Literature DB >> 25059889

Lagrangian postprocessing of computational hemodynamics.

Shawn C Shadden1, Amirhossein Arzani.   

Abstract

Recent advances in imaging, modeling, and computing have rapidly expanded our capabilities to model hemodynamics in the large vessels (heart, arteries, and veins). This data encodes a wealth of information that is often under-utilized. Modeling (and measuring) blood flow in the large vessels typically amounts to solving for the time-varying velocity field in a region of interest. Flow in the heart and larger arteries is often complex, and velocity field data provides a starting point for investigating the hemodynamics. This data can be used to perform Lagrangian particle tracking, and other Lagrangian-based postprocessing. As described herein, Lagrangian methods are necessary to understand inherently transient hemodynamic conditions from the fluid mechanics perspective, and to properly understand the biomechanical factors that lead to acute and gradual changes of vascular function and health. The goal of the present paper is to review Lagrangian methods that have been used in post-processing velocity data of cardiovascular flows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25059889      PMCID: PMC4289096          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1070-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  121 in total

1.  Path-dependent hemodynamics of the stenosed carotid bifurcation.

Authors:  Mauro Tambasco; David A Steinman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Computational analysis of an aortic valve jet with Lagrangian coherent structures.

Authors:  Shawn C Shadden; Matteo Astorino; Jean-Frédéric Gerbeau
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.642

3.  The hemodynamics of the Berlin pulsatile VAD and the role of its MHV configuration.

Authors:  Idit Avrahami; Moshe Rosenfeld; Shmuel Einav
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Targeted particle tracking in computational models of human carotid bifurcations.

Authors:  Ian Marshall
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Particle volumetric residence time calculations in arterial geometries.

Authors:  M J Kunov; D A Steinman; C R Ethier
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  A comparative study of helical-type and traditional-type artery bypass grafts: numerical simulation.

Authors:  Jun Wen; Tinghui Zheng; Wentao Jiang; Xiaoyan Deng; Yubo Fan
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  On the prediction of monocyte deposition in abdominal aortic aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  David Hardman; Barry J Doyle; Scott I K Semple; Jennifer M J Richards; David E Newby; William J Easson; Peter R Hoskins
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.617

8.  Hemodynamic changes quantified in abdominal aortic aneurysms with increasing exercise intensity using mr exercise imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Ga-Young Suh; Andrea S Les; Adam S Tenforde; Shawn C Shadden; Ryan L Spilker; Janice J Yeung; Christopher P Cheng; Robert J Herfkens; Ronald L Dalman; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Effect of continuous arterial blood flow in patients with rotary cardiac assist device on the washout of a stenosis wake in the carotid bifurcation: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Martin Prosi; Karl Perktold; Heinrich Schima
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Semi-automatic quantification of 4D left ventricular blood flow.

Authors:  Jonatan Eriksson; Carl Johan Carlhäll; Petter Dyverfeldt; Jan Engvall; Ann F Bolger; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  13 in total

1.  Mechanical platelet activation potential in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Kirk B Hansen; Amirhossein Arzani; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  A Distributed Lumped Parameter Model of Blood Flow.

Authors:  Mehran Mirramezani; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Quantification of near-wall hemodynamic risk factors in large-scale cerebral arterial trees.

Authors:  Mahsa Ghaffari; Ali Alaraj; Xinjian Du; Xiaohong Joe Zhou; Fady T Charbel; Andreas A Linninger
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Accounting for residence-time in blood rheology models: do we really need non-Newtonian blood flow modelling in large arteries?

Authors:  Amirhossein Arzani
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  A parallel fluid-solid coupling model using LAMMPS and Palabos based on the immersed boundary method.

Authors:  Jifu Tan; Talid Sinno; Scott L Diamond
Journal:  J Comput Sci       Date:  2018-02-14

6.  Hemodynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm characterized by in vitro 4D flow MRI.

Authors:  Omid Amili; Daniele Schiavazzi; Sean Moen; Bharathi Jagadeesan; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Filippo Coletti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of Intracranial Aneurysm Morphology and Rupture Status on the Particle Residence Time.

Authors:  E L Leemans; B M W Cornelissen; G Rosalini; D Verbaan; J J Schneiders; R van den Berg; W P Vandertop; E T van Bavel; C H Slump; C B L M Majoie; H A Marquering
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Platelet activation via dynamic conformational changes of von Willebrand factor under shear.

Authors:  Denis M Pushin; Tatiana Y Salikhova; Ksenia E Zlobina; Georgy Th Guria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Engineering Perspective on Cardiovascular Simulations of Fontan Hemodynamics: Where Do We Stand with a Look Towards Clinical Application.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 10.  4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement.

Authors:  Petter Dyverfeldt; Malenka Bissell; Alex J Barker; Ann F Bolger; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers; Christopher J Francios; Alex Frydrychowicz; Julia Geiger; Daniel Giese; Michael D Hope; Philip J Kilner; Sebastian Kozerke; Saul Myerson; Stefan Neubauer; Oliver Wieben; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.