Paul W C Wong1, Tim M H Li2, Melissa Chan3, Y W Law2, Michael Chau4, Cecilia Cheng5, K W Fu6, John Bacon-Shone7, Paul S F Yip8. 1. Department of Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong paulw@hku.hk. 2. Department of Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 3. Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 4. Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 6. Journalism and Media Studies Centre, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 7. Social Sciences Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 8. Department of Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Severe social withdrawal behaviors among young people have been a subject of public and clinical concerns. AIMS: This study aimed to explore the prevalence of social withdrawal behaviors among young people aged 12-29 years in Hong Kong. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone-based survey was conducted with 1,010 young individuals. Social withdrawal behaviors were measured with the proposed research diagnostic criteria for hikikomori and were categorized according to the (a) international proposed duration criterion (more than 6 months), (b) local proposed criterion (less than 6 months) and (c) with withdrawal behaviors but self-perceived as non-problematic. The correlates of social withdrawal among the three groups were examined using multinomial and ordinal logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of more than 6 months, less than 6 months and self-perceived non-problematic social withdrawal were 1.9%, 2.5% and 2.6%, respectively. In terms of the correlates, the internationally and locally defined socially withdrawn youths are similar, while the self-perceived non-problematic group is comparable to the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: The study finds that the prevalence of severe social withdrawal in Hong Kong is comparable to that in Japan. Both groups with withdrawal behaviors for more or less than 6 months share similar characteristics and are related to other contemporary youth issues, for example, compensated dating and self-injury behavior. The self-perceived non-problematic group appears to be a distinct group and the withdrawal behaviors of its members may be discretionary.
BACKGROUND: Severe social withdrawal behaviors among young people have been a subject of public and clinical concerns. AIMS: This study aimed to explore the prevalence of social withdrawal behaviors among young people aged 12-29 years in Hong Kong. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone-based survey was conducted with 1,010 young individuals. Social withdrawal behaviors were measured with the proposed research diagnostic criteria for hikikomori and were categorized according to the (a) international proposed duration criterion (more than 6 months), (b) local proposed criterion (less than 6 months) and (c) with withdrawal behaviors but self-perceived as non-problematic. The correlates of social withdrawal among the three groups were examined using multinomial and ordinal logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of more than 6 months, less than 6 months and self-perceived non-problematic social withdrawal were 1.9%, 2.5% and 2.6%, respectively. In terms of the correlates, the internationally and locally defined socially withdrawn youths are similar, while the self-perceived non-problematic group is comparable to the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: The study finds that the prevalence of severe social withdrawal in Hong Kong is comparable to that in Japan. Both groups with withdrawal behaviors for more or less than 6 months share similar characteristics and are related to other contemporary youth issues, for example, compensated dating and self-injury behavior. The self-perceived non-problematic group appears to be a distinct group and the withdrawal behaviors of its members may be discretionary.
Authors: John W M Yuen; Yoyo K Y Yan; Victor C W Wong; Wilson W S Tam; Ka-Wing So; Wai-Tong Chien Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: John W M Yuen; Victor C W Wong; Wilson W S Tam; Ka Wing So; Wai Tong Chien Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Melissa Chan; Tim M H Li; Yik Wa Law; Paul W C Wong; Michael Chau; Cecilia Cheng; King Wa Fu; John Bacon-Shone; Qijin Emily Cheng; Paul S F Yip Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 3.240