Literature DB >> 35077540

Fungal and ciliate protozoa are the main rumen microbes associated with methane emissions in dairy cattle.

Adrián López-García1, Alejandro Saborío-Montero1,2, Mónica Gutiérrez-Rivas1, Raquel Atxaerandio3, Idoia Goiri3, Aser García-Rodríguez3, Jose A Jiménez-Montero4, Carmen González1, Javier Tamames5, Fernando Puente-Sánchez5, Magdalena Serrano1, Rafael Carrasco6, Cristina Óvilo1, Oscar González-Recio1,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mitigating the effects of global warming has become the main challenge for humanity in recent decades. Livestock farming contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, with an important output of methane from enteric fermentation processes, mostly in ruminants. Because ruminal microbiota is directly involved in digestive fermentation processes and methane biosynthesis, understanding the ecological relationships between rumen microorganisms and their active metabolic pathways is essential for reducing emissions. This study analysed whole rumen metagenome using long reads and considering its compositional nature in order to disentangle the role of rumen microbes in methane emissions.
RESULTS: The β-diversity analyses suggested a subtle association between methane production and overall microbiota composition (0.01 < R2 < 0.02). Differential abundance analysis identified 36 genera and 279 KEGGs as significantly associated with methane production (Padj < 0.05). Those genera associated with high methane production were Eukaryota from Alveolata and Fungi clades, while Bacteria were associated with low methane emissions. The genus-level association network showed 2 clusters grouping Eukaryota and Bacteria, respectively. Regarding microbial gene functions, 41 KEGGs were found to be differentially abundant between low- and high-emission animals and were mainly involved in metabolic pathways. No KEGGs included in the methane metabolism pathway (ko00680) were detected as associated with high methane emissions. The KEGG network showed 3 clusters grouping KEGGs associated with high emissions, low emissions, and not differentially abundant in either. A deeper analysis of the differentially abundant KEGGs revealed that genes related with anaerobic respiration through nitrate degradation were more abundant in low-emission animals.
CONCLUSIONS: Methane emissions are largely associated with the relative abundance of ciliates and fungi. The role of nitrate electron acceptors can be particularly important because this respiration mechanism directly competes with methanogenesis. Whole metagenome sequencing is necessary to jointly consider the relative abundance of Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryota in the statistical analyses. Nutritional and genetic strategies to reduce CH4 emissions should focus on reducing the relative abundance of Alveolata and Fungi in the rumen. This experiment has generated the largest ONT ruminal metagenomic dataset currently available.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press GigaScience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nanopore; dairy cattle; long reads; methane; microbiome; rumen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35077540      PMCID: PMC8848325          DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giab088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


  60 in total

Review 1.  The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification.

Authors:  T Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Methyl-coenzyme M reductase A as an indicator to estimate methane production from dairy cows.

Authors:  M A Aguinaga Casañas; N Rangkasenee; N Krattenmacher; G Thaller; C C Metges; B Kuhla
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Exploring the sheep rumen microbiome for carbohydrate-active enzymes.

Authors:  Lucas Dantas Lopes; André Oliveira de Souza Lima; Rodrigo Gouvêa Taketani; Phillip Darias; Lília Raquel Fé da Silva; Emiliana Manesco Romagnoli; Helder Louvandini; Adibe Luiz Abdalla; Rodrigo Mendes
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.271

4.  The enzymic interconversion of acetate and acetyl-coenzyme A in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T D Brown; M C Jones-Mortimer; H L Kornberg
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1977-10

5.  Rumen protozoa and methanogenesis: not a simple cause-effect relationship.

Authors:  Diego P Morgavi; Cécile Martin; Jean-Pierre Jouany; Maria José Ranilla
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 6.  The biological role of nitric oxide in bacteria.

Authors:  W G Zumft
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies.

Authors:  Matthew E Ritchie; Belinda Phipson; Di Wu; Yifang Hu; Charity W Law; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Nitrate and Inhibition of Ruminal Methanogenesis: Microbial Ecology, Obstacles, and Opportunities for Lowering Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock.

Authors:  Chengjian Yang; John A Rooke; Irene Cabeza; Robert J Wallace
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Increases the Production of Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Decreases pH Values in Mouse Colon.

Authors:  Min Xie; Hai-Hong Chen; Shao-Ping Nie; Jun-Yi Yin; Ming-Yong Xie
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  SqueezeMeta, A Highly Portable, Fully Automatic Metagenomic Analysis Pipeline.

Authors:  Javier Tamames; Fernando Puente-Sánchez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fungal and ciliate protozoa are the main rumen microbes associated with methane emissions in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Adrián López-García; Alejandro Saborío-Montero; Mónica Gutiérrez-Rivas; Raquel Atxaerandio; Idoia Goiri; Aser García-Rodríguez; Jose A Jiménez-Montero; Carmen González; Javier Tamames; Fernando Puente-Sánchez; Magdalena Serrano; Rafael Carrasco; Cristina Óvilo; Oscar González-Recio
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.524

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.