| Literature DB >> 29748164 |
Paul Wc Wong1, Lucia Lin Liu1, Tim Mh Li2, Alan R Teo3,4,5, Takahiro A Kato6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Socially withdrawn youth belong to an emerging subgroup of youth who are not in employment, education, or training and who have limited social interaction intention and opportunities. The use of the internet and social media is expected to be an alternative and feasible way to reach this group of young people because of their reclusive nature.Entities:
Keywords: China; Web survey; adolescent; hikikomori; social withdrawal; youth social issues
Year: 2018 PMID: 29748164 PMCID: PMC5968215 DOI: 10.2196/mental.8509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Ment Health ISSN: 2368-7959
Figure 1Effectiveness funnel of Weibo.
Survey administration procedure and distribution of responses.
| Media | Administration period | Additional remarks | Number of responses |
| Oct 19 to Oct 20, 2015 | Charged by per 1000 impressions; because none of these impressions were transferred into responses, the advertising strategy was changed to the interaction rate from Oct 20 onwards | 85 | |
| Oct 20, 2015, to May 20, 2016 | Charged by per click of the link | ||
| WeChat groups | Feb 2 to Feb 22, 2016 | During the period of Chinese New Year, the survey information was posted on several WeChat groups. | 43 |
| Wandianba website [ | Apr 1 to Apr 30, 2016 | The research team posted the survey information on several internet communication platforms that appeal to young people, including Mop, Hupu, Tianya, Baidu Tieba, and Wandianba. However, except for Wandianba, where the administrator approved the attempt to advertise the survey, other platforms immediately banned and deleted the messages posted | 9 |
Comparison of access to the survey categorical and continuous variables of the classified participants using Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, respectively.
| Online behaviors | Comparison group | Withdrawal group | Asocial group | |||||
| Phone, n (%) | 83 (76.9) | 10 (77) | >.99 | 4 (57) | .36 | 4 (44) | .047 | |
| Computer, n (%) | 25 (23.1) | 3 (23) | 3 (43) | 5 (56) | ||||
| Weibo, n (%) | 64 (59.2) | 10 (77) | .04 | 6 (86) | .42 | 5 (56) | .007 | |
| WeChat, n (%) | 40 (37.0) | 1 ( 8) | 1 (14) | 1 (11) | ||||
| Wandianba, n (%) | 4 ( 3.7) | 2 (15) | 0 ( 0) | 3 (33) | ||||
| Time spent on questionnaire (in seconds), mean (SD) | 757.80 (768.52) | 644.08 (165.58) | .91 | 870.00 (1031.51) | .29 | 835.33 (653.50) | .67 | |
| Weibo, mean (SD) | 94.60 (212.40) | 24.09 (55.07) | .02 | 7.60 (9.24) | .07 | 57.17 (119.46) | .37 | |
| WeChat, mean (SD) | 163.40 (313.38) | 57.36 (92.56) | .003 | 104.00 (42.78) | .97 | 27.33 (26.10) | .004 | |
| QQa, mean (SD) | 196.89 (173.86) | 155.55 (182.07) | .17 | 136.00 (72.32) | .62 | 127.29 (210.30) | .04 | |
| Frequency of contacting online friends, mean (SD) | 1.84 (1.19) | 1.77 (0.83) | .76 | 1.14 (0.38) | .13 | 2.56 (1.42) | .09 | |
aQQ: a widely used instant messaging software in China.
Comparison of sociodemographics categorical variables of the classified participants using Fisher exact test.
| Characteristics | Comparison group, n (%) | Withdrawal group, n (%) | Asocial group, n (%) | Hikikomori group, n (%) | ||||
| Male | 43 (39.8) | 5 (38) | >.99 | 2 (29) | .70 | 6 (67) | .16 | |
| Female | 65 (60.1) | 8 (62) | 5 (71) | 3 (33) | ||||
| <18 | 13 (12.3) | 6 (46) | .02 | 0 ( 0) | .47 | 1 (11) | >.99 | |
| 18-24 | 56 (52.8) | 5 (38) | 5 (83) | 5 (56) | ||||
| >24 | 37 (34.9) | 2 (15) | 1 (17) | 3 (33) | ||||
| Above secondary Form 3 | 91 (84.3) | 8 (62) | .06 | 7 (100) | .59 | 8 (89) | >.99 | |
| Form 3 or below | 17 (15.7) | 5 (38) | 0 (0) | 1 (11) | ||||
| Single | 82 (79.6) | 8 (67) | .29 | 6 (100) | .59 | 6 (67) | .40 | |
| Married/cohabitating | 21 (20.4) | 4 (33) | 0 (0) | 3 (33) | ||||
| Both parents | 95 (88.0) | 10 (77) | .38 | 6 (86) | >.99 | 8 (89) | >.99 | |
| Others | 13 (12.0) | 3 (23) | 1 (14) | 1 (11) | ||||
| Student | 40 (37.0) | 8 (62) | .01 | 3 (43) | >.99 | 3 (33) | .10 | |
| Employed | 64 (59.3) | 3 (23) | 4 (57) | 4 (44) | ||||
| Unemployed | 4 (3.7) | 2 (15) | 0 (0) | 2 (22) | ||||
| Yes | 3 (2.8) | 0 (0) | >.99 | 0 (0) | >.99 | 2 (22) | .047 | |
| No | 105 (97.2) | 13 (100) | 7 (100) | 7 (78) | ||||
Comparison of social capital continuous variables of the classified participants using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test.
| Social capital | Comparison group, mean (SD) | Withdrawal group, mean (SD) | Asocial group, mean (SD) | Hikikomori group, mean (SD) | |||
| Online bonding | 25.05 (6.10) | 24.69 (5.54) | .79 | 26.71 (6.90) | .70 | 28.56 (5.94) | .16 |
| Online bridging | 32.34 (7.81) | 36.85 (8.31) | .07 | 35.43 (9.69) | .13 | 36.33 (8.49) | .18 |
| Offline bonding | 35.57 (5.81) | 33.62 (6.41) | .12 | 37.43 (4.79) | .64 | 32.89 (5.62) | .20 |
| Offline bridging | 35.81 (7.08) | 36.15 (8.44) | .97 | 38.00 (6.95) | .43 | 30.56 (8.93) | .07 |