Literature DB >> 25066365

Global biogeochemical implications of mercury discharges from rivers and sediment burial.

Helen M Amos1, Daniel J Jacob, David Kocman, Hannah M Horowitz, Yanxu Zhang, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Milena Horvat, Elizabeth S Corbitt, David P Krabbenhoft, Elsie M Sunderland.   

Abstract

Rivers are an important source of mercury (Hg) to marine ecosystems. Based on an analysis of compiled observations, we estimate global present-day Hg discharges from rivers to ocean margins are 27 ± 13 Mmol a(-1) (5500 ± 2700 Mg a(-1)), of which 28% reaches the open ocean and the rest is deposited to ocean margin sediments. Globally, the source of Hg to the open ocean from rivers amounts to 30% of atmospheric inputs. This is larger than previously estimated due to accounting for elevated concentrations in Asian rivers and variability in offshore transport across different types of estuaries. Riverine inputs of Hg to the North Atlantic have decreased several-fold since the 1970s while inputs to the North Pacific have increased. These trends have large effects on Hg concentrations at ocean margins but are too small in the open ocean to explain observed declines of seawater concentrations in the North Atlantic or increases in the North Pacific. Burial of Hg in ocean margin sediments represents a major sink in the global Hg biogeochemical cycle that has not been previously considered. We find that including this sink in a fully coupled global biogeochemical box model helps to balance the large anthropogenic release of Hg from commercial products recently added to global inventories. It also implies that legacy anthropogenic Hg can be removed from active environmental cycling on a faster time scale (centuries instead of millennia). Natural environmental Hg levels are lower than previously estimated, implying a relatively larger impact from human activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25066365     DOI: 10.1021/es502134t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  25 in total

1.  Mercury profiles in sediment from the marginal high of Arabian Sea: an indicator of increasing anthropogenic Hg input.

Authors:  Parthasarathi Chakraborty; Krushna Vudamala; Kartheek Chennuri; Kazip Armoury; P Linsy; Darwin Ramteke; Tyson Sebastian; Saranya Jayachandran; Chandan Naik; Richita Naik; B Nagender Nath
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Long-term dynamics of total mercury in surficial bottom sediments of the Volga River's reservoir in central Russia.

Authors:  Yury G Udodenko; Viktor T Komov; Viktor V Zakonnov
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions.

Authors:  Yanxu Zhang; Daniel J Jacob; Hannah M Horowitz; Long Chen; Helen M Amos; David P Krabbenhoft; Franz Slemr; Vincent L St Louis; Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Benefits of mercury controls for the United States.

Authors:  Amanda Giang; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Eurasian river spring flood observations support net Arctic Ocean mercury export to the atmosphere and Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Jeroen E Sonke; Roman Teisserenc; Lars-Eric Heimbürger-Boavida; Mariia V Petrova; Nicolas Marusczak; Theo Le Dantec; Artem V Chupakov; Chuxian Li; Colin P Thackray; Elsie M Sunderland; Nikita Tananaev; Oleg S Pokrovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Impact of Water-Induced Soil Erosion on the Terrestrial Transport and Atmospheric Emission of Mercury in China.

Authors:  Maodian Liu; Qianru Zhang; Yao Luo; Robert P Mason; Shidong Ge; Yipeng He; Chenghao Yu; Rina Sa; Hanlin Cao; Xuejun Wang; Long Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Impacts of farmed fish consumption and food trade on methylmercury exposure in China.

Authors:  Maodian Liu; Long Chen; Yipeng He; Zofia Baumann; Robert P Mason; Huizhong Shen; Chenghao Yu; Wei Zhang; Qianggong Zhang; Xuejun Wang
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Mercury risk to avian piscivores across western United States and Canada.

Authors:  Allyson Jackson; David C Evers; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Joshua T Ackerman; James J Willacker; John E Elliott; Jesse M Lepak; Stacy S Vander Pol; Colleen E Bryan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Global and Local Impacts of Delayed Mercury Mitigation Efforts.

Authors:  Hélène Angot; Nicholas Hoffman; Amanda Giang; Colin P Thackray; Ashley N Hendricks; Noel R Urban; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Patterns in forage fish mercury concentrations across Northeast US estuaries.

Authors:  Kate L Buckman; Robert P Mason; Emily Seelen; Vivien F Taylor; Prentiss H Balcom; Jonathan Chipman; Celia Y Chen
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 6.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.