Literature DB >> 26712021

Benefits of mercury controls for the United States.

Amanda Giang1, Noelle E Selin2.   

Abstract

Mercury pollution poses risks for both human and ecosystem health. As a consequence, controlling mercury pollution has become a policy goal on both global and national scales. We developed an assessment method linking global-scale atmospheric chemical transport modeling to regional-scale economic modeling to consistently evaluate the potential benefits to the United States of global (UN Minamata Convention on Mercury) and domestic [Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS)] policies, framed as economic gains from avoiding mercury-related adverse health endpoints. This method attempts to trace the policies-to-impacts path while taking into account uncertainties and knowledge gaps with policy-appropriate bounding assumptions. We project that cumulative lifetime benefits from the Minamata Convention for individuals affected by 2050 are $339 billion (2005 USD), with a range from $1.4 billion to $575 billion in our sensitivity scenarios. Cumulative economy-wide benefits to the United States, realized by 2050, are $104 billion, with a range from $6 million to $171 billion. Projected Minamata benefits are more than twice those projected from the domestic policy. This relative benefit is robust to several uncertainties and variabilities, with the ratio of benefits (Minamata/MATS) ranging from ≈1.4 to 3. However, we find that for those consuming locally caught freshwater fish from the United States, rather than marine and estuarine fish from the global market, benefits are larger from US than global action, suggesting domestic policies are important for protecting these populations. Per megagram of prevented emissions, our domestic policy scenario results in US benefits about an order of magnitude higher than from our global scenario, further highlighting the importance of domestic action.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minamata Convention; economic benefits; impacts assessment; mercury; policy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26712021      PMCID: PMC4720344          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514395113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition.

Authors:  Reed C Harris; John W M Rudd; Marc Amyot; Christopher L Babiarz; Ken G Beaty; Paul J Blanchfield; R A Bodaly; Brian A Branfireun; Cynthia C Gilmour; Jennifer A Graydon; Andrew Heyes; Holger Hintelmann; James P Hurley; Carol A Kelly; David P Krabbenhoft; Steve E Lindberg; Robert P Mason; Michael J Paterson; Cheryl L Podemski; Art Robinson; Ken A Sandilands; George R Southworth; Vincent L St Louis; Michael T Tate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Projections of global mercury emissions in 2050.

Authors:  David G Streets; Qiang Zhang; Ye Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Application of ecosystem-scale fate and bioaccumulation models to predict fish mercury response times to changes in atmospheric deposition.

Authors:  Christopher D Knightes; Elsie M Sunderland; M Craig Barber; John M Johnston; Robert B Ambrose
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Global health impacts and costs due to mercury emissions.

Authors:  Joseph V Spadaro; Ari Rabl
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 5.  Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: evaluating the risks and the benefits.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Eric B Rimm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Mercury, fish oils, and risk of acute coronary events and cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and all-cause mortality in men in eastern Finland.

Authors:  Jyrki K Virtanen; Sari Voutilainen; Tiina H Rissanen; Jaakko Mursu; Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen; Maarit J Korhonen; Veli-Pekka Valkonen; Kari Seppänen; Jari A Laukkanen; Jukka T Salonen
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 8.311

7.  Public health and economic consequences of methyl mercury toxicity to the developing brain.

Authors:  Leonardo Trasande; Philip J Landrigan; Clyde Schechter
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Mercury exposure from domestic and imported estuarine and marine fish in the U.S. seafood market.

Authors:  Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Adult women's blood mercury concentrations vary regionally in the United States: association with patterns of fish consumption (NHANES 1999-2004).

Authors:  Kathryn R Mahaffey; Robert P Clickner; Rebecca A Jeffries
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  A comparison of the monetized impact of IQ decrements from mercury emissions.

Authors:  Charles Griffiths; Al McGartland; Maggie Miller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  14 in total

1.  Impacts of farmed fish consumption and food trade on methylmercury exposure in China.

Authors:  Maodian Liu; Long Chen; Yipeng He; Zofia Baumann; Robert P Mason; Huizhong Shen; Chenghao Yu; Wei Zhang; Qianggong Zhang; Xuejun Wang
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Costs of IQ Loss from Leaded Aviation Gasoline Emissions.

Authors:  Philip J Wolfe; Amanda Giang; Akshay Ashok; Noelle E Selin; Steven R H Barrett
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Traditional Tibetan Medicine Induced High Methylmercury Exposure Level and Environmental Mercury Burden in Tibet, China.

Authors:  Maodian Liu; Yipeng He; Zofia Baumann; Chenghao Yu; Shidong Ge; Xuejun Sun; Menghan Cheng; Huizhong Shen; Robert P Mason; Long Chen; Qianggong Zhang; Xuejun Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Global and Local Impacts of Delayed Mercury Mitigation Efforts.

Authors:  Hélène Angot; Nicholas Hoffman; Amanda Giang; Colin P Thackray; Ashley N Hendricks; Noel R Urban; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Trans-provincial health impacts of atmospheric mercury emissions in China.

Authors:  Long Chen; Sai Liang; Maodian Liu; Yujun Yi; Zhifu Mi; Yanxu Zhang; Yumeng Li; Jianchuan Qi; Jing Meng; Xi Tang; Haoran Zhang; Yindong Tong; Wei Zhang; Xuejun Wang; Jiong Shu; Zhifeng Yang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Socio-economic analysis in REACH restriction dossiers for chemicals management: A critical review.

Authors:  Silke Gabbert; Isabel Hilber
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Global health effects of future atmospheric mercury emissions.

Authors:  Yanxu Zhang; Zhengcheng Song; Shaojian Huang; Peng Zhang; Yiming Peng; Peipei Wu; Jing Gu; Stephanie Dutkiewicz; Huanxin Zhang; Shiliang Wu; Feiyue Wang; Long Chen; Shuxiao Wang; Ping Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Linking science and policy to support the implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury.

Authors:  Henrik Selin; Susan Egan Keane; Shuxiao Wang; Noelle E Selin; Kenneth Davis; Dominique Bally
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Integrating mercury research and policy in a changing world.

Authors:  Celia Y Chen; Charles T Driscoll
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

10.  Exposure to Inorganic Mercury Causes Oxidative Stress, Cell Death, and Functional Deficits in the Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Francisco B Teixeira; Ana C A de Oliveira; Luana K R Leão; Nathália C F Fagundes; Rafael M Fernandes; Luanna M P Fernandes; Márcia C F da Silva; Lilian L Amado; Fernanda E S Sagica; Edivaldo H C de Oliveira; Maria E Crespo-Lopez; Cristiane S F Maia; Rafael R Lima
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.