Literature DB >> 25067933

Efficient network meta-analysis: a confidence distribution approach.

Guang Yang1, Dungang Liu2, Regina Y Liu1, Minge Xie1, David C Hoaglin3.   

Abstract

Network meta-analysis synthesizes several studies of multiple treatment comparisons to simultaneously provide inference for all treatments in the network. It can often strengthen inference on pairwise comparisons by borrowing evidence from other comparisons in the network. Current network meta-analysis approaches are derived from either conventional pairwise meta-analysis or hierarchical Bayesian methods. This paper introduces a new approach for network meta-analysis by combining confidence distributions (CDs). Instead of combining point estimators from individual studies in the conventional approach, the new approach combines CDs which contain richer information than point estimators and thus achieves greater efficiency in its inference. The proposed CD approach can e ciently integrate all studies in the network and provide inference for all treatments even when individual studies contain only comparisons of subsets of the treatments. Through numerical studies with real and simulated data sets, the proposed approach is shown to outperform or at least equal the traditional pairwise meta-analysis and a commonly used Bayesian hierarchical model. Although the Bayesian approach may yield comparable results with a suitably chosen prior, it is highly sensitive to the choice of priors (especially the prior of the between-trial covariance structure), which is often subjective. The CD approach is a general frequentist approach and is prior-free. Moreover, it can always provide a proper inference for all the treatment effects regardless of the between-trial covariance structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confidence distribution; Mixed treatment comparisons; Multiple treatment comparison; Network meta-analysis; Random-effects model

Year:  2014        PMID: 25067933      PMCID: PMC4109833          DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2014.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methodol        ISSN: 1572-3127


  21 in total

Review 1.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

2.  Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons.

Authors:  Thomas Lumley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.

Authors:  Kurex Sidik; Jeffrey N Jonkman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta-analyses.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian R White; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Exact and efficient inference procedure for meta-analysis and its application to the analysis of independent 2 x 2 tables with all available data but without artificial continuity correction.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Marc A Pfeffer; Nikita Piankov; Pierre-Yves Cremieux; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Comparison of statistical inferences from the DerSimonian-Laird and alternative random-effects model meta-analyses - an empirical assessment of 920 Cochrane primary outcome meta-analyses.

Authors:  Kristian Thorlund; Jørn Wetterslev; Tahany Awad; Lehana Thabane; Christian Gluud
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 5.273

7.  Exact meta-analysis approach for discrete data and its application to 2 × 2 tables with rare events.

Authors:  Dungang Liu; Regina Y Liu; Minge Xie
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

9.  Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Dias; N J Welton; D M Caldwell; A E Ades
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christoph Stettler; Simon Wandel; Sabin Allemann; Adnan Kastrati; Marie Claude Morice; Albert Schömig; Matthias E Pfisterer; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; José Suarez de Lezo; Jean-Jacques Goy; Seung-Jung Park; Manel Sabaté; Maarten J Suttorp; Henning Kelbaek; Christian Spaulding; Maurizio Menichelli; Paul Vermeersch; Maurits T Dirksen; Pavel Cervinka; Anna Sonia Petronio; Alain J Nordmann; Peter Diem; Bernhard Meier; Marcel Zwahlen; Stephan Reichenbach; Sven Trelle; Stephan Windecker; Peter Jüni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.

Authors:  Michael P Fay; Michael A Proschan; Erica Brittain
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A CD-based mapping method for combining multiple related parameters from heterogeneous intervention trials.

Authors:  Yang Jiao; Eun-Young Mun; Thomas A Trikalinos; Minge Xie
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 0.582

3.  On evidence cycles in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu; James S Hodges
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 0.582

4.  A Distributed and Integrated Method of Moments for High-Dimensional Correlated Data Analysis.

Authors:  Emily C Hector; Peter X-K Song
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.033

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.