Literature DB >> 25065114

Complexity complicates lean: lessons from seven emergency services.

Pamela Mazzocato, Johan Thor, Ulrika Bäckman, Mats Brommels, Jan Carlsson, Fredrik Jonsson, Magnus Hagmar, Carl Savage.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to explain how different emergency services adopt and adapt the same hospital-wide lean-inspired intervention and how this is reflected in hospital process performance data. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A multiple case study based on a realistic evaluation approach to identify mechanisms for how lean impacts process performance and services' capability to learn and continually improve. Four years of process performance data were collected from seven emergency services at a Swedish University Hospital: ear, nose and throat (ENT) (two), pediatrics (two), gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery. Performance patterns were linked with qualitative data collected through realist interviews.
FINDINGS: The complexity of the care process influenced how improvement in access to care was achieved. For less complex care processes (ENT and gynecology), large and sustained improvement was mainly the result of a better match between capacity and demand. For medicine, surgery, and pediatrics, which exhibit greater care process complexity, sustainable, or continual improvement were constrained because the changes implemented were insufficient in addressing the higher degree of complexity. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The variation in process performance and sustainability of results indicate that lean efforts should be carefully adapted to the complexity of the care process and to the educational commitment of healthcare organizations. Ultimately, the ability to adapt lean to a particular context of application depends on the development of routines that effectively support learning from daily practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25065114     DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2013-0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Organ Manag        ISSN: 1477-7266


  22 in total

1.  Healthcare workers' perceptions of lean: a context-sensitive, mixed methods study in three Swedish hospitals.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Andrea Eriksson; Jörgen Andreasson; Anna Williamsson; Lotta Dellve
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Evaluation of an Access-Risk-Knowledge (ARK) Platform for Governance of Risk and Change in Complex Socio-Technical Systems.

Authors:  Nick McDonald; Lucy McKenna; Rebecca Vining; Brian Doyle; Junli Liang; Marie E Ward; Pernilla Ulfvengren; Una Geary; John Guilfoyle; Arwa Shuhaiber; Julio Hernandez; Mary Fogarty; Una Healy; Christopher Tallon; Rob Brennan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Lean thinking in health and nursing: an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Aline Lima Pestana Magalhães; Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann; Elza Lima da Silva; José Luís Guedes Dos Santos
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-08-08

4.  Emergency surgery in the elderly: the balance between function, frailty, fatality and futility.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kari F Desserud
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Kaizen practice in healthcare: a qualitative analysis of hospital employees' suggestions for improvement.

Authors:  Pamela Mazzocato; Terese Stenfors-Hayes; Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz; Henna Hasson; Monica Elisabeth Nyström
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The three paradoxes of patient flow: an explanatory case study.

Authors:  Sara A Kreindler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  A questionnaire measuring staff perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare: development and psychometric testing.

Authors:  Monica Kaltenbrunner; Lars Bengtsson; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Maria Engström
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Lean interventions in healthcare: do they actually work? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  John Moraros; Mark Lemstra; Chijioke Nwankwo
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 2.038

9.  Does lean muddy the quality improvement waters? A qualitative study of how a hospital management team understands lean in the context of quality improvement.

Authors:  Carl Savage; Louise Parke; Mia von Knorring; Pamela Mazzocato
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Six ways not to improve patient flow: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sara Adi Kreindler
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.