Literature DB >> 18922759

Exact and efficient inference procedure for meta-analysis and its application to the analysis of independent 2 x 2 tables with all available data but without artificial continuity correction.

Lu Tian1, Tianxi Cai, Marc A Pfeffer, Nikita Piankov, Pierre-Yves Cremieux, L J Wei.   

Abstract

Recently, meta-analysis has been widely utilized to combine information across comparative clinical studies for evaluating drug efficacy or safety profile. When dealing with rather rare events, a substantial proportion of studies may not have any events of interest. Conventional methods either exclude such studies or add an arbitrary positive value to each cell of the corresponding 2 x 2 tables in the analysis. In this article, we present a simple, effective procedure to make valid inferences about the parameter of interest with all available data without artificial continuity corrections. We then use the procedure to analyze the data from 48 comparative trials involving rosiglitazone with respect to its possible cardiovascular toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18922759      PMCID: PMC2648899          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  7 in total

1.  Test-based exact confidence intervals for the difference of two binomial proportions.

Authors:  I S Chan; Z Zhang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Combining dependent tests for linkage or association across multiple phenotypic traits.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Lu Tian; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.

Authors:  Michael J Sweeting; Alexander J Sutton; Paul C Lambert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events.

Authors:  Michael J Bradburn; Jonathan J Deeks; Jesse A Berlin; A Russell Localio
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Meta-Analysis. Potentials and promise.

Authors:  M Egger; G D Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-22

6.  Meta-analysis: principles and procedures.

Authors:  M Egger; G D Smith; A N Phillips
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-12-06

7.  Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen; Kathy Wolski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total
  23 in total

1.  Efficient network meta-analysis: a confidence distribution approach.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Dungang Liu; Regina Y Liu; Minge Xie; David C Hoaglin
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2014-09-01

2.  Drug safety meta-analysis: promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael A Stoto
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Exact meta-analysis approach for discrete data and its application to 2 × 2 tables with rare events.

Authors:  Dungang Liu; Regina Y Liu; Minge Xie
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Real-world Performance of Meta-analysis Methods for Double-Zero-Event Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes Using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Yanan Ren; Lifeng Lin; Qinshu Lian; Hui Zou; Haitao Chu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Fibrinogen concentrate in surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marano; Carlo Mengoli; Massimo Franchini; Stefania Vaglio; Sara Gentili; Simonetta Pupella; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Meta-analysis for rare events.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Layla Parast; Louise Ryan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Safety of intravenous tranexamic acid in patients undergoing majororthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Massimo Franchini; Carlo Mengoli; Marco Marietta; Giuseppe Marano; Stefania Vaglio; Simonetta Pupella; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Lei Nie; Yong Chen; Yi Huang; Wei Sun
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Challenging Assumptions About African American Participation in Alzheimer Disease Trials.

Authors:  Richard E Kennedy; Gary R Cutter; Guoqiao Wang; Lon S Schneider
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  Meta-analysis of rare adverse events in randomized clinical trials: Bayesian and frequentist methods.

Authors:  Hwanhee Hong; Chenguang Wang; Gary L Rosner
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.