Literature DB >> 25058503

Analysis of candidate genes for morphine preference quantitative trait locus Mop2.

G A Doyle1, C L Schwebel2, S E Ruiz2, A D Chou2, A T Lai2, M-J Wang2, G G Smith3, R J Buono4, W H Berrettini2, T N Ferraro5.   

Abstract

Compared to DBA/2J (D2), C57BL/6J (B6) inbred mice exhibit strong morphine preference when tested using a two-bottle choice drinking paradigm. A morphine preference quantitative trait locus (QTL), Mop2, was originally mapped to proximal chromosome (Chr) 10 using a B6xD2 F2 intercross population, confirmed with reciprocal congenic strains and fine mapped with recombinant congenic strains. These efforts identified a ∼ 10-Million base pair (Mbp) interval, underlying Mop2, containing 35 genes. To further reduce the interval, mice from the D2.B6-Mop2-P1 congenic strain were backcrossed to parental D2 mice and two new recombinant strains of interest were generated: D2.B6-Mop2-P1.pD.dB and D2.B6-Mop2-P1.pD.dD. Results obtained from testing these strains in the two-bottle choice drinking paradigm suggest that the gene(s) responsible for the Mop2 QTL is one or more of 22 remaining within the newly defined interval (∼ 7.6 Mbp) which includes Oprm1 and several other genes related to opioid pharmacology. Real-time qRT-PCR analysis of Oprm1 and opioid-related genes Rgs17, Ppp1r14c, Vip, and Iyd revealed both between-strain and within-strain expression differences in comparisons of saline- and morphine-treated B6 and D2 mice. Analysis of Rgs17 protein levels also revealed both between-strain and within-strain differences in comparisons of saline- and morphine-treated B6 and D2 mice. Results suggest that the Mop2 QTL represents the combined influence of multiple genetic variants on morphine preference in these two strains. Relative contributions of each variant remain to be determined.
Copyright © 2014 IBRO. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IYD; Ppp1r14c; Rgs17; Vip; two-bottle choice; μ-opioid receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25058503      PMCID: PMC4164601          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  49 in total

1.  Opiate receptor knockout mice define mu receptor roles in endogenous nociceptive responses and morphine-induced analgesia.

Authors:  I Sora; N Takahashi; M Funada; H Ujike; R S Revay; D M Donovan; L L Miner; G R Uhl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene.

Authors:  H W Matthes; R Maldonado; F Simonin; O Valverde; S Slowe; I Kitchen; K Befort; A Dierich; M Le Meur; P Dollé; E Tzavara; J Hanoune; B P Roques; B L Kieffer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effects of acute administration of ethanol and the mu-opiate agonist etonitazene on thyroid hormone metabolism in rat brain.

Authors:  A Baumgartner; G Pinna; L Hiedra; F Bauer; J Wolf; M Eravci; H Prengel; O Brödel; G Schmidt; H Meinhold
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Voluntary consumption of morphine in 15 inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J K Belknap; J C Crabbe; J Riggan; L A O'Toole
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Localization to chromosome 10 of a locus influencing morphine analgesia in crosses derived from C57BL/6 and DBA/2 strains.

Authors:  J K Belknap; J S Mogil; M L Helms; S P Richards; L A O'Toole; S E Bergeson; K J Buck
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.037

6.  Chromosomal localization of opioid peptide and receptor genes in the mouse.

Authors:  B Giros; M Pohl; J M Rochelle; M F Seldin
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  Genetic differences in the rewarding and activating effects of morphine and ethanol.

Authors:  C L Cunningham; D R Niehus; D H Malott; L K Prather
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Murine chromosomal location of the mu and kappa opioid receptor genes.

Authors:  C A Kozak; J Filie; M C Adamson; Y Chen; L Yu
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Quantitative trait loci mapping of three loci controlling morphine preference using inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  W H Berrettini; T N Ferraro; R C Alexander; A M Buchberg; W H Vogel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Altered hematopoiesis, behavior, and sexual function in mu opioid receptor-deficient mice.

Authors:  M Tian; H E Broxmeyer; Y Fan; Z Lai; S Zhang; S Aronica; S Cooper; R M Bigsby; R Steinmetz; S J Engle; A Mestek; J D Pollock; M N Lehman; H T Jansen; M Ying; P J Stambrook; J A Tischfield; L Yu
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1997-04-21       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  10 in total

1.  Differential genetic risk for methamphetamine intake confers differential sensitivity to the temperature-altering effects of other addictive drugs.

Authors:  John R K Mootz; Nicholas B Miner; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 2.  Regulator of G Protein Signaling 17 as a Negative Modulator of GPCR Signaling in Multiple Human Cancers.

Authors:  Michael P Hayes; David L Roman
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  The effect of quinine in two bottle choice procedures in C57BL6 mice: Opioid preference, somatic withdrawal, and pharmacokinetic outcomes.

Authors:  Travis W Grim; Scarlet Jinhong Park; Cullen L Schmid; Robert B Laprairie; Michael Cameron; Laura M Bohn
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Verification of a genetic locus for methamphetamine intake and the impact of morphine.

Authors:  Emily C Eastwood; Amy J Eshleman; Aaron Janowsky; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Analysis of morphine responses in mice reveals a QTL on Chromosome 7.

Authors:  Wim E Crusio; Esha Dhawan; Elissa J Chesler; Anna Delprato
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-09-02

6.  A Systems Approach Implicates a Brain Mitochondrial Oxidative Homeostasis Co-expression Network in Genetic Vulnerability to Alcohol Withdrawal.

Authors:  Nicole A R Walter; DeAunne L Denmark; Laura B Kozell; Kari J Buck
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Taar1 gene variants have a causal role in methamphetamine intake and response and interact with Oprm1.

Authors:  Alexandra M Stafford; Cheryl Reed; Harue Baba; Nicole Ar Walter; John Rk Mootz; Robert W Williams; Kim A Neve; Lev M Fedorov; Aaron J Janowsky; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Confirmation of a Causal Taar1 Allelic Variant in Addiction-Relevant Methamphetamine Behaviors.

Authors:  Tamara J Phillips; Tyler Roy; Sara J Aldrich; Harue Baba; Jason Erk; John R K Mootz; Cheryl Reed; Elissa J Chesler
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  A Novel Morphine Drinking Model of Opioid Dependence in Rats.

Authors:  Pablo Berríos-Cárcamo; Mauricio Quezada; Daniela Santapau; Paola Morales; Belén Olivares; Carolina Ponce; Alba Ávila; Cristian De Gregorio; Marcelo Ezquer; María Elena Quintanilla; Mario Herrera-Marschitz; Yedy Israel; Fernando Ezquer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  A polymorphism in the OPRM1 3'-untranslated region is associated with methadone efficacy in treating opioid dependence.

Authors:  R C Crist; G A Doyle; E C Nelson; L Degenhardt; N G Martin; G W Montgomery; A J Saxon; W Ling; W H Berrettini
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.550

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.