Literature DB >> 25069848

[Histological grading of epithelial ovarian cancer. Review and recommendation].

S Hauptmann1, A du Bois, I Meinhold-Herlein, J Pfisterer, S Avril.   

Abstract

Histological grading of ovarian cancer has prognostic relevance and implications for treatment decisions. No standardized grading system has been established so far. Several grading systems are currently being used, including the FIGO, WHO, and Silverberg grading systems which cannot be directly translated into each other. Furthermore, individual grading criteria are not uniformly applicable to different histological subtypes. For serous ovarian cancer a binary grading system is now in use as the distinction between low-grade versus high-grade carcinomas reflects the different pathogenesis of these entities. Uniform guidelines for grading ovarian cancer are necessary and should ideally reflect the prognosis. This article provides an overview of commonly used grading systems and their prognostic value. The article demonstrates that a type-specific grading of ovarian cancer should be performed and recommendations for grading the various histological subtypes are given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25069848     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-014-1948-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  34 in total

1.  Grading of serous ovarian carcinoma: further evidence of a lack of agreement between conventional grading systems.

Authors:  N Singh; A Ayhan; U Menon; J A Chin Aleong; A Z Faruqi; S A Gayther; I J Jacobs
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Prognostic relevance of uncommon ovarian histology in women with stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Helen J Mackay; Mark F Brady; Amit M Oza; Alexander Reuss; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Ann M Swart; Nadeem Siddiqui; Nicoletta Colombo; Michael A Bookman; Jacobus Pfisterer; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis.

Authors:  W Glenn McCluggage
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.306

4.  Gene expression analysis identifies two groups of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas with different prognosis.

Authors:  Inigo Espinosa; Lluis Catasus; Belén Canet; Emanuela D'Angelo; Josefina Muñoz; Jaime Prat
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 5.  Management and prognosis of endometrioid borderline tumors of the ovary.

Authors:  C Uzan; R Berretta; M Rolla; S Gouy; R Fauvet; E Darai; P Duvillard; P Morice
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.279

6.  Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 196 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas, including an evaluation of 11 cases with 'pseudomyxoma peritonei'.

Authors:  K R Lee; R E Scully
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Histological grading in a large series of advanced stage ovarian carcinomas by three widely used grading systems: consistent lack of prognostic significance. A translational research subprotocol of a prospective randomized phase III study (AGO-OVAR 3 protocol).

Authors:  Stefan Kommoss; Dietmar Schmidt; Friedrich Kommoss; Juergen Hedderich; Philipp Harter; Jacobus Pfisterer; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis.

Authors:  Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. I. Prognostic significance of histopathologic features--problems involved in the architectural grading system.

Authors:  Y Shimizu; S Kamoi; S Amada; K Hasumi; F Akiyama; S G Silverberg
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Anais Malpica; Michael T Deavers; Carmen Tornos; Robert J Kurman; Robert Soslow; Jeffrey D Seidman; Mark F Munsell; Erich Gaertner; David Frishberg; Elvio G Silva
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical significance and prognostic value of Forkhead box A1 expression in human epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Chenan Guan; Chenyan Fang; Xiaoxiao Jin; Junhui Yu; Yuquan Zhang; Lingzhi Zheng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  [Grading of gynecological tumors : Current aspects].

Authors:  L-C Horn; D Mayr; C E Brambs; J Einenkel; I Sändig; K Schierle
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO: The New FIGO and WHO Classifications of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Cancer.

Authors:  I Meinhold-Heerlein; C Fotopoulou; P Harter; C Kurzeder; A Mustea; P Wimberger; S Hauptmann; J Sehouli
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.915

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.