Literature DB >> 17667538

Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma.

Anais Malpica1, Michael T Deavers, Carmen Tornos, Robert J Kurman, Robert Soslow, Jeffrey D Seidman, Mark F Munsell, Erich Gaertner, David Frishberg, Elvio G Silva.   

Abstract

Although grading has been demonstrated to be an important prognostic factor in ovarian serous carcinoma, there is no system universally used to perform this task. A few years ago, we proposed a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma that is based primarily on the assessment of nuclear atypia (uniformity vs. pleomorphism) in the worst area of the tumor. Tumor grade in this two-tier system is correlated with survival. After being used by numerous pathologists and trainees at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) for 15 years, we have observed that this system is user-friendly and reproducible. We undertook this study to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver variability among a group of 7 gynecologic pathologists and 2 general surgical pathologists using this grading system. A total of 80 cases of ovarian serous carcinoma, 40 low-grade and 40 high-grade, were circulated twice among these pathologists. Slides with examples of low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma were sent with the unknowns. A website was used to provide diagnostic criteria, images of examples of ovarian low-grade and high-grade carcinoma, and a log form to facilitate data entry. Statistical analysis demonstrated an overall kappa statistic among the different observers of 0.909. The intergrader kappa's ranged from 0.717 to 1.000 in the first round of the review and from 0.701 to 1.000 in the second round. Eight of the participants had an intragrader kappa ranging from 0.775 to 1.000 (excellent agreement), whereas a single participant had an intragrader kappa of 0.725 (good agreement). This study demonstrates that the two-tier grading system (the MDACC grading system) for ovarian serous carcinoma on the basis of the assessment of nuclear atypia is easy to learn and is highly reproducible. These findings would support its universal use, which would be beneficial for the standardization of clinical trials and protocols, thus facilitating the understanding of this disease and investigation into the treatment of patients affected by these tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17667538     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31803199b0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  33 in total

Review 1.  Epithelial ovarian carcinoma: current evidences and future perspectives in the first-line setting.

Authors:  Antonio González-Martín; Gemma Toledo; Luis Chiva
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Hormonal therapy for recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum.

Authors:  David M Gershenson; Charlotte C Sun; Revathy B Iyer; Anais L Malpica; John J Kavanagh; Diane C Bodurka; Kathleen Schmeler; Michael Deavers
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 4.  [Histological grading of epithelial ovarian cancer. Review and recommendation].

Authors:  S Hauptmann; A du Bois; I Meinhold-Herlein; J Pfisterer; S Avril
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  The insulin-like growth factor 1 pathway is a potential therapeutic target for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Erin R King; Zhifei Zu; Yvonne T M Tsang; Michael T Deavers; Anais Malpica; Samuel C Mok; David M Gershenson; Kwong-Kwok Wong
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  [The 2016 update of the S3 guideline for malignant tumours of the ovary : Role of pathology in diagnosis, therapy and clinical management of epithelial tumours].

Authors:  A Staebler; D Mayr
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 7.  [Pitfalls and common problems in the differential diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors].

Authors:  S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 8.  Better therapeutic trials in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Bookman; C Blake Gilks; Elise C Kohn; Karen O Kaplan; David Huntsman; Carol Aghajanian; Michael J Birrer; Jonathan A Ledermann; Amit M Oza; Kenneth D Swenerton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Histological grading in a large series of advanced stage ovarian carcinomas by three widely used grading systems: consistent lack of prognostic significance. A translational research subprotocol of a prospective randomized phase III study (AGO-OVAR 3 protocol).

Authors:  Stefan Kommoss; Dietmar Schmidt; Friedrich Kommoss; Juergen Hedderich; Philipp Harter; Jacobus Pfisterer; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Molecular abnormalities in ovarian cancer subtypes other than high-grade serous carcinoma.

Authors:  C Blake Gilks
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.