Literature DB >> 25077557

Molecular features of product release for the PKA catalytic cycle.

Adam C Bastidas1, Jian Wu, Susan S Taylor.   

Abstract

Although ADP release is the rate limiting step in product turnover by protein kinase A, the steps and motions involved in this process are not well resolved. Here we report the apo and ADP bound structures of the myristylated catalytic subunit of PKA at 2.9 and 3.5 Å resolution, respectively. The ADP bound structure adopts a conformation that does not conform to the previously characterized open, closed, or intermediate states. In the ADP bound structure, the C-terminal tail and Gly-rich loop are more closed than in the open state adopted in the apo structure but are also much more open than the intermediate or closed conformations. Furthermore, ADP binds at the active site with only one magnesium ion, termed Mg2 from previous structures. These structures thus support a model where ADP release proceeds through release of the substrate and Mg1 followed by lifting of the Gly-rich loop and disengagement of the C-terminal tail. Coupling of these two structural elements with the release of the first metal ion fills in a key step in the catalytic cycle that has been missing and supports an ensemble of correlated conformational states that mediate the full catalytic cycle for a protein kinase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25077557      PMCID: PMC4295794          DOI: 10.1021/bi500684c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


Protein kinases are an important family of enzymes that govern many signaling processes within cells by transferring the γ-phosphate of ATP onto a substrate protein. The addition of a phosphate group produces large and diverse effects on the modified proteins but is often associated with activating or inhibiting a cellular process. Because of the vast importance of protein kinases in cellular processes, dysfunctional kinase signaling can lead to several diseases including cancer.[1] Protein kinases are thus important drug targets, and better understanding of kinase structure, function, and catalysis will advance our strategies for drug targeting. cAMP-dependent protein kinase, also called protein kinase A (PKA), is one of the most well-studied protein kinases, and because of the high conservation of the protein kinase family, it serves as a model for all protein kinases.[2] Under nonactivating conditions, PKA exists as a heterotetrameric holoenzyme complex composed of a regulatory (R) subunit dimer that binds and inhibits two catalytic (C) subunit monomers. PKA is activated by cAMP, which binds to the R-subunits and releases the inhibition of the C-subunits.[3] Once released from R-subunit inhibition, the active C-subunits can phosphorylate target proteins at membranes, in the cytoplasm, and in the nucleus. In many cases, PKA is targeted to a specific site where it is dedicated to the regulation of a colocalized protein. The C-subunit of PKA was the first kinase structure solved,[4] and this structure defined the bilobal architecture that is shared by all protein kinases. These lobes were termed the N-lobe (or small lobe) and C-lobe (or large lobe). Many subsequent crystal structures defined the wide range of conformations adopted by the dynamic protein kinases. The C-subunit has been crystallized in several states termed “open,” “closed,” and “intermediate” based on the relative orientation of the N- and C-lobes. The open conformation adopts the largest distance between the N- and C-lobe and was observed with the apo C-subunit and with the C-subunit bound to an inhibitor peptide IP20.[5,6] The closed conformation displays tight packing between the N-lobe and the C-lobe, which causes a closing of the active site cleft and the exclusion of water, and this conformation is typically seen when the protein is crystallized with IP20 and ATP or ATP analogues.[7] A representative intermediate conformation was observed when the C-subunit was crystallized with adenosine;[8] however, there is clearly an ensemble of intermediate conformations. These crystal structures, as well as NMR data,[9] demonstrate that the C-subunit adopts a wide ensemble of conformations, and these dynamics and conformations contribute to the regulation of enzyme activity. The kinetics and phosphoryl transfer reaction by PKA are also well-characterized, and these studies have improved our understanding of kinase reaction progression.[10] Pre-steady-state and steady-state kinetics of PKA showed that phosphoryl transfer of the γ-phosphate of ATP onto the substrate is a very rapid event; it is other processes that govern the rate of the reaction. These rate-limiting steps are also regulated by magnesium ion.[11] Most protein kinases, including PKA, require magnesium to bind ATP and catalyze phosphoryl transfer under physiological conditions. At low magnesium concentration (0.5 mM), PKA has a higher turnover rate than at high magnesium concentration (10 mM), and at the low magnesium concentration, the turnover rate is governed partially by ADP release and partially by conformational changes that occur before and after phosphoryl transfer.[12−14] At high magnesium ion concentrations, the PKA reaction rate is governed by ADP release[11,15,16] and the conformational changes that are associated with ADP release. Therefore, ADP release is one of the most important steps in PKA reaction turnover and is highly influenced by the magnesium ions. PKA binds two magnesium ions, which were termed Mg1 and Mg2. Mg1 binds in a bidentate manner with Asp184 of the “DFG” motif as well as the β- and γ-phosphates of ATP. Mg2 coordinates with one oxygen atom of Asp184, with Asn171, and with the α- and γ-phosphates of ATP.[17,18] Each magnesium ion also binds water molecules to fulfill an octahedral coordination state.[19] The nomenclature of these magnesium ions as Mg1 and Mg2 was made based on an older crystal structure that reported electron density for mostly one magnesium ion when the C-subunit was crystallized with a low concentration of magnesium.[18] The ion that showed more electron density was thus termed Mg1 because it was thought to bind first or more strongly with ATP, and the other ion was termed Mg2. Despite this nomenclature, recent studies suggest that the designation of the two Mg ions most likely does not correlate with the order in which they bind. Another crystal structure of the C-subunit obtained under low magnesium concentration shows electron density for only one magnesium ion, but the ion observed in the crystal structure corresponds to the Mg2 ion.[20] Furthermore, other protein kinases such as CDK2 often crystallize with one magnesium ion, and the ion observed is analogous to Mg2.[21] Finally, separate crystal structure studies of reaction progression by PKA and CDK2 both identify Mg2 as the ion that likely remains in the active site following phosphoryl transfer while Mg1 is lost, suggesting that Mg2 may be the more stably bound ion.[22,23] In contrast, loss of Mg1 may be an important part of the rate-limiting step of ADP release and may explain the slower turnover rate at high magnesium concentration due to continued occupancy of both metal binding sites. To further elucidate reaction progression by PKA and the conformations involved in the reaction trajectory, we obtained the first crystal structure of the C-subunit bound only to ADP by soaking apo crystals with ADP and magnesium. No crystal structures of the C-subunit bound only to ATP or ADP were previously solved because the inhibitor peptide, IP20, is generally necessary to crystallize PKA with nucleotide. There is a structure of the C-subunit bound only to adenosine.[8] However, adenosine lacks the phosphate groups, and therefore, it lacks information about the magnesium ions and lacks information on reaction turnover since adenosine is not a naturally bound product. Here we report the apo structure of the C-subunit refined to 2.9 Å resolution and the ADP bound structure refined to 3.5 Å resolution. The ADP bound structure supports previous findings that ADP binds with Mg2. Also, the ADP bound structure adopts a conformation that does not conform to the “open”, “closed”, or previously solved “intermediate” states, and therefore, the structure further defines the conformational flexibility of the protein and provides insights into the motions and mechanisms that may govern ADP release. These structures highlight in particular the dynamic nature of the C-tail and show how its motions and functions are correlated with the Gly-rich loop. Both motifs are highly ordered and linked in the closed conformation. In the ADP bound structure, the C-tail is disordered, the Gly-rich loop is open, and the two motifs are not coupled. The order–disorder transition of the C-tail and its role in the recruitment and release of nucleotides from the active site is clearly highlighted in the ensemble of structures described here.

Materials and Methods

Purification of the Myristylated C-Subunit Protein

The myristylated K7C C-subunit was prepared by coexpression with yeast NMT as described previously[24] and purified following a method described previously.[25] The K7C mutant was used for crystallization because it increases the yield of the myristylated protein. The myristylated protein was used for crystallization because the apo structure was initially obtained to characterize the role of N-myristylation in PKA structure.

Crystallization and ADP Soaking

The apo myristylated K7C C-subunit crystallized under similar conditions utilized for the previous apo WT nonmyristylated C-subunit structure.[5] The protein was dialyzed overnight into 50 mM bicine, 150 mM ammonium acetate, 10 mM DTT, pH 8.0. Then the protein was concentrated to approximately 8–10 mg/mL. The protein was setup for crystallization using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method at 4 °C. The protein was screened against different well solutions with 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol (MPD) concentrations ranging from 2% to 18% and with 9–13% methanol added to the well solution immediately before sealing the well. The crystals were obtained using 8 μL drops of 1:1 volume of protein solution to well solution. Crystals typically appeared in 1–2 months, unlike the previous apo C-subunit structure, which reported crystal appearance in 6–12 months.[5] The apo myristylated K7C C-subunit structure was obtained from a crystal grown with a well solution containing 8% MPD and 9% MeOH added to the well. The protein crystallized contained two sites of phosphorylation on Thr197 and Ser338. Attempts to cocrystallize the C-subunit with ADP were unsuccessful. Therefore, in order to obtain an ADP bound structure, the apo crystals were soaked with ADP and MgCl2. A solution of ADP and MgCl2 was prepared in 0.1 M Tris buffer at pH 7.0 and added to the crystal drop to yield a final drop concentration of approximately 5 mM ADP and 5 mM MgCl2. The crystals were allowed to soak for 24–48 h before being harvested and flash frozen. The structure reported here was obtained from a crystal soaked with ADP/MgCl2 for 48 h.

Data Collection and Refinement

The crystals were flash cooled in liquid nitrogen with cryoprotectant solution (16% MPD and 15% glycerol). Data was collected on the synchrotron beamline 8.2.1 of the Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories (Berkeley, California). The crystal structures were integrated using iMOSFLM.[26] The protein crystallized in the P21 space group as with the previous apo structure. Molecular replacement was carried out using Phaser[27] with the previously solved apo C-subunit structure, PDB ID 1J3H,[5] as a search model for the apo structure and with the apo structure solved here as the search model for the ADP bound structure. The refinement was performed using refmac5,[28] and model building was done in Coot.[29] Refinement was performed using a TLS and restrained refinement along with noncrystallographic symmetry (NCS) restraints. The TLS groups and NCS restraints used corresponded to the small lobe (residues 10–126 and 327–350) and large lobe (residues 127–326). The apo and ADP bound structures were refined to Rwork/Rfree of 24.4%/29.2% and 22.7%/28.4%, respectively. The data collection and refinement statistics are shown in Table 1 with Ramachandran values as defined in MolProbity.[30]
Table 1

Crystallography Data Collection and Refinement Statisticsa

 apoADP bound
PDB ID4NTS4NTT
space groupP21P21
cell dimensions  
a (Å)50.9650.48
b (Å)142.61143.15
c (Å)63.1662.57
α, β, γ (deg)90, 103.61, 9090, 103.61, 90
unique reflections19,014 (2,818)10,660 (1,572)
multiplicity3.1 (3.1)2.7 (2.7)
resolution range (Å)61.38–2.90 (3.06–2.90)b32.15–3.50 (3.69–3.50)b
Rmerge (%)5.1 (44.1)10.5 (48.6)
II)9.7 (2.1)5.7 (2.4)
completeness (%)97.7 (99.0)97.5 (98.4)
Rwork/Rfree (%)c24.4/29.222.7/28.4
   
avg temp factors (B factors) for all atoms (Å2), chain A/chain B  
all residues72.2/69.0103.2/99.7
N-lobe (residues 1–126)72.1/77.8104.3/104.4
C-lobe (residues 127–300)65.2/55.197.3/91.2
C-tail (residues 301–350)96.2/96.6121.4/118.5
near FDDY (residues 320–335)117.2/134.4133.9/130.5
ADPNA161.8/124.2
magnesiumNA62.2/78.8
Ramachandran angles (%)d  
favored regions93.6691.54
allowed regions100100
rms deviations  
bond lengths (Å)0.0060.007
bond angles (deg)1.0131.114

Data collection was performed at ALS laboratory in Berkeley, CA on beamline 8.2.1.

Values in parentheses correspond to the highest resolution shell.

To calculate the Rfree, 5% of the data was excluded from the refinement .

Ramachandran plot quality as defined in MolProbity.[30]

Data collection was performed at ALS laboratory in Berkeley, CA on beamline 8.2.1. Values in parentheses correspond to the highest resolution shell. To calculate the Rfree, 5% of the data was excluded from the refinement . Ramachandran plot quality as defined in MolProbity.[30]

PDB Deposition

The coordinates and structure factors for the apo and ADP bound structures were deposited into the RCSB PDB with accession codes of 4NTS and 4NTT, respectively.

Results

Apo C-Subunit Structure

The myristylated C-subunit of PKA was crystallized in an apo state to determine any effects of myristylation in the absence of ligands. A K7C mutant was crystallized because it increases the yield of the myristylated protein.[25] The apo crystal structure was refined at 2.9 Å resolution (Table 1, Figure 1A). There is electron density for myristic acid in one of the two molecules in the asymmetric unit (ASU); however, there is density for only 4 of the 14 carbon atoms of myristic acid (Figure 1B). The lack of electron density for myristic acid implies that the myristic acid group binding within the hydrophobic pocket could be involved in forming a closed state since there is more electron density for the myristic acid group in structures that adopt a closed conformation, particularly in the binary complex that contains only peptide, compared with the open conformation adopted here in an apo state.[25] The lack of density likely reflects high flexibility or disorder of the myristyl group, and this flexibility may correlate with different steps of the catalytic cycle.
Figure 1

Apo structure of the catalytic subunit of PKA. (A) The overall apo structure is displayed in ribbon representation with chain A colored gray and chain B colored olive and with chains A and B aligned by the entire protein. (B) (left) The myristic acid binding pocket for chains A and B, which are colored as in panel A, is displayed along with the 2Fo – Fc electron density at 1σ shown in blue for the myristic acid group from chain A. There is no electron density for myristic acid in chain B. (right) In contrast, the 2Fo – Fc electron density at 1σ is visible for the entire myristic acid group in the closed state (4DFX).[25] (C) The 2Fo – Fc electron density at 1σ is shown in blue for the C-terminal tail of chains A and B.

Apo structure of the catalytic subunit of PKA. (A) The overall apo structure is displayed in ribbon representation with chain A colored gray and chain B colored olive and with chains A and B aligned by the entire protein. (B) (left) The myristic acid binding pocket for chains A and B, which are colored as in panel A, is displayed along with the 2Fo – Fc electron density at 1σ shown in blue for the myristic acid group from chain A. There is no electron density for myristic acid in chain B. (right) In contrast, the 2Fo – Fc electron density at 1σ is visible for the entire myristic acid group in the closed state (4DFX).[25] (C) The 2Fo – Fc electron density at 1σ is shown in blue for the C-terminal tail of chains A and B. The overall structure of the myristylated apo C-subunit reported here is in an open conformation similar to the previous WT nonmyristylated apo structure (1J3H).[5] There are two molecules in the ASU that are similar to each other with an RMSD of 0.66 Å between chain A and chain B when aligned by the whole protein (Figure 1A). The structure is very similar to the previous apo structure with a few differences. For example, the Cys199 residue was modified with β-mercaptoethanol in the previous apo structure and is unmodified in this structure. This caused some small shifts in the residues at the activation loop in the structure reported here compared with the previous structure, and the position of the residues in this structure are more likely to represent the native apo conformation since modification of Cys199 renders the C-subunit inactive.[31] Furthermore, the previous structure showed electron density for 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol (MPD) in the myristic acid pocket, but since our structures used the myristylated protein, instead there is electron density that corresponds to the myristic acid group in chain A and no electron density in the myristic acid pocket in chain B. Finally, the C-tail was not modeled in the previous apo structure due to lack of electron density. Although the electron density of the C-tail in this structure is also very poor with little density for residues 318–330 in both molecules, we did model the C-tail into the structure. However, the C-tail is still not well resolved, the temperature factors are very high, and there is also no clear density for the side chains (Table 1, Figure 1C). The modeled C-tail should be interpreted as showing the tentative location of the backbone of this region of the protein. The fact that the C-tail is disordered may cause disordering of other regions in the apo protein. The side chain of Arg56 is disordered here, whereas in the closed conformation this arginine interacts with Glu333 in the C-tail. This arginine is one link between the C-tail and the Gly-rich loop, and this communication is lost in the apo conformation when the C-tail becomes disordered. Although the apo structure did not show enhanced stability of the myristylated N-terminus nor show large differences compared with the previous apo structure, it did allow us to ask about ADP binding and release since this has been a key missing step in the reaction pathway.

Overall ADP Bound C-Subunit Structure

The ADP bound structure of the C-subunit was obtained by soaking apo crystals with Mg/ADP and was refined to 3.5 Å resolution (Table 1). The overall ADP bound structure is most similar to the apo structure with an RMSD of 0.74 Å between the apo and ADP bound structures aligned by the entire protein using both molecules in the ASU. The two molecules in the ASU of the ADP bound structure are similar to each other with RMSD values between chain A and chain B for the overall protein of 0.61 Å. ADP and one magnesium ion are present in both molecules in the asymmetric unit (Figure 2). The main differences between chain A and chain B occur at the Gly-rich loop and C-terminal tail.
Figure 2

ADP bound structure of the C-subunit of PKA. The overall ADP bound structure of the C-subunit is displayed in ribbon representation with chain A colored gray and chain B colored cyan, and the two molecules from the asymmetric unit are aligned by the entire protein. ADP from each molecule is displayed in stick representation and colored by element, Asn171 and Asp184 that bind to the magnesium are displayed in stick representation and colored by element, and the magnesium ion is colored by chain and displayed in sphere representation.

ADP bound structure of the C-subunit of PKA. The overall ADP bound structure of the C-subunit is displayed in ribbon representation with chain A colored gray and chain B colored cyan, and the two molecules from the asymmetric unit are aligned by the entire protein. ADP from each molecule is displayed in stick representation and colored by element, Asn171 and Asp184 that bind to the magnesium are displayed in stick representation and colored by element, and the magnesium ion is colored by chain and displayed in sphere representation. As with the apo structure, the electron density of the C-terminal tail is not strong, but there was enough electron density to model the approximate location of the peptide backbone. Also, the C-terminal tail typically forms part of the adenine binding pocket when the C-subunit is bound to nucleotide. In chain B, there was some positive electron density in the region that Phe327 and Tyr330 typically occupy when bound to nucleotide without the C-tail modeled, and there is some electron density with the C-tail modeled with the residue side-chains at this location using omit maps. Therefore, the side chains of these amino acid residues are modeled in the structure for chain B and show how these two aromatic side chains bind ADP (Figure 3A). Mutagenesis of either of these residues leads to severe defects in activity.[32−34] In chain A, the C-tail does not form part of the binding site, and this is due most likely to close crystal packing at the C-tail with a symmetry related molecule (Figure 3A,B). Another difference between chain A and chain B is the conformation of the Gly-rich loop. Residues 50–53 are much lower in chain A than chain B, especially Ser53. It is possible that Ser53 helps to bind to ADP more in chain A than chain B because of the lack of the C-tail forming part of the binding site (Figure 3C).
Figure 3

Changes at the C-terminal tail and Gly-rich loop in the ADP bound structure. (A) The 2Fo – Fc electron density at 1σ is displayed in blue for the C-terminal tail of chain B from the ADP bound structure, and the resulting Fo – Fc electron density map contoured to 2.5σ is displayed in green for the C-tail from chain B when the C-terminal tail is excluded from the final model of the structure. (B) Chain A, gray, and chain B, olive, are displayed is ribbon representation and aligned by the entire protein. A symmetry related molecule near the C-terminal tail of chain A is displayed in black transparent cartoon representation showing that crystal packing prevents chain A from adopting the C-tail conformation adopted by chain B. (C) The apo structure, the ADP bound structure, and a ternary structure, 1RDQ,[7] were aligned by the entire protein, and the location of the Gly-rich loop from each structure following this alignment is displayed.

Changes at the C-terminal tail and Gly-rich loop in the ADP bound structure. (A) The 2Fo – Fc electron density at 1σ is displayed in blue for the C-terminal tail of chain B from the ADP bound structure, and the resulting Fo – Fc electron density map contoured to 2.5σ is displayed in green for the C-tail from chain B when the C-terminal tail is excluded from the final model of the structure. (B) Chain A, gray, and chain B, olive, are displayed is ribbon representation and aligned by the entire protein. A symmetry related molecule near the C-terminal tail of chain A is displayed in black transparent cartoon representation showing that crystal packing prevents chain A from adopting the C-tail conformation adopted by chain B. (C) The apo structure, the ADP bound structure, and a ternary structure, 1RDQ,[7] were aligned by the entire protein, and the location of the Gly-rich loop from each structure following this alignment is displayed. ADP and one magnesium ion are present at the active site in both molecules in the ASU, and there is strong electron density to validate their presence (Figure 4). Before ADP and magnesium were included in the structure, there was strong positive electron density for ADP/Mg in both molecules in the ASU, and the final electron density for ADP/Mg, as modeled, is convincing (Figure 4). However, the electron density is better in chain B than in chain A, and correspondingly, the B-factor values are higher for the ADP/Mg in chain A than chain B (Table 1). It is possible that the better electron density in chain B is because the C-tail can form part of the ADP binding pocket in chain B but not chain A. Therefore, this adds credence to the importance of these residues for binding to nucleotide, which was also verified with mutagenesis previously[32−34] and with hydrogendeuterium exchange coupled to mass spectrometry measured with the C-subunit bound to ADP.[35]
Figure 4

Electron density for ADP from each molecule in the asymmetric unit. The Fo – Fc electron density at 3σ from the first refinement of the ADP bound structure without ADP or magnesium modeled into the structure is displayed for chains A and B (top), and the 2Fo – Fc electron density of the final model contoured to 1σ is displayed for each chain (bottom).

Electron density for ADP from each molecule in the asymmetric unit. The Fo – Fc electron density at 3σ from the first refinement of the ADP bound structure without ADP or magnesium modeled into the structure is displayed for chains A and B (top), and the 2Fo – Fc electron density of the final model contoured to 1σ is displayed for each chain (bottom). Despite binding to ADP, the C-subunit still adopts a largely open conformation. The Gly-rich loop is still raised much more than the closed state, although it is lowered compared with the apo state (Figure 5A,B). Similarly, the C-terminal tail forms part of the binding site for ADP in chain B, but the C-tail does not close down onto the active site to the same extent in the ADP bound structure as it does in the closed state (Figure 5A–C). Therefore, the ADP bound structure adopts a conformation that does not conform to any of the previously identified states, open, closed, or intermediate. This fact is further illustrated by examining different distances between residues or regions of the protein that characterize the different states (Table 2). These distances are different in the ADP bound structure than in the open, closed, or intermediate states. Therefore, the ADP bound structure displays a new conformation of the C-subunit that could represent a conformation involved in ADP release. Additionally, there are differences in each molecule in the ASU suggesting that these could represent an ensemble of intermediate states during ADP release.
Figure 5

ADP bound structure adopts a unique conformation. (A) A stereoview of the apo structure reported here is displayed in surface representation with the N-lobe (residues 1–126) colored gray, large lobe (residues 127–300) colored olive, and C-tail (residues 301–350) colored red. Chain B from the ADP bound structure and a ternary structure, 1RDQ,[7] are aligned with the apo structure by the entire protein. The C-tail and Gly-rich loop from the ADP bound structure are colored blue and shown in ribbon representation, and the C-tail and Gly-rich loop from the ternary structure are colored black and displayed in ribbon representation. The inhibitor peptide, IP20, from the ternary structure is colored cyan and shown in ribbon representation. (B) A stereoview of chain B from the ADP bound structure is displayed in surface representation with the regions of the protein colored as in panel A. The C-tail and Gly-rich loop from the ternary structure, 1RDQ, aligned with the ADP bound structure by the entire protein are shown in ribbon representation and colored blue. IP20 is depicted as in panel A. (C) The dynamic nature of the C-tail. The ADP bound structure, colored red, adopts a conformation that does not conform to the open state colored olive, or the closed state colored gray. The residues Phe327 and Tyr330 are displayed in surface representation which are important for ATP binding, colored black.

Table 2

Distances within the C-Subunit That Define Different Conformationsa

conformation:ADP bound (chain A/B)openintermediateclosedclosedclosed
peptidenoneIP20noneIP20IP20IP20
nucleotideADPnoneadenosineATPnoneAMP-PNP
PDB ID4NTT1CTP1BKX1ATP1APM1CDK
His87–Thr197 (N-PO4)6.7/6.37.13.22.72.82.8
Glu170–Tyr330 (backbone C=O–OH)NA/12.314.68.68.28.27.9

Adapted from Johnson et al.[2]

ADP bound structure adopts a unique conformation. (A) A stereoview of the apo structure reported here is displayed in surface representation with the N-lobe (residues 1–126) colored gray, large lobe (residues 127–300) colored olive, and C-tail (residues 301–350) colored red. Chain B from the ADP bound structure and a ternary structure, 1RDQ,[7] are aligned with the apo structure by the entire protein. The C-tail and Gly-rich loop from the ADP bound structure are colored blue and shown in ribbon representation, and the C-tail and Gly-rich loop from the ternary structure are colored black and displayed in ribbon representation. The inhibitor peptide, IP20, from the ternary structure is colored cyan and shown in ribbon representation. (B) A stereoview of chain B from the ADP bound structure is displayed in surface representation with the regions of the protein colored as in panel A. The C-tail and Gly-rich loop from the ternary structure, 1RDQ, aligned with the ADP bound structure by the entire protein are shown in ribbon representation and colored blue. IP20 is depicted as in panel A. (C) The dynamic nature of the C-tail. The ADP bound structure, colored red, adopts a conformation that does not conform to the open state colored olive, or the closed state colored gray. The residues Phe327 and Tyr330 are displayed in surface representation which are important for ATP binding, colored black. Adapted from Johnson et al.[2]

Mg Binding Site and Implications on Reaction Progression

There is only one magnesium ion present in the ADP bound structure unlike typical PKA ternary structures, which display two magnesium ions at the active site.[7] The magnesium ion at the active site in the ADP bound structure corresponds to Mg2. Although the location of the magnesium ion does not exactly match the typical position of Mg2, the magnesium ion is clearly situated between Asp184 and Asn171, which would correspond to the Mg2 ion (Figure 6A). To further verify that the magnesium ion is modeled correctly and corresponds to Mg2, the magnesium ion was removed from the final model of the structure, which was then refined. The corresponding Fo – Fc map shows strong positive electron density at the site where the magnesium ion was modeled, and again, the site corresponds to Mg2 based on its location between Asp184 and Asn171 (Figure 6B). Therefore, Mg2 is the ion that binds more strongly with ADP and verifies previous studies suggesting that Mg1 is lost following phosphoryl transfer.[22,23]
Figure 6

ADP binds at the active site with Mg2. (A) The active site of chain B from the ADP bound structure is displayed in cartoon representation with ADP displayed in stick representation and magnesium displayed in sphere representation. The side chain of Asn171 and Asp184, which chelate the magnesium ions, are displayed in stick representation. (B) The resulting Fo – Fc electron density map obtained by omitting the magnesium ion from the final ADP bound structure is displayed contoured to 3σ showing strong positive electron density at the Mg2 site with no density for the Mg1 site. The ternary structure, 1RDQ,[7] colored olive was aligned by the entire protein to the ADP bound structure to illustrate the location of Asn171, Asp184, ATP, and the magnesium ions from the ternary structure.

ADP binds at the active site with Mg2. (A) The active site of chain B from the ADP bound structure is displayed in cartoon representation with ADP displayed in stick representation and magnesium displayed in sphere representation. The side chain of Asn171 and Asp184, which chelate the magnesium ions, are displayed in stick representation. (B) The resulting Fo – Fc electron density map obtained by omitting the magnesium ion from the final ADP bound structure is displayed contoured to 3σ showing strong positive electron density at the Mg2 site with no density for the Mg1 site. The ternary structure, 1RDQ,[7] colored olive was aligned by the entire protein to the ADP bound structure to illustrate the location of Asn171, Asp184, ATP, and the magnesium ions from the ternary structure.

Discussion

The apo and ADP bound structures provide several insights into PKA structure, conformational dynamics, and reaction progression. Although the myristylated apo structure presented here is similar to the previous apo structure,[5] it provides important new information. For instance, the myristic acid group is more disengaged from the enzyme in an apo state than in the ligand bound states based on very little or no electron density for the myristic acid group for chain A and chain B, respectively. This lack of density suggests that the myristyl moiety is disordered in an apo state and may become more ordered or more tightly anchored to the protein in the presence of ligands. Comparing the apo state to the ADP bound structure also highlights the disorder to order transition of the C-tail, which coordinates with many other regions of the protein. The C-tail and Gly-rich loop are tightly coupled to ligand binding and are better resolved and more tightly coupled together in the presence of ligands. Finally, the ADP bound structure provides a glimpse into the motions and steps that may govern reaction progression by PKA and likely many, if not all, protein kinases. The ADP bound structure displays one magnesium ion bound at the active site that corresponds to Mg2, which is situated between Asp184 of the DFG motif and Asn171 (Figure 6A,B). This structure suggests that PKA binds ADP with Mg2, and therefore, Mg1 must be released following phosphoryl transfer. This mode of reaction progression was seen previously in both CDK2 and PKA.[22,23] Crystal structures showed that ADP can bind with one or two magnesium ions at the active site of PKA or CDK2, and if only one magnesium ion is bound, the ion corresponds to Mg2. Release of Mg1 is therefore hypothesized to be an important part of the rate-limiting step of ADP release. Furthermore, computational studies that investigated the mode of ADP release from PKA with two magnesium ions bound suggested that ADP release was so energetically unfavorable that it was nearly impossible without release of one or both magnesium ions.[16] This structure supports the previous findings and hypothesis because PKA binds to ADP with one magnesium ion corresponding to Mg2. An examination of several kinase structures bound to ADP suggests that many kinases may release Mg1 following phosphoryl transfer or bind Mg2 more strongly than Mg1. Several kinase structures crystallized with ADP show two magnesium ions at the active site that correspond to Mg1 and Mg2.[23,36,37] In other cases, when a kinase binds one magnesium ion at the active site, the ion bound corresponds to Mg2.[23,38−41] Therefore, it is likely that many protein kinases bind two magnesium ions to facilitate phosphoryl transfer. Kinases can then retain both ions following phosphoryl transfer or can release one ion, the Mg1 ion, to facilitate ADP release. There are, however, some kinase structures bound to ADP that bind the magnesium ions in positions that do not correspond to the Mg2 and Mg1 sites seen in PKA,[42,43] and there are structures with only one magnesium ion bound that binds only to ADP and no amino acid residues.[44,45] Therefore, these magnesium binding sites and mode of magnesium release may not be universal for all kinases but likely control many kinases. In addition to validating the potential mode of magnesium release during reaction turnover, the ADP bound structure also provides a glimpse of possible motions and conformations involved in ADP release. The ADP bound structure adopts a mostly open conformation, but it is still more closed than the apo state (Figure 5A–C). The Gly-rich loop lowers compared with the apo state to help bind to ADP at the active site but not as much as in the ternary, closed state. Similarly, the C-tail moves into the active site to bind to ADP with residues Phe327 and Tyr330, as in the closed state, but the C-tail does not move into the active site to the same extent in the ADP bound structure as in the intermediate or closed states (Figure 5A–C). ADP release likely proceeds with opening of the enzyme cleft via rising of the Gly-rich loop and C-terminal tail as shown in the ADP bound structure (Figure 5A–C). Also, one of the molecules in the asymmetric unit, chain A, does not show the C-tail binding at the active site because it is blocked by a symmetry related molecule (Figure 3B). ADP is still present at the active site in chain A but is not as stably bound as in chain B based on electron density and B-factor values. Therefore, a possible mode of ADP release involves removal of the C-terminal tail from the active site following general opening of the active site, which then destabilizes ADP binding allowing for release. Combining the information about the role of the magnesium ions in ADP release, a potential mode of reaction progression and ADP release by PKA becomes evident. Following phosphoryl transfer, Mg1 is released, which destabilizes ADP binding. Subsequently, the active site opens through rising of the Gly-rich loop and disengagement of the C-terminal tail, which is no longer coupled to the Gly-rich loop. This uncoupling of the C-tail from the Gly-rich loop would further facilitate ADP release (Figure 7). It is also possible that ADP release is not controlled by movement of the C-tail alone but by the coordinated motions of both the C-tail and Gly-rich loop together. Therefore, these structures begin to explain how the rate limiting step of ADP release may proceed and identify conformations and movements involved in this process. Also, each of the two molecules in the ASU exemplify possible conformations and trajectories involved in this release step. Our recent elucidation of a community map for PKA shows clearly how the C-tail and β strands one and two function as an integrated community in the closed conformation, whereas this community is uncoupled in the apo conformation (McClendon, C. et al., manuscript in preparation).
Figure 7

Schematic representation of possible steps and conformations involved in reaction turnover by PKA. This depiction highlights conformational changes that may occur including opening of the active site following substrate release. See Bastidas et al.[22] and Jacobsen et al.[23] for more detailed depictions of possible substrate binding and release steps.

Schematic representation of possible steps and conformations involved in reaction turnover by PKA. This depiction highlights conformational changes that may occur including opening of the active site following substrate release. See Bastidas et al.[22] and Jacobsen et al.[23] for more detailed depictions of possible substrate binding and release steps. In summary, the ADP bound structure reported here further defines the conformational flexibility of the C-subunit and does not conform to any of the previously defined states, open, closed, or intermediate. Furthermore, the ADP bound structure provides evidence of how reaction progression may proceed in PKA and kinases in general. ADP binds at the active site with only one magnesium ion corresponding to Mg2, which is consistent with previous reports suggesting that Mg1 is released following phosphoryl transfer, and release of Mg1 may be an important step that precedes ADP release. Additionally, the conformation adopted with the ADP bound structure presents evidence of the conformational changes that may precede ADP release during reaction turnover including opening of the active site by movement of the Gly-rich loop and C-tail away from the active site.
  45 in total

1.  Snapping of the carboxyl terminal tail of the catalytic subunit of PKA onto its core: characterization of the sites by mutagenesis.

Authors:  M Batkin; I Schvartz; S Shaltiel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  An ATP-linked structural change in protein kinase A precedes phosphoryl transfer under physiological magnesium concentrations.

Authors:  J Shaffer; J A Adams
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Crystal structure of human CDC7 kinase in complex with its activator DBF4.

Authors:  Siobhan Hughes; Frédéric Elustondo; Andrea Di Fonzo; Frédéric G Leroux; Ai C Wong; Ambrosius P Snijders; Stephen J Matthews; Peter Cherepanov
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Development of o-chlorophenyl substituted pyrimidines as exceptionally potent aurora kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Matthew P Martin; Yunting Luo; Roberta Pireddu; Hua Yang; Harsukh Gevariya; Harshani R Lawrence; Sevil Ozcan; Jin-Yi Zhu; Robert Kendig; Mercedes Rodriguez; Roy Elias; Jin Q Cheng; Saïd M Sebti; Ernst Schonbrunn; Nicholas J Lawrence
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM.

Authors:  T Geoff G Battye; Luke Kontogiannis; Owen Johnson; Harold R Powell; Andrew G W Leslie
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-03-18

6.  Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase complexed with MgATP and peptide inhibitor.

Authors:  J Zheng; D R Knighton; L F ten Eyck; R Karlsson; N Xuong; S S Taylor; J M Sowadski
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-03-09       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Structures of rhodopsin kinase in different ligand states reveal key elements involved in G protein-coupled receptor kinase activation.

Authors:  Puja Singh; Benlian Wang; Tadao Maeda; Krzysztof Palczewski; John J G Tesmer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Structural insight into nucleotide recognition in tau-protein kinase I/glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta.

Authors:  Masaaki Aoki; Takehiro Yokota; Ikuko Sugiura; Chizuko Sasaki; Tsukasa Hasegawa; Chieko Okumura; Koichi Ishiguro; Toshiyuki Kohno; Shigetoshi Sugio; Takao Matsuzaki
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-02-25

9.  An autoinhibitory tyrosine motif in the cell-cycle-regulated Nek7 kinase is released through binding of Nek9.

Authors:  Mark W Richards; Laura O'Regan; Corine Mas-Droux; Joelle M Y Blot; Jack Cheung; Swen Hoelder; Andrew M Fry; Richard Bayliss
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  12 in total

1.  Two PKA RIα holoenzyme states define ATP as an isoform-specific orthosteric inhibitor that competes with the allosteric activator, cAMP.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Lu; Jian Wu; Phillip C Aoto; Jui-Hung Weng; Lalima G Ahuja; Nicholas Sun; Cecilia Y Cheng; Ping Zhang; Susan S Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Conformational transition paths harbor structures useful for aiding drug discovery and understanding enzymatic mechanisms in protein kinases.

Authors:  Chung F Wong
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Atomic Structure of GRK5 Reveals Distinct Structural Features Novel for G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinases.

Authors:  Konstantin E Komolov; Anshul Bhardwaj; Jeffrey L Benovic
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Structural Basis for Noncanonical Substrate Recognition of Cofilin/ADF Proteins by LIM Kinases.

Authors:  Stephanie Hamill; Hua Jane Lou; Benjamin E Turk; Titus J Boggon
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 5.  Evolution of a dynamic molecular switch.

Authors:  Susan S Taylor; Hiruy S Meharena; Alexandr P Kornev
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.885

6.  Structure of a PKA RIα Recurrent Acrodysostosis Mutant Explains Defective cAMP-Dependent Activation.

Authors:  Jessica Gh Bruystens; Jian Wu; Audrey Fortezzo; Jason Del Rio; Cole Nielsen; Donald K Blumenthal; Ruth Rock; Eduard Stefan; Susan S Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Water-mediated conformational preselection mechanism in substrate binding cooperativity to protein kinase A.

Authors:  Piotr Setny; Marta D Wiśniewska
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mapping the Hydrogen Bond Networks in the Catalytic Subunit of Protein Kinase A Using H/D Fractionation Factors.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Li; Atul K Srivastava; Jonggul Kim; Susan S Taylor; Gianluigi Veglia
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 9.  Metal Fluorides: Tools for Structural and Computational Analysis of Phosphoryl Transfer Enzymes.

Authors:  Yi Jin; Robert W Molt; G Michael Blackburn
Journal:  Top Curr Chem (Cham)       Date:  2017-03-15

10.  Mechanistic basis of Nek7 activation through Nek9 binding and induced dimerization.

Authors:  Tamanna Haq; Mark W Richards; Selena G Burgess; Pablo Gallego; Sharon Yeoh; Laura O'Regan; David Reverter; Joan Roig; Andrew M Fry; Richard Bayliss
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.