| Literature DB >> 25070900 |
Shinichi Kuriyama1, Katsufumi Hyakuna2, Satoshi Inoue2, Yasuyuki Tamaki2, Hiromu Ito1, Shuichi Matsuda1.
Abstract
This study compared the accuracy of three methods to set tibial component rotational alignment: (1) conventional method, the anteroposterior (AP) axis was determined by the surgeon using anatomical landmarks; (2) partial-navigation method, the tibia was prepared according to the AP axis using a CT-based navigation system and the component was manually positioned; (3) full-navigation method, the tibial component was positioned and fixed with cement under the control of navigation using a newly developed instrument. The conventional method showed considerable deviation (range, -18.6° to 14.7°), and the partial-navigation method also showed considerable deviation (-11.3° to 8.1°). In contrast, the full-navigation method significantly improved the accuracy of alignment (-2.9° to 2.1°). The tibial component can become malaligned during cement fixation, even after proper bone preparation.Keywords: CT-based navigation system; developed instrument; rotational alignment; tibial component; total knee arthroplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25070900 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757