Literature DB >> 8483408

The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-state quality factors.

D G Fryback1, E J Dasbach, R Klein, B E Klein, N Dorn, K Peterson, P A Martin.   

Abstract

The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study (BDHOS) is an ongoing longitudinal cohort study of health status and health-related quality of life for a random sample of adults (age range at interview was 45 to 89 years; mean = 64.1, SD = 10.8) in a community population. In a face-to-face interview lasting approximately an hour, each participant responds to several batteries of questions. Included are a history of chronic medical conditions, current medications, and past surgeries; the SF-36 (a general health-status questionnaire); the Quality of Well-being index; self-rated health status on a five-point scale from "excellent" to "poor"; and evaluation of current health using the method of time tradeoffs. The authors present results from 1,356 interviews on these four principal measures, reporting mean scores by sex, by age, and for persons reporting being affected by various medical conditions. They believe data from the BDHOS will provide researchers and policy makers a reference collection of vital statistics for health-related quality of life. Additionally, the data provide a way to compare results from studies that utilize different indices from among the four principal measures of the BDHOS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8483408     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  193 in total

1.  Prevalence of self-rated visual impairment among adults with diabetes.

Authors:  J B Saaddine; K M Narayan; M M Engelgau; R E Aubert; R Klein; G L Beckles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  What is heartburn worth? A cost-utility analysis of management strategies.

Authors:  G R Heudebert; R M Centor; J C Klapow; R Marks; L Johnson; C M Wilcox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Methodological hurdles in conducting pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Authors:  J D Rizzo; N R Powe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques.

Authors:  C Green; J Brazier; M Deverill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Towards a blood test for heart failure: the potential use of circulating natriuretic peptides.

Authors:  S Talwar; P F Downie; L L Ng; I B Squire
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D.

Authors:  K Burström; M Johannesson; F Diderichsen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II.

Authors:  G Samsa; D Edelman; M L Rothman; G R Williams; J Lipscomb; D Matchar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Evaluating the benefits of increasing measles immunization rates.

Authors:  J Zwanziger; P G Szilagyi; P Kaul
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Aggregate Health Status: a benchmark index for community health.

Authors:  James F Reed; James N Burdine; Michael Felix
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Quality of life assessment software for computer-inexperienced older adults: multimedia utility elicitation for activities of daily living.

Authors:  M K Goldstein; D E Miller; S Davies; A M Garber
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.