Literature DB >> 14748895

Adverse drug reaction teaching in UK undergraduate medical and pharmacy programmes.

A R Cox1, J F Marriott, K A Wilson, R E Ferner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of teaching about the Committee on Safety of Medicine's Yellow Card scheme and adverse drug reactions within UK Schools of Medicine and Pharmacy.
METHODS: A self-completed questionnaire sent to all heads of undergraduate schools of medicine and pharmacy within the UK.
RESULTS: The majority of undergraduate syllabi feature the Yellow Card Scheme. Knowledge of the Yellow Card Scheme was assessed in 79% of pharmacy programmes and 57% of medical schools. Specialist speakers on the Yellow Card Scheme were infrequently used. Fewer than half of respondents provided students with a guide to reporting ADRs (43% pharmacy and 43% medical). There is some disagreement about the value of supplying students with printed material about the Yellow Card Scheme. Half of medical Schools did not think that supplying 'Current Problems In Pharmacovigilance' would be useful.
CONCLUSIONS: It was found that in both medicine and pharmacy, courses differed substantially in teaching about the Yellow Card Scheme and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). There is scope for increased involvement of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in undergraduate education, in line with recommendations from the National Audit Office.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14748895     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2003.00533.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther        ISSN: 0269-4727            Impact factor:   2.512


  20 in total

1.  Communication of findings in pharmacovigilance: use of the term "signal" and the need for precision in its use.

Authors:  Manfred Hauben; Lester Reich
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Physicians' attitudes and adverse drug reaction reporting : a case-control study in Portugal.

Authors:  Maria T Herdeiro; Adolfo Figueiras; Jorge Polónia; Juan Jesus Gestal-Otero
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Influence of pharmacists' attitudes on adverse drug reaction reporting : a case-control study in Portugal.

Authors:  Maria T Herdeiro; Adolfo Figueiras; Jorge Polónia; J J Gestal-Otero
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Reporting of adverse drug reactions by general practitioners: a questionnaire-based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anneke Passier; Marije ten Napel; Kees van Grootheest; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Preaching to the converted - optimising adverse drug reaction reporting by dentists.

Authors:  M M Patel; D R Radford; D Brown
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Introducing pharmacovigilance to postgraduate pharmacy students in Nepal.

Authors:  Palaian Subish; Saval Khanal; Kadir Alam; Arjun Paudel
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  An educational intervention's effect on healthcare professionals' attitudes towards pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Nisha Jha; Devendra Singh Rathore; P Ravi Shankar; Sudesh Gyawali; Mohamed Alshakka; Shital Bhandary
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2014-12-31

8.  Adverse drug event reporting: awareness is not enough.

Authors:  Joyce A Generali
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-02

9.  Restoring confidence in vaccines by explaining vaccine safety monitoring: is a targeted approach needed?

Authors:  Rachel E Casiday; Anthony R Cox
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  The role of hidden curriculum in teaching pharmacy students about patient safety.

Authors:  Fay Bradley; Alison Steven; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.