Literature DB >> 25065007

Measurement properties of the Disability Rating Index in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Helen Parsons1, Julie Bruce2, Juul Achten2, Matthew L Costa2, Nicholas R Parsons2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish and validate the measurement properties of the Disability Rating Index (DRI) in a population of adults undergoing hip replacement.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six adults participating in a randomized controlled trial completed the Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score, DRI and EuroQol Group-Five Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaires at four time points. The structural validity of the DRI was assessed using principal component analysis. Cronbach's α was used to determine the internal consistency and scale reliability was also assessed. Correlation between the DRI and the other functional and health-related quality of life scales was used to check criterion validity. DRI responsiveness was estimated and the interpretability of the scale was also assessed by checking for edge effects.
RESULTS: Results of analyses showed that the DRI was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.92), had good association with both function-specific and general health-related quality of life scores and was sensitive to change (smallest detectable change = 2.7). No evidence of edge effects was found. Furthermore, structural assessment of the DRI revealed two novel subscales representing simple tasks and difficult tasks.
CONCLUSIONS: The DRI is structurally valid, responsive and concurs with functional assessment in adults undergoing hip replacement.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRI; disability evaluation; patient reported outcomes; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25065007      PMCID: PMC4269794          DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  32 in total

Review 1.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.

Authors:  Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires.

Authors:  Margaret Grotle; Jens I Brox; Nina K Vøllestad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis Revicki; Ron D Hays; David Cella; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Reliability and construct validity of self-report questionnaires for patients with pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Margreth Grotle; Andrew M Garratt; Hanne Krogstad Jenssen; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-20

5.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr; D Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-03

6.  The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist.

Authors:  K Thorborg; P Hölmich; R Christensen; J Petersen; E M Roos
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: Results from a prospective multinational study.

Authors:  F Tubach; P Ravaud; E Martin-Mola; H Awada; N Bellamy; C Bombardier; D T Felson; N Hajjaj-Hassouni; M Hochberg; I Logeart; M Matucci-Cerinic; M van de Laar; D van der Heijde; M Dougados
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  Is Pain Intensity Really That Important to Assess in Chronic Pain Patients? A Study Based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP).

Authors:  Maria Bromley Milton; Björn Börsbo; Graciela Rovner; Asa Lundgren-Nilsson; Katharina Stibrant-Sunnerhagen; Björn Gerdle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?

Authors:  Kim E Wamper; Inger N Sierevelt; Rudolf W Poolman; Mohit Bhandari; Daniël Haverkamp
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthew L Costa; Juul Achten; Nicholas R Parsons; Richard P Edlin; Pedro Foguet; Udai Prakash; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-19
View more
  7 in total

1.  [Intramedullary versus extramedullary stabilization of distal extra-articular tibial fractures : The UK FixDT trial (ISRCTN99771224)].

Authors:  Dirk Stengel; Wolf Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Effect of Locking Plate Fixation vs Intramedullary Nail Fixation on 6-Month Disability Among Adults With Displaced Fracture of the Distal Tibia: The UK FixDT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matthew L Costa; Juul Achten; James Griffin; Stavros Petrou; Ian Pallister; Sarah E Lamb; Nick R Parsons
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Functional outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) using uncemented distally loading femoral stem for failed fixation of proximal femoral nail - A case series.

Authors:  Hemant H Mathur; Harsh S Shah; Karthik Vishwanathan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-06

4.  Musculoskeletal signs in female homecare personnel: A longitudinal epidemiological study.

Authors:  Gunnar Lundberg; Björn Gerdle
Journal:  Work       Date:  2017

5.  A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults.

Authors:  Lydia Flett; Joy Adamson; Elizabeth Barron; Stephen Brealey; Belen Corbacho; Matthew L Costa; Graham Gedney; Nikolaos Giotakis; Catherine Hewitt; Jessica Hugill-Jones; Deborah Hukins; Ada Keding; Catriona McDaid; Alex Mitchell; Matthew Northgraves; Grace O'Carroll; Adwoa Parker; Arabella Scantlebury; Lynne Stobbart; David Torgerson; Emma Turner; Charlie Welch; Hemant Sharma
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-03

6.  Health effects of direct triaging to physiotherapists in primary care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lena Bornhöft; Maria Eh Larsson; Lena Nordeman; Robert Eggertsen; Jörgen Thorn
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.346

7.  Measuring health-related quality of life in chronic headache: A comparative evaluation of the Chronic Headache Quality of Life Questionnaire and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6).

Authors:  Kirstie L Haywood; Felix Achana; Vivien Nichols; Gemma Pearce; Barbara Box; Lynne Muldoon; Shilpa Patel; Frances Griffiths; Kimberly Stewart; Martin Underwood; Manjit M Matharu
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.292

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.