Literature DB >> 31541363

Impact of age on clinicopathological features and survival of epithelial ovarian neoplasms in reproductive age.

Maya Hanatani1, Nobuhisa Yoshikawa2, Kosuke Yoshida1, Satoshi Tamauchi1, Yoshiki Ikeda1, Kimihiro Nishino1, Kaoru Niimi1, Shiro Suzuki1, Michiyasu Kawai3, Hiroaki Kajiyama1, Fumitaka Kikkawa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effect of age on the prognosis of epithelial ovarian neoplasms. In the reproductive age, fertility-sparing surgery had been widely implemented. This study aimed to elucidate impact of age on the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of epithelial ovarian neoplasms in the reproductive age.
METHODS: The clinical records of patients diagnosed as epithelial ovarian cancer or epithelial borderline ovarian tumor at the age of 40 years or younger at multiple institutions in the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were stratified into two age groups: group A (≤ 30 years) and group B (31-40 years). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival and disease-free survival.
RESULTS: A total of 583 patients (325 patients: cancer, 258 patients: borderline) were included. The median follow-up time was 62.0 months (range 1-270 months). Compared with group B, group A had a significantly higher rate of borderline tumor (66.7% vs. 32.7%, p < 0.001); stage I disease (85.9% vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001); mucinous type (69.2% vs. 35.6%, p < 0.001); conservative surgery (83.8% vs. 41.6%, p < 0.001); no adjuvant chemotherapy (67.2% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001); and CA125 ≤ 35 U/mL (39.4% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the overall survival (p = 0.0051) and the disease-free survival (p = 0.0039) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that the independent prognostic factors for the overall survival were age, stage, histology, and ascitic fluid cytology.
CONCLUSION: In epithelial ovarian neoplasms, younger patients had a survival advantage over older patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age group; Epithelial ovarian cancer; Fertility preservations; Ovarian neoplasm; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31541363     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01550-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  30 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  The Factors Predicting Recurrence in Patients With Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumor.

Authors:  Isin Ureyen; Alper Karalok; Tolga Tasci; Osman Turkmen; Nurettin Boran; Gokhan Tulunay; Taner Turan
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Are DNA ploidy and epidermal growth factor receptor prognostic factors for untreated ovarian cancer? A prospective study.

Authors:  N Nagai; T Oshita; T Fujii; Y Katsube; S Matsubayashi; K Ohama
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.339

4.  Survival differences of Asian and Caucasian epithelial ovarian cancer patients in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine C Fuh; Jacob Y Shin; Daniel S Kapp; Rebecca A Brooks; Stefanie Ueda; Renata R Urban; Lee-May Chen; John K Chan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  F Zeppernick; I Meinhold-Heerlein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Fertility preservation in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Monjri Shah; Leny Mathew; William M Burke; Jennifer Culhane; Noah Goldman; Peter B Schiff; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Long-term survival of young women receiving fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian cancer in comparison with those undergoing radical surgery.

Authors:  H Kajiyama; K Shibata; M Mizuno; T Umezu; S Suzuki; A Nawa; M Kawai; T Nagasaka; F Kikkawa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Ovarian cancer in younger vs older women: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  J K Chan; R Urban; M K Cheung; K Osann; J Y Shin; A Husain; N N Teng; D S Kapp; J S Berek; G S Leiserowitz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Treatment reality in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective analysis of the OVCAD consortium.

Authors:  Fabian Trillsch; Linn Woelber; Christine Eulenburg; Ioana Braicu; Sandrina Lambrechts; Radoslav Chekerov; Els van Nieuwenhuysen; Paul Speiser; Alain Zeimet; Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong; Nicole Concin; Robert Zeillinger; Ignace Vergote; Sven Mahner; Jalid Sehouli
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.234

10.  Fertility sparing surgery in patients with early stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implication of survival analysis and lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kajiyama
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.401

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Nomogram Based on SEER Database for Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Mucinous Ovarian Cancer: A Real-World Study.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Songwei Feng; Yu Ge; Bo Ding; Yang Shen
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-26

2.  A Practical Nomogram to Predict Early Death in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Zixuan Song; Yangzi Zhou; Xue Bai; Dandan Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Develop a nomogram to predict overall survival of patients with borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Xiao-Qin Gong; Yan Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 1.337

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.