Literature DB >> 33358725

Patterns in forage fish mercury concentrations across Northeast US estuaries.

Kate L Buckman1, Robert P Mason2, Emily Seelen2, Vivien F Taylor3, Prentiss H Balcom2, Jonathan Chipman4, Celia Y Chen5.   

Abstract

Biogeochemical conditions and landscape can have strong influences on mercury bioaccumulation in fish, but these effects across regional scales and between sites with and without point sources of contamination are not well understood. Normal means clustering, a type of unsupervised machine learning, was used to analyze relationships between forage fish (Fundulus heteroclitus and Menidia menidia) mercury (Hg) concentrations and sediment and water column Hg and methylmercury (MeHg) concentrations, ancillary variables, and land classifications within the sub-watershed. The analysis utilized data from 38 sites in 8 estuarine systems in the Northeast US, collected over five years. A large range of mercury concentrations and land use proportions were observed across sites. The cluster correlations indicated that for Fundulus, benthic and pelagic Hg and MeHg concentrations were most related to tissue concentrations, while Menidia Hg was most related to water column MeHg, reflecting differing feeding modes between the species. For both species, dissolved MeHg was most related to tissue concentrations, with sediment Hg concentrations influential at contaminated sites. The models considering only uncontaminated sites showed reduced influence of bulk sediment MeHg for both species, but Fundulus retained sediment drivers at some sites, with dissolved MeHg still highly correlated for both. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), chlorophyll, land use, and other ancillary variables were of lesser importance in driving bioaccumulation, though DOC was strongly related within some clusters, likely in relation to dissolved Hg. Land use, though not of primary importance, showed relationships opposite to those observed in freshwater, with development positively correlated and forests and agriculture negatively correlated with tissue concentrations across clusters and species. Clusters were composed of sites from geographically distinct systems, indicating the greater importance of small scale drivers of MeHg formation and uptake into the food web over system or region-wide influences.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biogeochemistry; Estuary; Fish; Landscape; Methylmercury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33358725      PMCID: PMC7946743          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  38 in total

1.  Effects of urbanization on mercury deposition and accumulation in New England.

Authors:  Ann T Chalmers; David P Krabbenhoft; Peter C Van Metre; Mark A Nilles
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Mercury in western North America: A synthesis of environmental contamination, fluxes, bioaccumulation, and risk to fish and wildlife.

Authors:  Collin A Eagles-Smith; James G Wiener; Chris S Eckley; James J Willacker; David C Evers; Mark Marvin-DiPasquale; Daniel Obrist; Jacob A Fleck; George R Aiken; Jesse M Lepak; Allyson K Jackson; Jackson P Webster; A Robin Stewart; Jay A Davis; Charles N Alpers; Joshua T Ackerman
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Mercury in fish from streams and rivers in New York State: Spatial patterns, temporal changes, and environmental drivers.

Authors:  Karen Riva-Murray; Wayne Richter; N Roxanna Razavi; Douglas A Burns; Lisa B Cleckner; Mark Burton; Scott D George; Douglas Freehafer
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Role of Sediment Resuspension on Estuarine Suspended Particulate Mercury Dynamics.

Authors:  Emily A Seelen; Grace M Massey; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Formation of artifact methylmercury during extraction from a sediment reference material.

Authors:  C R Hammerschmidt; W F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Environmental Origins of Methylmercury Accumulated in Subarctic Estuarine Fish Indicated by Mercury Stable Isotopes.

Authors:  Miling Li; Amina T Schartup; Amelia P Valberg; Jessica D Ewald; David P Krabbenhoft; Runsheng Yin; Prentiss H Balcom; Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Integrated mercury monitoring program for temperate estuarine and marine ecosystems on the North American Atlantic coast.

Authors:  David C Evers; Robert P Mason; Neil C Kamman; Celia Y Chen; Andrea L Bogomolni; David L Taylor; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Stephen H Jones; Neil M Burgess; Kenneth Munney; Katharine C Parsons
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.184

8.  Methylmercury bioaccumulation in an urban estuary: Delaware River USA.

Authors:  Kate Buckman; Vivien Taylor; Hannah Broadley; Daniel Hocking; Prentiss Balcom; Rob Mason; Keith Nislow; Celia Chen
Journal:  Estuaries Coast       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.976

9.  Toward an Assessment of the Global Inventory of Present-Day Mercury Releases to Freshwater Environments.

Authors:  David Kocman; Simon J Wilson; Helen M Amos; Kevin H Telmer; Frits Steenhuisen; Elsie M Sunderland; Robert P Mason; Peter Outridge; Milena Horvat
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Molecular composition of organic matter controls methylmercury formation in boreal lakes.

Authors:  Andrea G Bravo; Sylvain Bouchet; Julie Tolu; Erik Björn; Alejandro Mateos-Rivera; Stefan Bertilsson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  BMAA, Methylmercury, and Mechanisms of Neurodegeneration in Dolphins: A Natural Model of Toxin Exposure.

Authors:  David A Davis; Susanna P Garamszegi; Sandra Anne Banack; Patrick D Dooley; Thomas M Coyne; Dylan W McLean; David S Rotstein; Deborah C Mash; Paul Alan Cox
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.