Literature DB >> 20034784

Estimation of an optimal chemotherapy utilisation rate for breast cancer: setting an evidence-based benchmark for the best-quality cancer care.

Weng Ng1, Geoff P Delaney, Susannah Jacob, Michael B Barton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The proportion of breast cancer patients that received chemotherapy varies widely in high-income countries. An evidence-based estimate of the optimal chemotherapy utilisation rate for a breast cancer population may serve as a useful benchmark for measuring and improving the quality of care.
METHODS: An optimal chemotherapy utilisation model was constructed using indications for chemotherapy identified from evidence-based guidelines. Data on the proportion of patient (age, performance status and preference) and tumour (stage, size, grade, nodal status, hormone receptor and HER2 status) attributes were obtained and merged with the treatment indications to calculate an optimal utilisation rate. This model was peer-reviewed by a panel of independent experts.
RESULTS: Chemotherapy was indicated in 17 of the 24 possible clinical scenarios depicted in the optimal utilisation model. The estimated optimal proportion of breast cancer patients who should received chemotherapy at least once was 68%. Sensitivity analyses showed that the range of optimal rate was 60-69%. The optimal rate appears to be substantially higher than the reported actual rates (29-49%).
CONCLUSION: It is possible to generate an optimal chemotherapy utilisation rate in breast cancer to serve as an evidence-based benchmark. The optimal chemotherapy utilisation rate in breast cancer has remained largely unchanged over the past 15years. The reported actual utilisation rates of chemotherapy in breast cancer populations appear to have remained below the estimated optimal rate, suggesting that potential opportunities for improvement in the compliance to guideline recommended care exist. Crown Copyright 2009. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20034784     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  5 in total

1.  Optimal sequence of implied modalities in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer treatment: an update on issues to consider.

Authors:  Pelagia G Tsoutsou; Yazid Belkacemi; Joseph Gligorov; Abraham Kuten; Hamouda Boussen; Nuran Bese; Michael I Koukourakis
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  Stage, treatment and outcomes for patients with breast cancer in British Columbia in 2002: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ashley Davidson; Stephen Chia; Robert Olson; Alan Nichol; Caroline Speers; Andy J Coldman; Chris Bajdik; Ryan Woods; Scott Tyldesley
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2013-11-07

3.  Using relative survival measures for cross-sectional and longitudinal benchmarks of countries, states, and districts: the BenchRelSurv- and BenchRelSurvPlot-macros.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Iris Reinhard; Ute S Albert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Identification of breast cancer recurrence risk factors based on functional pathways in tumor and normal tissues.

Authors:  Xiujie Chen; Lei Liu; YunFeng Wang; Bo Liu; Diheng Zeng; Qing Jin; MengJian Li; DeNan Zhang; Qiuqi Liu; Hongbo Xie
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-28

5.  Oral vinorelbine versus intravenous vinorelbine, in combination with epirubicin as first-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Liang Huang; Xiaojia Wang; Liheng Zhou; Lijun Di; Hongyu Zheng; Zefei Jiang; Yongsheng Wang; Xiangqun Song; Jifeng Feng; Shiying Yu; Yunpeng Liu; Hong Zheng; Kunwei Shen; Zhongsheng Tong; Zhimin Shao
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.333

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.