Teresa Quattrin1, James N Roemmich2, Rocco Paluch3, Jihnhee Yu4, Leonard H Epstein3, Michelle A Ecker3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Women and Children's Hospital, Buffalo, New York; tquattrin@upa.chob.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Women and Children's Hospital, Buffalo, New York;USDA/ARS Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, North Dakota; and. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Women and Children's Hospital, Buffalo, New York; 4. Department of Biostatistics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test in the primary care setting the short- and long-term efficacy of a behavioral intervention that simultaneously targeted an overweight child and parent versus an information control (IC) targeting weight control only in the child. METHODS:Two- to 5-year-old children who had BMI≥85th percentile and an overweight parent (BMI >25 kg/m2) were randomized to Intervention or IC, both receiving diet and activity education over 12 months (13 sessions) followed by 12-month follow-up (3 sessions). Parents in the Intervention group were also targeted for weight control and received behavioral intervention. Pediatricians in 4 practices enrolled their patients with the assistance of embedded recruiters (Practice Enhancement Assistants) who assisted with treatment too. RESULTS:A total of 96 of the 105 children randomized (Intervention n = 46; IC n = 50) started the program and had data at baseline. Children in the Intervention experienced greater reductions in percent over BMI (group × months; P = .002) and z-BMI (group × months; P < 0.001) compared with IC throughout treatment and follow-up. Greater BMI reduction was observed over time for parents in the Intervention compared with IC (P < .001) throughout treatment and follow-up. Child weight changes were correlated with parent weight changes at 12 and 24 months (r = 0.38 and 0.26; P < .001 and P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrently targeting preschool-aged overweight and obese youth and their parents in primary care withbehavioral intervention results in greater decreases in child percent over BMI, z-BMI, and parent BMI compared with IC. The difference between Intervention and IC persists after 12 months of follow-up.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To test in the primary care setting the short- and long-term efficacy of a behavioral intervention that simultaneously targeted an overweight child and parent versus an information control (IC) targeting weight control only in the child. METHODS: Two- to 5-year-old children who had BMI ≥85th percentile and an overweight parent (BMI >25 kg/m2) were randomized to Intervention or IC, both receiving diet and activity education over 12 months (13 sessions) followed by 12-month follow-up (3 sessions). Parents in the Intervention group were also targeted for weight control and received behavioral intervention. Pediatricians in 4 practices enrolled their patients with the assistance of embedded recruiters (Practice Enhancement Assistants) who assisted with treatment too. RESULTS: A total of 96 of the 105 children randomized (Intervention n = 46; IC n = 50) started the program and had data at baseline. Children in the Intervention experienced greater reductions in percent over BMI (group × months; P = .002) and z-BMI (group × months; P < 0.001) compared with IC throughout treatment and follow-up. Greater BMI reduction was observed over time for parents in the Intervention compared with IC (P < .001) throughout treatment and follow-up. Child weight changes were correlated with parent weight changes at 12 and 24 months (r = 0.38 and 0.26; P < .001 and P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrently targeting preschool-aged overweight and obese youth and their parents in primary care with behavioral intervention results in greater decreases in child percent over BMI, z-BMI, and parent BMI compared with IC. The difference between Intervention and IC persists after 12 months of follow-up.
Authors: Denise E Wilfley; Tiffany L Tibbs; Dorothy J Van Buren; Kelle P Reach; Mark S Walker; Leonard H Epstein Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Elsie M Taveras; Katherine H Hohman; Sarah N Price; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Kathleen Mitchell; Steven L Gortmaker; Matthew W Gillman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Laura P Svetkey; Victor J Stevens; Phillip J Brantley; Lawrence J Appel; Jack F Hollis; Catherine M Loria; William M Vollmer; Christina M Gullion; Kristine Funk; Patti Smith; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Valerie Myers; Lillian F Lien; Daniel Laferriere; Betty Kennedy; Gerald J Jerome; Fran Heinith; David W Harsha; Pamela Evans; Thomas P Erlinger; Arline T Dalcin; Janelle Coughlin; Jeanne Charleston; Catherine M Champagne; Alan Bauck; Jamy D Ard; Kathleen Aicher Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Keely R Hawkins; John W Apolzan; Amanda E Staiano; Jenelle R Shanley; Corby K Martin Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Teresa Quattrin; Ying Cao; Rocco A Paluch; James N Roemmich; Michelle A Ecker; Leonard H Epstein Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kerri N Boutelle; Abby Braden; Jennifer M Douglas; Kyung E Rhee; David Strong; Cheryl L Rock; Denise E Wilfley; Leonard Epstein; Scott Crow Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Larry V Hedges; Chris Cyr; Deborah Young-Hyman; Laura Kettel Khan; Mackenzie Magnus; Heather King; Sonia Arteaga; John Cawley; Christina D Economos; Debra Haire-Joshu; Christine M Hunter; Bruce Y Lee; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Lorrene D Ritchie; Thomas N Robinson; Marlene B Schwartz Journal: Child Obes Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Elizabeth K Towner; Lisa M Clifford; Mary Beth McCullough; Cathleen Odar Stough; Lori J Stark Journal: Pediatr Clin North Am Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.278
Authors: Jess Haines; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Deborah Gross; Julia McDonald; Ken Kleinman; Matthew W Gillman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 5.002