Literature DB >> 25048979

Negative predictive value of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: outcome of 5-year follow-up in men with negative findings on initial MRI studies.

R Itatani1, T Namimoto2, S Atsuji3, K Katahira3, S Morishita3, K Kitani4, Y Hamada4, M Kitaoka5, T Nakaura6, Y Yamashita2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical negative predictive value (NPV) of multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) for prostate cancer in a 5-year follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-three men suspected of harboring prostate cancer with negative MRI findings were included. Patients with positive transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy findings were defined as false-negative. Patients with negative initial TRUS-guided biopsy findings were followed up and only patients with negative findings by digital rectal examination, MRI, and repeat biopsy and no increase in PSA at 5-year follow-up were defined as "clinically negative". The clinical NPV of mp-MRI was calculated. For quantitative analysis, mean signal intensity on T2-weighted images and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient value on ADC maps of the initial MRI studies were compared between peripheral-zone (PZ) cancer and the normal PZ based on pathologic maps of patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy.
RESULTS: The clinical NPV of mp-MRI was 89.6% for significant prostate cancer. Small cancers, prostatitis, and benign prostatic hypertrophy masking prostate cancer returned false-negative results. Quantitative analysis showed that there was no significant difference between PZ cancer and the normal PZ.
CONCLUSION: The mp-MRI revealed a high clinical NPV and is a useful tool to rule out clinically significant prostate cancer before biopsy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI); Negative predictive value; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25048979     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  34 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Imaging in Prostate and Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Laura M Douglass; Victoria Chernyak; Kara L Watts
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Endorectal multiparametric 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging associated with systematic cognitive biopsies does not increase prostate cancer detection rate: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Giorgio Bozzini; Fabio Grizzi; Mauro Seveso; Alberto Mandressi; Luca Balzarini; Federica Mrakic; Pietro Bono; Oliviero De Franceco; NicolòMaria Buffi; Giovanni Lughezzani; Massimo Lazzeri; Paolo Casale; Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Ruling out clinically significant prostate cancer with negative multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  Julie Y An; Abhinav Sidana; Sarah A Holzman; Joseph A Baiocco; Sherif Mehralivand; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Jelle Barentsz; Geert Villeirs; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Daniel J Margolis; Baris Turkbey; Harriet C Thoeny; François Cornud; Masoom A Haider; Katarzyna J Macura; Clare M Tempany; Sadhna Verma; Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  In-Bore MRI-guided Prostate Biopsies in Patients with Prior Positive Transrectal US-guided Biopsy Results: Pathologic Outcomes and Predictors of Missed Cancers.

Authors:  Kareem K Elfatairy; Christopher P Filson; Martin G Sanda; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Sherif G Nour
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-09-25

6.  What kind of prostate cancers do we miss on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Pieter Julien Luc De Visschere; Leslie Naesens; Louis Libbrecht; Charles Van Praet; Nicolaas Lumen; Valérie Fonteyne; Eva Pattyn; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Current role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Romaric Loffroy; Olivier Chevallier; Morgan Moulin; Sylvain Favelier; Pierre-Yves Genson; Pierre Pottecher; Gilles Crehange; Alexandre Cochet; Luc Cormier
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

8.  Relationship between non-suspicious MRI and insignificant prostate cancer: results from a monocentric study.

Authors:  Raphaële Renard-Penna; Morgan Roupret; Eva Compérat; François Rozet; Benjamin Granger; Johann Barkatz; Marc Olivier Bitker; Olivier Lucidarme; Olivier Cussenot; Pierre Mozer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies.

Authors:  Christopher P Filson; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J A Margolis; Jiaoti Huang; Patricia Lieu; Frederick J Dorey; Robert E Reiter; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Anna M Brown; Sandeep Sankineni; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.