysis of 207 cases.

Authors:  R H Young; R E Scully
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Prognostic features of surgical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Sarah E Ferguson; Carmen Tornos; Amanda Hummer; Richard R Barakat; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Revised German guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix-what's new for pathologists in 2021?]

Authors:  Lars-Christian Horn; Matthias W Beckmann; Markus Follmann; Martin C Koch; Monika Nothacker; Birgit Pöschel; Frederik Stübs; Dietmar Schmidt; Anne Kathrin Höhn
Journal:  Pathologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 2.  [TNM classification of gynecologic malignancies : What remains to be done beyond 2017?]

Authors:  L-C Horn; C E Brambs; S Opitz; J Einenkel; D Mayr
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.011

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.