Literature DB >> 25077115

Stage, treatment and outcomes for patients with breast cancer in British Columbia in 2002: a population-based cohort study.

Ashley Davidson1, Stephen Chia2, Robert Olson3, Alan Nichol4, Caroline Speers5, Andy J Coldman6, Chris Bajdik7, Ryan Woods5, Scott Tyldesley8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are very few long-term Canadian data on breast cancer outcomes by stage. We described the stage, treatment and outcomes of breast cancer at a population level for patients in British Columbia.
METHODS: This population-based cohort study included almost all patients with incident breast cancer registered in 2002 (about 97.6% registry case completeness). For these patients, information on stage, primary local surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy and survival outcome (based on registry date and cause-of-death data) were available. We calculated Kaplan-Meier curves for breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival by stage and analyzed prognostic and treatment factors with a multivariable Cox model.
RESULTS: The 2927 incident cases of breast cancer identified in 2002 had the following distribution by stage: stage 0 (in situ), 424 (14%); stage I, 1118 (38%); stage II, 938 (32%); stage III, 233 (8%); stage IV, 123 (4%); unknown, 91 (3%). The distribution of patients' ages was < 40 years, 127 (4%); 40-49, 538 (18%); 50-59, 719 (25%); 60-69, 660 (23%); 70-79, 583 (20%); ≥ 80, 300 (10%). Within the first year after diagnosis, radiotherapy was provided to 1649 patients (56%), chemotherapy to 928 (32%) and hormone therapy to 1664 (57%). Ten-year breast cancer-specific survival rates by stage were > 99% for stage 0, 95% for stage I, 81% for stage II, 55% for stage III and 4% for stage IV. Ten-year overall survival rates were 89% for stage 0, 81% for stage I, 68% for stage II, 43% for stage III and 2% for stage IV.
INTERPRETATION: This analysis provides a Canadian benchmark for treatment rates and 10-year outcomes by stage for all incident cases of breast cancer in a single province. Outcomes in British Columbia compared well with published rates for the United States and Europe.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25077115      PMCID: PMC3985980          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20130017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  22 in total

1.  An update on cancer survival.

Authors:  Larry F Ellison; Kathryn Wilkins
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.796

2.  Flawed inferences about screening mammography's benefit based on observational data.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Cornelia J Baines; Michael Baum; Kay Dickersin; Suzanne W Fletcher; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Bernard Junod; Jan Maehlen; Lisa M Schwartz; H Gilbert Welch; Steven Woloshin; Hazel Thornton; Per-Henrik Zahl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors:  M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Cancer survival in Germany and the United States at the beginning of the 21st century: an up-to-date comparison by period analysis.

Authors:  Adam Gondos; Volker Arndt; Bernd Holleczek; Christa Stegmaier; Hartwig Ziegler; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Disparities in the application of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer: impact on overall survival.

Authors:  Anthony E Dragun; Bin Huang; Thomas C Tucker; William J Spanos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prognosis, treatment, and recurrence of breast cancer for women attending or not attending the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; D Mates; L Kan; J Fung; R Samant; L J Burhenne
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Reduced mortality for women with mammography-detected breast cancer in east Denmark and south Sweden.

Authors:  L H Christensen; G Engholm; R Cortes; J Ceberg; U Tange; M Andersson; A Bladström; H T Mouridsen; T Möller; Hans Storm
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Doris Schopper; Chris de Wolf
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD).

Authors:  Michel P Coleman; Manuela Quaresma; Franco Berrino; Jean-Michel Lutz; Roberta De Angelis; Riccardo Capocaccia; Paolo Baili; Bernard Rachet; Gemma Gatta; Timo Hakulinen; Andrea Micheli; Milena Sant; Hannah K Weir; J Mark Elwood; Hideaki Tsukuma; Sergio Koifman; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Silvia Francisci; Mariano Santaquilani; Arduino Verdecchia; Hans H Storm; John L Young
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Estimation of an optimal chemotherapy utilisation rate for breast cancer: setting an evidence-based benchmark for the best-quality cancer care.

Authors:  Weng Ng; Geoff P Delaney; Susannah Jacob; Michael B Barton
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  9 in total

1.  Advanced Clinical Stage at Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Is Associated with Poorer Health-Related Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Julia de Mello Ramirez Medina; Ingrid de Araujo Trugilho; Giovanna Nunes Belo Mendes; Josiel Guedes Silva; Maria Alexsandra da Silva Paiva; Suzana Sales de Aguiar; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler; Anke Bergmann
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-12-19

2.  Quantifying patient preferences for symptomatic breast clinic referral: a decision analysis study.

Authors:  Aisling Quinlan; Kirsty K O'Brien; Rose Galvin; Colin Hardy; Ronan McDonnell; Doireann Joyce; Ronald D McDowell; Emma Aherne; Claire Keogh; Katriona O'Sullivan; Tom Fahey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  OLFM4, LY6D and S100A7 as potent markers for distant metastasis in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Akifumi Mayama; Kiyoshi Takagi; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Ai Sato; Yoshiaki Onodera; Yasuhiro Miki; Minako Sakurai; Takanori Watanabe; Kazuhiro Sakamoto; Ryuichi Yoshida; Takanori Ishida; Hironobu Sasano; Takashi Suzuki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 6.716

4.  Everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) in patients with advanced breast cancer aged ≥ 65 years: new lessons for clinical practice from the EVA study.

Authors:  Marina Cazzaniga; Claudio Verusio; Mariangela Ciccarese; Alberto Fumagalli; Donata Sartori; Maria Rosario Valerio; Cristina Ancona; Mario Airoldi; Gabriella Moretti; Corrado Ficorella; Valentina Arcangeli; Lucrezia Diodati; Alberto Zambelli; Antonio Febbraro; Daniele Generali; Mirco Pistelli; Ornella Garrone; Antonino Musolino; Patrizia Vici; Michela Maur; Lucia Mentuccia; Nicla La Verde; Giulia Bianchi; Salvatore Artale; Livio Blasi; Matilde Piezzo; Francesco Atzori; Anna Turletti; Chiara Benedetto; Maria Concetta Cursano; Alessandra Fabi; Vittorio Gebbia; Antonio Schirone; Raffaella Palumbo; Antonella Ferzi; Antonio Frassoldati; Claudio Scavelli; Luca Clivio; Valter Torri On Behalf Of The Eva Study Group
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-07

5.  Downstaging in opportunistic breast cancer screening in Brazil: a temporal trend analysis.

Authors:  Diama Bhadra Vale; Cassio Cardoso Filho; Julia Yoriko Shinzato; Fernanda Servidoni Spreafico; Partha Basu; Luiz Carlos Zeferino
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to breast cancer screening among female health care professionals: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Humariya Heena; Sajid Durrani; Muhammad Riaz; Isamme AlFayyad; Rabeena Tabasim; Gazi Parvez; Amani Abu-Shaheen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Stage-Specific Survival Rate of Breast Cancer Patients in Northern Thailand in Accordance with Two Different Staging Systems.

Authors:  Imjai Chitapanarux; Patumrat Sripan; Areewan Somwangprasert; Chaiyut Charoentum; Wimrak Onchan; Kirati Watcharachan; Panchaporn Wongmaneerung; Pailin Kongmebhol; Bongkot Jia-Mahasap; Lalita Huntrakul
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-09-01

Review 8.  Aromatase inhibitors are associated with a higher fracture risk than tamoxifen: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Olivia L Tseng; John J Spinelli; Carolyn C Gotay; Wan Y Ho; Mary L McBride; Martin G Dawes
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 5.346

9.  D-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase in breast carcinoma as a potent prognostic marker associated with proliferation.

Authors:  Chiaki Hayashi; Kiyoshi Takagi; Ai Sato; Mio Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Minemura; Yasuhiro Miki; Narumi Harada-Shoji; Minoru Miyashita; Hironobu Sasano; Takashi Suzuki
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.303

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.