| Literature DB >> 26527149 |
Michail N Isupov1, Ewald Schröder1, Robert P Gibson1, Jean Beecher1, Giuliana Donadio1, Vahid Saneei1, Stephlina A Dcunha1, Emma J McGhie1, Christopher Sayer1, Colin F Davenport1, Peter C Lau2, Yoshie Hasegawa3, Hiroaki Iwaki3, Maria Kadow4, Kathleen Balke4, Uwe T Bornscheuer4, Gleb Bourenkov5, Jennifer A Littlechild1.
Abstract
The three-dimensional structures of the native enzyme and theEntities:
Keywords: FMN-dependent monooxygenase; industrial biocatalysis; protein structure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26527149 PMCID: PMC4631483 DOI: 10.1107/S1399004715017939
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr ISSN: 0907-4449
Figure 1The camphor-degradation pathway (adapted from McGhie et al., 1998 ▸). The following enzymes are indicated: (1) 5-exo-hydroxylase (P450CAM), (2) and (3) exo-hydroxycamphor dehydrogenases, (4) 3,6-DKMO, (5) 2,5-DKMO.
Summary of data-collection, phasing and refinement statistics
Values in parentheses are for the outer resolution shell.
| Native bromide soak | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMN complex | Native | Peak | Inflection | Remote | |
| Data collection | |||||
| Space group |
|
|
| ||
| Unit-cell parameters () |
|
|
| ||
|
| 2.67 | 2.46 | 2.13 | ||
| Beamline | I04-1, Diamond | BW7B, DESY | BW6, DESY | ||
| Wavelength () | 0.9200 | 0.8443 | 0.9177 | 0.9201 | 0.8500 |
| Resolution () | 55.601.90 (1.951.90) | 20.441.93 (1.981.93) | 13.002.70 (2.752.70) | 13.002.75 (2.802.75) | 13.002.45 (2.492.45) |
| Completeness (%) | 99.5 (97.8) | 98.9 (88.3) | 99.1 (98.0) | 99.3 (99.4) | 97.1 (88.6) |
|
| 0.085 (0.95) | 0.127 (0.686) | 0.087 (0.253) | 0.091 (0.211) | 0.113 (0.319) |
|
| 14.9 (2.0) | 9.9 (2.0) | 14.9 (2.8) | 17.2 (6.3) | 9.5 (2.6) |
| Multiplicity | 6.7 (6.8) | 3.9 (3.4) | 3.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 |
| Wilson | 34.7 | 27.5 | 33.9 | 34.5 | 37.8 |
| Phasing | |||||
| No. of sites | 14 | ||||
| Phasing power | 1.28 | ||||
|
| 0.72 | ||||
| FOM | 0.26 | ||||
| Refinement | |||||
| Resolution () | 55.601.90 | 10.441.93 | |||
| No. of reflections | 71728 | 59253 | |||
|
| 18.5/22.1 | 17.1/22.1 | |||
| Refined residues | 725 | 728 | |||
| Ligand atoms | 62 | ||||
| Waters | 616 | 798 | |||
|
| |||||
| Protein | 33.0 | 26.0 | |||
| Ligand | 55.1 | ||||
| Water | 42.2 | 33.9 | |||
| R.m.s deviations | |||||
| Bond lengths () | 0.009 | 0.010 | |||
| Bond angles () | 1.2 | 1.2 | |||
| Ramachandran plot analysis | |||||
| Most favoured | 91.0 | 90.1 | |||
| Additionally allowed | 9.0 | 9.9 | |||
| Generously allowed | 0 | 0. | |||
| Disallowed | 0 | 0 | |||
I(+) and I() were scaled separately for anomalous data.
R merge = , where I(hkl) is the intensity of reflection hkl, is the sum over all reflections and is the sum over i measurements of the reflection.
Phasing power = F H/E, where E is the estimated lack-of-closure error.
R cullis = lack-of-closure error/isomorphous difference and is quoted for centric reflections only.
FOM is the overall figure of merit, defined as the estimated cosine of the phase error.
R cryst = .
The Wilson B factor was estimated by SFCHECK (Vaguine et al., 1999 ▸).
Ramachandran plot analysis was performed by PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1993 ▸).
Figure 2(a) Amino-acid sequence alignment of 3,6-DKMO with the α subunit of V. harveyi luciferase. The secondary-structure elements of 3,6-DKMO and luciferase are indicated above and below the alignment, respectively, as α-helices, η-helices (310-helices) and β-strands. The secondary-structure assignment and the figure were produced using ESPript (Robert & Gouet, 2014 ▸). (b) A cartoon representation of the dimeric molecule of 3,6-DKMO showing its classical α/β-barrel structure. The FMN cofactor is shown as a stick model. Figs. 2(b), 4(b) and 5 were prepared using CCP4mg (McNicholas et al., 2011 ▸)
Figure 3A stereo diagram of the active site of 3,6-DKMO viewed from the solvent region. The cofactor FMN, modelled with an occupancy of 0.6, and neighbouring residues are shown as stick models. The positive OMIT F o − F c electron-density map contoured at 3.0σ is shown in green and the negative F o − F c map contoured at 3.0σ is shown in red. The OMIT difference electron density was calculated by BUSTER using a structure from which all solvent and cofactor molecules had been removed and the model refined to reduce the bias. The figure was prepared using PyMOL (DeLano, 2002 ▸).
Figure 4(a) A schematic drawing of the interactions of the FMN in the active site of 3,6-DKMO. The figure was prepared by LigPlot+ (Laskowski & Swindells, 2011 ▸). (b) The electrostatic potential surface calculated for the subunit of 3,6-DKMO. Positive charge is shown in blue and negative charge in red. The active-site cavity can be seen in the centre of the figure. The cofactor FMN molecule is shown as a stick model at the bottom of the active-site pocket.
Figure 5A diagram showing the different orientation of the isoalloxazine ring of the FMN cofactor in the active sites of the superimposed α subunit of the bacterial luciferase and the 3,6-DKMO enzyme. The Cα backbones of luciferase and 3,6-DKMO are shown in ice blue and purple, respectively. The C atoms in the FMN cofactors are shown in yellow and green for luciferase and 3,6-DKMO, respectively.