| Literature DB >> 25050034 |
Makoto Kondo1, Yoshiaki Hirano2, Kazumi Kita3, Anuraga Jayanegara4, Hiro-Omi Yokota5.
Abstract
Green and black tea by-products, obtained from ready-made tea industry, were ensiled at 10°C, 20°C, and 30°C. Green tea by-product silage (GTS) and black tea by-product silage (BTS) were opened at 5, 10, 45 days after ensiling. Fermentation characteristics and nutrient composition, including tannins, were monitored and the silages on day 45 were subjected to in vitro ruminal fermentation to assess anti-nutritive effects of tannins using polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a tannin-binding agent. Results showed that the GTS and BTS silages were stable and fermented slightly when ensiled at 10°C. The GTS stored at 20°C and 30°C showed rapid pH decline and high acetic acid concentration. The BTS was fermented gradually with moderate change of pH and acid concentration. Acetic acid was the main acid product of fermentation in both GTS and BTS. The contents of total extractable phenolics and total extractable tannins in both silages were unaffected by storage temperatures, but condensed tannins in GTS were less when stored at high temperature. The GTS showed no PEG response on in vitro gas production, and revealed only a small increase by PEG on NH3-N concentration. Storage temperature of GTS did not affect the extent of PEG response to both gas production and NH3-N concentration. On the other hand, addition of PEG on BTS markedly increased both the gas production and NH3-N concentration at any ensiled temperature. It can be concluded that tannins in both GTS and BTS suppressed rumen fermentation, and tannins in GTS did more weakly than that in BTS. Ensiling temperature for both tea by-products did not affect the tannin's activity in the rumen.Entities:
Keywords: In vitro Ruminal Degradation; Silage Fermentation; Tannin; Tea By-product
Year: 2014 PMID: 25050034 PMCID: PMC4093564 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Chemical characteristics and lactic acid bacteria of green and black tea by-product before ensiling
| Attributes | Green tea by-product | Black tea by-product |
|---|---|---|
| Dry matter (DM, g/kg) | 196 ±0.9 | 183 ±1.1 |
| Water soluble carbohydrate (g/kg DM) | 10 ±0.2 | 11 ±0.4 |
| Buffering capacity (meq/kg DM) | 206 ±2.3 | 186 ±2.2 |
| Lactic acid bacteria (log10 cfu/g FM) | 6.28 ±0.08 | 6.28 ±0.12 |
| CP (g/kg DM) | 292 ±1.9 | 290 ±1.3 |
| NDICP (g/kg CP) | 165 ±6.4 | 519 ±6.0 |
| ADICP (g/kg CP) | 70 ±2.1 | 99 ±2.0 |
| NDF (g/kg DM) | 386 ±6.0 | 466 ±9.0 |
| ADF (g/kg DM) | 289 ±4.2 | 277 ±5.1 |
| ADL (g/kg DM) | 96 ±0.9 | 93 ±1.3 |
| Hemicellulose (g/kg DM) | 97 ±3.4 | 189 ±7.3 |
| Cellulose (g/kg DM) | 193 ±4.9 | 184 ±3.5 |
| TEPH (g/kg DM) | 81 ±2.1 | 94 ±0.9 |
| TET (g/kg DM) | 74 ±2.5 | 70 ±1.2 |
| CT (g/kg DM) | 21 ±0.4 | 11 ±0.4 |
cfu, colony forming unit; FM, fresh matter; CP, crude protein; NDICP, neutral detergent insoluble CP; ADICP, acid detergent insoluble CP; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ADL, acid detergent lignin; TEPH, total extractable phenolics; TET, total extractable tannins; CT, condensed tannins.
Figure 1Changes in pH, numbers of lactic acid bacteria, fermented products, and DM loss of green tea by-product silage ensiled at 10°C (○), 20°C (■) and 30°C (▲). Data were collected on 0, 5, 10, and 45 days after ensiling. Points indicate mean values of triplicates silos with standard errors represented by vertical bars.
Figure 2Changes in pH, numbers of lactic acid bacteria, fermented products, and DM loss of black tea by-product silage ensiled at 10°C (○), 20°C (■) and 30°C (▲). Data were collected on 0, 5, 10, and 45 days after ensiling. Points indicate mean values of triplicates silos with standard errors represented by vertical bars.
Chemical composition of green and black tea by-product silage on 45 days after ensiling at different temperatures
| Attributes | 10°C | 20°C | 30°C | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green tea by-product silage | ||||
| CP (g/kg DM) | 307 | 316 | 292 | 5.6 |
| NDICP (g/kg CP) | 121b | 115b | 135a | 2.8 |
| ADICP (g/kg CP) | 57b | 66a | 68a | 1.8 |
| NDF (g/kg DM) | 358 | 351 | 368 | 6.7 |
| ADF (g/kg DM) | 277 | 296 | 303 | 6.9 |
| ADL (g/kg DM) | 91b | 101a | 104a | 1.8 |
| Hemicellulose (g/kg DM) | 81a | 55c | 65b | 2.2 |
| Cellulose (g/kg DM) | 187 | 196 | 198 | 5.1 |
| TEPH (g/kg DM) | 87 | 98 | 92 | 4.3 |
| TET (g/kg DM) | 71 | 77 | 73 | 4.0 |
| CT (g/kg DM) | 35a | 9b | 11b | 1.3 |
| Black tea by-product silage | ||||
| CP (g/kg DM) | 287c | 306b | 313a | 1.3 |
| NDICP (g/kg CP) | 539 | 529 | 554 | 6.7 |
| ADICP (g/kg CP) | 102a | 87b | 78c | 2.0 |
| NDF (g/kg DM) | 479b | 493b | 520a | 7.3 |
| ADF (g/kg DM) | 246 | 250 | 255 | 4.9 |
| ADL (g/kg DM) | 83 | 86 | 84 | 5.0 |
| Hemicellulose (g/kg DM) | 234 | 243 | 265 | 8.2 |
| Cellulose (g/kg DM) | 163 | 163 | 171 | 3.8 |
| TEPH (g/kg DM) | 95 | 94 | 91 | 2.2 |
| TET (g/kg DM) | 69 | 70 | 64 | 2.2 |
| CT (g/kg DM) | 12a | 10b | 12a | 0.4 |
SEM, standard error of the mean; CP, crude protein; NDICP, neutral detergent insoluble CP; ADICP, acid detergent insoluble CP; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ADL, acid detergent lignin; TEPH, total extractable phenolics; TET, total extractable tannins; CT, condensed tannins.
Means with the different letter (a–c) in a row are significantly different (p<0.05).
Figure 3Changes in total extractable phenolics (TEPH), total extractable tannins (TET) and condensed tannins (CT) of green (above) and black (below) tea by-product silage stored at 10°C (○), 20°C (■) and 30°C (▲). Data were collected on 0, 5, 10, and 45 days after ensiling. Points indicate mean values of triplicates silos with standard errors represented by vertical bars.
Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment on in vitro gas production and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) from green and black tea by-product silage at 24 h after incubation
| Attributes | Day 0 | Day 45 | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 10°C | 20°C | 30°C | |||
| Gas production (mL/500 mg DM) | |||||
| Green tea by-product silage | |||||
| No PEG | 83.9 | 76.4a | 68.2b | 63.8b | 1.9 |
| With PEG | 85.3 | 77.3a | 69.7b | 64.0c | 1.2 |
| Increase (%) | 1.7 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Black tea by-product silage | |||||
| No PEG | 58.4 | 54.8a | 47.7b | 43.9c | 0.6 |
| With PEG | 65.2 | 61.2a, | 52.8b, | 48.5c, | 0.3 |
| Increase (%) | 11.7 | 11.6 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 1.9 |
| NH3-N (mg/40 mL/500 mg DM) | |||||
| Green tea by-product silage | |||||
| No PEG | 6.3 | 7.0b | 8.2a | 8.1a | 0.4 |
| With PEG | 9.0 | 10.0b, | 11.7a, | 11.1ab, | 0.9 |
| Increase (%) | 43.3 | 42.2 | 43.6 | 38.0 | 3.5 |
| Black tea by-product silage | |||||
| No PEG | 5.3 | 4.6b | 5.5a | 5.7a | 0.4 |
| With PEG | 8.3 | 8.3b, | 9.2a, | 8.6ab, | 0.2 |
| Increase (%) | 56.7 | 82.2a | 65.8b | 51.8c | 3.4 |
SEM, standard error of the mean; DM, dry matter.
Means with the different letter (a–c) in a row are significantly different (p<0.05).
Significantly different between No PEG (p<0.05).