| Literature DB >> 25075317 |
Mirella Vivoli1, Emily Ayres1, Edward Beaumont1, Michail N Isupov1, Nicholas J Harmer1.
Abstract
Capsular polysaccharides (CPSs) are protective structures on the surfaces of many Gram-negative bacteria. The principal CPS of the human pathogen and Tier 1 select agent Burkholderia pseudomallei consists of a linear repeat of --3)--2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose-(1-. This CPS is critical to the virulence of this emerging pathogen and represents a key target for the development of novel therapeutics. wcbI is one of several genes in the CPS biosynthetic cluster whose deletion leads to significant attenuation of the pathogen; unlike most others, it has no homologues of known function and no detectable sequence similarity to any protein with an extant structure. Here, the crystal structure of WcbI bound to its proposed product, coenzyme A, is reported at 1.38 Å resolution, solved using the halide-soak method with multiple anomalous dispersion. This structure reveals that WcbI incorporates a previously described 100-amino-acid subdomain into a novel, principally helical fold (310 amino acids). This fold adopts a cradle-like structure, with a deep binding pocket for CoA in the loop-rich cradle. Structural analysis and biophysical assays suggest that WcbI functions as an acetyltransferase enzyme, whilst biochemical tests suggest that another functional module might be required to assist its activity in forming the mature B. pseudomallei capsule.Entities:
Keywords: Burkholderia pseudomallei; acetyl-CoA; acetyltransferases; capsular polysaccharides; melioidosis
Year: 2013 PMID: 25075317 PMCID: PMC4104973 DOI: 10.1107/S205225251302695X
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IUCrJ ISSN: 2052-2525 Impact factor: 4.769
Figure 1Proposed pathway for the biosynthesis of 2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose from sedoheptulose 7-phosphate in B. pseudomallei (after Harmer, 2010 ▶).
Data-collection and refinement statistics
Values in parentheses are for the outer resolution shell.
| Br soak | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data set | Low-energy remote | Peak | Inflection | High-energy remote | CoA complex |
| Beamline (Diamond Light Source) | I02 | I02 | I02 | I02 | I24 |
| Space group |
|
|
|
|
|
| Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rotation interval collected (°) | 360 | 180 | 180 | 360 | 300 |
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.9795 | 0.9200 | 0.9202 | 0.9098 | 0.9778 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 63.7–1.56 (1.60–1.56) | 63.7–1.96 (2.01–1.96) | 63.7–1.86 (1.91–1.86) | 63.7–2.01 (2.–2.01) | 24–1.38 (1.42–1.38) |
| Completeness (%) | 92.0 (72.6) | 66.0 (12.5) | 56.6 (2.1) | 69.6 (16.8) | 92.3 (59.4) |
| Redundancy | 3.9 (3.7) | 3.8 (3.6) | 1.9 (1.5) | 1.9 (1.9) | 2.8 (2.5) |
| 〈 | 13.0 (2.2) | 15.3 (2.0) | 14.8 (2.1) | 16.3 (2.4) | 55.9 (5.7) |
|
| 4.8 (57.1) | 4.4 (59.0) | 3.2 (29.7) | 5.1 (46.6) | 2.4 (18.4) |
|
| 17.71 | 11.95 | |||
|
| 21.29 | 15.7 | |||
| R.m.s.d., bond lengths | 0.011 [0.019] | 0.007 [0.020] | |||
| R.m.s.d., bond angles | 1.5 [2.0] | 1.3 [2.0] | |||
| Wilson | 31.6 | 21.0 | |||
| Average | |||||
| Protein | 27.2 | 19.0 | |||
| Solvent | 37.9 | 35.0 | |||
| Ligand CoA | 36.8 | 18.9 | |||
| Occupancy of ligand | 0.5–0.6 | 0.80–0.88 | |||
| Ramachandran plot analysis | |||||
| Residues in most favoured regions | 97.1 | 97.2 | |||
| Residues in outlier regions | 0.16 | 0.16 | |||
|
| 1.82 [64th] | 1.87 [46th] | |||
R sym = , where I(h) is the intensity of reflection h, is the sum over all reflections and is the sum over J measurements of the reflection.
R cryst = .
Target values are given in square brackets.
The Wilson B factor was estimated by SFCHECK (Vaguine et al., 1999 ▶).
Ramachandran plot analysis was performed by MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010 ▶).
Figure 2The structure of WcbI reveals a novel fold. (a) Cartoon representation of the crystal structure of WcbI in two orientations. Termini and secondary-structure elements are labelled. For the N-terminal subdomain α-helices and loops are shown in red and β-sheets in yellow; for the C-terminal subdomain α-helices and loops are shown in blue and β-sheets in green. (b) Stereoview of the Cα backbone in the same orientation as in the left-hand image of (a). Every tenth residue is numbered. (c) Topological diagram of the polypeptide fold with α-helices indicated by circles and β-strands by triangles coloured as in (a). (d) Cartoon representation of WcbI in the orientations in (a) coloured as a rainbow with the N-terminus in blue and the C-terminus in red. (e) Schematic diagram of the fold of WcbI. α-Helices and 310-helices are shown as cylinders and β-sheets are shown as arrows. Secondary-structure elements are coloured as in (d). The start and end residue of each element is indicated. (f) Cartoon representation of the novel fold C-terminal subdomain coloured as a rainbow with the N-terminus in blue and the C-terminus in red. The substrate coenzyme A is shown as spheres. Carbon, cyan; oxygen, red; nitrogen, blue; sulfur, yellow; phosphorus, orange. Interacting residues from the novel subdomain are shown as lines. The secondary-structure assignments in all panels were made according to TOPS (Michalopoulos et al., 2003 ▶). (a), (b), (d) and (f) were prepared with the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (Schrödinger) and (c) was prepared with TOPS.
Figure 3WcbI binds to coenzyme A. (a) Electron-density map showing the binding of coenzyme A (CoA) to WcbI. WcbI is shown as a cyan cartoon, with CoA as sticks. For clarity, water molecules are not shown. An F o − F c OMIT map is shown contoured at 3σ. The bond from CoA to Cys14 is shown. (b) Schematic drawing of the WcbI–CoA interactions. (c) Key WcbI–CoA interactions. WcbI is shown as a cyan cartoon, with interacting side chains as purple sticks. CoA is shown as sticks. Hydrogen-bond distances are shown. Nitrogen, blue; oxygen, red, phosphorus, orange; CoA carbon, yellow; WcbI carbon, purple. (a) and (c) were prepared with the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (Schrödinger) and (b) was prepared with LigPlot + (Laskowski & Swindells, 2011 ▶).
Figure 4Biophysical characterization of WcbI binding to CoA. (a) Differential scanning fluorimetry thermal denaturation curves for WcbI show a biphasic response. With no CoA (black line) or a high saturation (1 mM) of CoA (grey line), a monophasic response is observed. At intermediate concentrations of CoA (60 µM; dashed black line), a biphasic curve representing some bound and some unbound WcbI is observed. (b) WcbI shows dose-dependent binding to CoA, as expected for a single tight-binding molecule. All experiments were performed in triplicate and the data are representative of at least three experiments. The black line represents the fit of the data according to (1).
Thermodynamic analysis of the binding of sugars, sugar nucleotides and CoA to WcbI by DSF experiments
| Ligands (1 m |
|
|---|---|
| No ligand | 37.4 ± 0.4 |
| CoA | 46.2 ± 0.2 |
| Acetyl-CoA | 45.6 ± 0.5 |
|
| 37.0 ± 0.1 |
|
| 37.1 ± 0.1 |
|
| 37.5 ± 0.3 |
|
| 37.0 ± 0.1 |
|
| 37.1 ± 0.1 |
| Cellubiose | 37.7 ± 0.2 |
| Polymannose | 36.2 ± 0.1 |
| GDP | 37.0 ± 0.1 |
| UDP | 36.9 ± 0.05 |
| GDP-mannose | 38.2 ± 1.0 |
The melting temperature T m is expressed as the mean ± SD and was determined in triplicate. The concentration of WcbI was 0.11 mg ml−1.
Figure 5WcbI shows no detectable acetyltransferase activity. (a) Acetyltransferase activity was measured using the DTNB assay. Each column represents an average of three measurements. The concentrations of acetyl-CoA and GDP-mannose were held constant at 1 and 4 mM, respectively. The same assay performed with chloramphenicol acetyltransferase and 2 mM chloramphenicol served as a positive control. Reactions in which recombinant WcbI and CAT were omitted served as a negative control. (b) Acetyltransferase activity was measured using a fluorescence-based activity assay. Concentrations of GDP-mannose ranging from 0 to 3 mM were used, with the WcbI concentration held constant. The positive control supplied in the kit was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. (c) Acetyltransferase activity was measured using a coupled assay with pyruvate dehydrogenase. Substrate concentrations were 0.5 mM for acetyl-CoA and 1 mM for GDP-mannose. The same assay was performed using CAT and 1 mM chloramphenicol as a positive control. A negative control was performed without either enzyme. The rates were calculated using the extinction coefficient for NADH. All columns represent the average ± standard deviation of two measurements.