Literature DB >> 10369083

Prognosis, treatment, and recurrence of breast cancer for women attending or not attending the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia.

I A Olivotto1, D Mates, L Kan, J Fung, R Samant, L J Burhenne.   

Abstract

Breast cancer screening programs have been initiated in many countries in the past decade. To determine the impact of the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia (SMPBC), disease and treatment outcomes for women with breast cancer diagnosed in BC between 1989 and 1996 were compared on the basis of attendance at the SMPBC. An SMPBC attender was a women diagnosed with breast cancer within three years of an SMPBC screen, regardless whether the cancer was detected as a result of that screen. Of the 13,636 women aged 40-89 years diagnosed with breast cancer in BC during the study period, 2,647 (19.4%) were SMPBC attenders. 73.5% of SMPBC attenders (N = 1,946) and 74.2% of non-attenders (N = 8,149) were referred to the BC Cancer Agency and had pathology, staging, treatment, and outcome information available. SMPBC attenders compared with non-attenders were more likely to have in situ disease alone, and those with invasive cancers had smaller tumors which were less likely to have grade III histology and less likely to have spread to axillary lymph nodes (all P < 0.001). SMPBC attenders were more likely to be treated with breast conservation and less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen (P < 0.001). Log-rank tests showed local (P = 0.017), distant (P < 0.001), and overall (P < 0.001) disease-free survival were better for SMPBC attenders. These favorable surrogate endpoints suggest that the benefits of breast screening as demonstrated by randomized trials can be translated into community practice by an organized breast screening program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10369083     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006152918283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  9 in total

1.  Stage, treatment and outcomes for patients with breast cancer in British Columbia in 2002: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ashley Davidson; Stephen Chia; Robert Olson; Alan Nichol; Caroline Speers; Andy J Coldman; Chris Bajdik; Ryan Woods; Scott Tyldesley
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2013-11-07

2.  Performance of screening mammography in organized programs in Canada in 1996. The Database Management Subcommittee to the National Committee for the Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Initiative.

Authors:  D Paquette; J Snider; F Bouchard; I Olivotto; H Bryant; K Decker; G Doyle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years.

Authors:  Judith A Malmgren; Jay Parikh; Mary K Atwood; Henry G Kaplan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods.

Authors:  Tiina Lehtimäki; Mikael Lundin; Nina Linder; Harri Sihto; Kaija Holli; Taina Turpeenniemi-Hujanen; Vesa Kataja; Jorma Isola; Heikki Joensuu; Johan Lundin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Proliferation marker securin identifies favourable outcome in invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  K Talvinen; J Tuikkala; O Nevalainen; A Rantanen; P Hirsimäki; J Sundström; P Kronqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Are international differences in breast cancer survival between Australia and the UK present amongst both screen-detected women and non-screen-detected women? survival estimates for women diagnosed in West Midlands and New South Wales 1997-2006.

Authors:  Laura M Woods; Bernard Rachet; Dianne L O'Connell; Gill Lawrence; Michel P Coleman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Comparison of breast cancer survival in two populations: Ardabil, Iran and British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Alireza Sadjadi; T Gregory Hislop; Chris Bajdik; Morteza Bashash; Anahita Ghorbani; Mehdi Nouraie; Masoud Babaei; Reza Malekzadeh; Parvin Yavari
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Maximino Redondo; Rafael Funez; Francisco Medina-Cano; Isabel Rodrigo; Mercedes Acebal; Teresa Tellez; M Jose Roldan; M Luisa Hortas; Ana Bellinvia; Teresa Pereda; Laia Domingo; María Morales-Suarez Varela; Maria Sala; Antonio Rueda
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Mammography-based screening program: preliminary results from a first 2-year round in a Brazilian region using mobile and fixed units.

Authors:  Raphael Luiz Haikel; Edmundo Carvalho Mauad; Thiago Buosi Silva; Jacó Saraiva de Castro Mattos; Luciano Fernandes Chala; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Nestor de Barros
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.809

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.