Literature DB >> 25075950

Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach.

J Guyader1, M Eugène1, P Nozière1, D P Morgavi1, M Doreau1, C Martin1.   

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of protozoa concentration on methane emission from ruminants. A database was built from 59 publications reporting data from 76 in vivo experiments. The experiments included in the database recorded methane production and rumen protozoa concentration measured on the same groups of animals. Quantitative data such as diet chemical composition, rumen fermentation and microbial parameters, and qualitative information such as methane mitigation strategies were also collected. In the database, 31% of the experiments reported a concomitant reduction of both protozoa concentration and methane emission (g/kg dry matter intake). Nearly all of these experiments tested lipids as methane mitigation strategies. By contrast, 21% of the experiments reported a variation in methane emission without changes in protozoa numbers, indicating that methanogenesis is also regulated by other mechanisms not involving protozoa. Experiments that used chemical compounds as an antimethanogenic treatment belonged to this group. The relationship between methane emission and protozoa concentration was studied with a variance-covariance model, with experiment as a fixed effect. The experiments included in the analysis had a within-experiment variation of protozoa concentration higher than 5.3 log10 cells/ml corresponding to the average s.e.m. of the database for this variable. To detect potential interfering factors for the relationship, the influence of several qualitative and quantitative secondary factors was tested. This meta-analysis showed a significant linear relationship between methane emission and protozoa concentration: methane (g/kg dry matter intake)=-30.7+8.14×protozoa (log10 cells/ml) with 28 experiments (91 treatments), residual mean square error=1.94 and adjusted R 2=0.90. The proportion of butyrate in the rumen positively influenced the least square means of this relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25075950     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114001852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  24 in total

1.  Changes in the Rumen Microbiota of Cows in Response to Dietary Supplementation with Nitrate, Linseed, and Saponin Alone or in Combination.

Authors:  Milka Popova; Jessie Guyader; Mathieu Silberberg; Ahmad Reza Seradj; Cristina Saro; Aurélien Bernard; Christine Gérard; Cécile Martin; Diego P Morgavi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Itzhak Mizrahi; R John Wallace; Sarah Moraïs
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Sheep fed with banana leaf hay reduce ruminal protozoa population.

Authors:  Cláudio Eduardo Silva Freitas; Eduardo Robson Duarte; Dorismar David Alves; Isabel Martinele; Marta D'Agosto; Franciane Cedrola; Angélica Alves de Moura Freitas; Franklin Delano Dos Santos Soares; Makenzi Beltran
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 4.  The host-associated archaeome.

Authors:  Guillaume Borrel; Jean-François Brugère; Simonetta Gribaldo; Ruth A Schmitz; Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Fungal and ciliate protozoa are the main rumen microbes associated with methane emissions in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Adrián López-García; Alejandro Saborío-Montero; Mónica Gutiérrez-Rivas; Raquel Atxaerandio; Idoia Goiri; Aser García-Rodríguez; Jose A Jiménez-Montero; Carmen González; Javier Tamames; Fernando Puente-Sánchez; Magdalena Serrano; Rafael Carrasco; Cristina Óvilo; Oscar González-Recio
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 6.  The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock.

Authors:  Ilma Tapio; Timothy J Snelling; Francesco Strozzi; R John Wallace
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-19

7.  Rumen methanogen and protozoal communities of Tibetan sheep and Gansu Alpine Finewool sheep grazing on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.

Authors:  Jinqiang Huang; Yongjuan Li
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Dynamics of methanogenesis, ruminal fermentation and fiber digestibility in ruminants following elimination of protozoa: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zongjun Li; Qi Deng; Yangfan Liu; Tao Yan; Fei Li; Yangchun Cao; Junhu Yao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-12-18

Review 9.  The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen.

Authors:  Charles J Newbold; Gabriel de la Fuente; Alejandro Belanche; Eva Ramos-Morales; Neil R McEwan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database.

Authors:  Mutian Niu; Ermias Kebreab; Alexander N Hristov; Joonpyo Oh; Claudia Arndt; André Bannink; Ali R Bayat; André F Brito; Tommy Boland; David Casper; Les A Crompton; Jan Dijkstra; Maguy A Eugène; Phil C Garnsworthy; Md Najmul Haque; Anne L F Hellwing; Pekka Huhtanen; Michael Kreuzer; Bjoern Kuhla; Peter Lund; Jørgen Madsen; Cécile Martin; Shelby C McClelland; Mark McGee; Peter J Moate; Stefan Muetzel; Camila Muñoz; Padraig O'Kiely; Nico Peiren; Christopher K Reynolds; Angela Schwarm; Kevin J Shingfield; Tonje M Storlien; Martin R Weisbjerg; David R Yáñez-Ruiz; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 10.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.