Literature DB >> 25056645

[Direct acoustic cochlear stimulation for therapy of severe to profound mixed hearing loss: Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant System].

T Lenarz1, B Schwab, H Maier, E Kludt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Implantable hearing aids have become a valid option for the therapy of various forms of hearing loss. The Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant System is the first vibratory implant available for patients with severe to profound mixed hearing loss (MHL). By directly coupling sound energy into the perilymph, a very high maximum power output (MPO) is achieved over a broad frequency range. Via a conventional stapedotomy, the vibratory energy of the electromagnetic actuator is transferred directly to the perilymph through the oval window. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This article describes the technical principle, basic surgical aspects and audiological outcomes of two clinical studies. Additional coupling procedures and extensions to the spectrum of indications are also discussed. Surgically, the two-component system can either be implanted via a purely transmastoid approach with posterior tympanotomy, or additionally via transmeatal access to the stapes footplate. Pre- and postoperative audiological results of patients wearing conventional hearing aids and with severe to profound MHL, who were implanted with the Codacs™ system at the Medical University Hannover, were compared.
RESULTS: Significant improvements over conventional hearing aids could be achieved with initial bone conduction thresholds between 44 and 63 dB HL (Ø 54 dB HL) and an air-bone gap between 19 and 51 dB HL (Ø 34 dB HL) in patients with MHL caused by advanced otosclerosis or tympanosclerosis and an intact posterior wall of the auditory canal. The mean functional gain was 50 ± 9 dB (0.5-4 kHz) and the monosyllabic word score was 85% at 65 dB presentation level compared to conventional hearingaids with 25%. Speech intelligibility in noise (S0N0) improved by 7.1 to Ø 0.3 dB SNR with Codacs™. The mean bone conduction threshold remained unchanged or showed a minimal increase in the low-frequency range.
CONCLUSION: The CODACS system provides an effective new treatment for patients with severe to profound MHL for the first time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25056645     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-014-2893-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  5 in total

1.  The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator.

Authors:  Hannes Maier; Rolf Salcher; Burkard Schwab; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Nicolas Verhaert; Christian Desloovere; Jolien Desmet; Christiane D'hondt; Juan Carlos Falcón González; Eugen Kludt; Angel Ramos Macías; Henryk Skarżyński; Paul Van de Heyning; Caroline Vyncke; Arkadiusz Wasowski
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  First clinical experiences with a direct acoustic cochlear stimulator in comparison to preoperative fitted conventional hearing aids.

Authors:  Susan Busch; Stefanie Kruck; Dirk Spickers; Rudolf Leuwer; Sebastian Hoth; Mark Praetorius; Peter K Plinkert; Hamidreza Mojallal; Burkard Schwab; Hannes Maier; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Multicenter study with a direct acoustic cochlear implant.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Joost W Zwartenkot; Christof Stieger; Burkard Schwab; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis; Ad F M Snik; Christiane D'hondt; Hamidreza Mojallal
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.

Authors:  Rudolf Häusler; Christof Stieger; Hans Bernhard; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 1.854

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Implantable hearing devices.

Authors:  Matthias Tisch
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.