David Johannes Scholz1, Martin A Janich2, Ulrich Köllisch1, Rolf F Schulte2, Jan H Ardenkjaer-Larsen3,4,5, Annette Frank6, Axel Haase1, Markus Schwaiger6, Marion I Menzel2. 1. Technische Universität München, Institute of Medical Engineering, Munich, Germany. 2. GE Global Research, Munich, Germany. 3. Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark. 4. Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark. 5. GE Healthcare, Broendby, Denmark. 6. Nuklearmedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Because pH plays a crucial role in several diseases, it is desirable to measure pH in vivo noninvasively and in a spatially localized manner. Spatial maps of pH were quantified in vitro, with a focus on method-based errors, and applied in vivo. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo (13) C mapping were performed for various flip angles for bicarbonate (BiC) and CO2 with spectral-spatial excitation and spiral readout in healthy Lewis rats in five slices. Acute subcutaneous sterile inflammation was induced with Concanavalin A in the right leg of Buffalo rats. pH and proton images were measured 2 h after induction. RESULTS: After optimizing the signal to noise ratio of the hyperpolarized (13) C-bicarbonate, error estimation of the spectral-spatial excited spectrum reveals that the method covers the biologically relevant pH range of 6 to 8 with low pH error (< 0.2). Quantification of pH maps shows negligible impact of the residual bicarbonate signal. pH maps reflect the induction of acute metabolic alkalosis. Inflamed, infected regions exhibit lower pH. CONCLUSION: Hyperpolarized (13) C-bicarbonate pH mapping was shown to be sensitive in the biologically relevant pH range. The mapping of pH was applied to healthy in vivo organs and interpreted within inflammation and acute metabolic alkalosis models.
PURPOSE: Because pH plays a crucial role in several diseases, it is desirable to measure pH in vivo noninvasively and in a spatially localized manner. Spatial maps of pH were quantified in vitro, with a focus on method-based errors, and applied in vivo. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo (13) C mapping were performed for various flip angles for bicarbonate (BiC) and CO2 with spectral-spatial excitation and spiral readout in healthy Lewis rats in five slices. Acute subcutaneous sterile inflammation was induced with Concanavalin A in the right leg of Buffalo rats. pH and proton images were measured 2 h after induction. RESULTS: After optimizing the signal to noise ratio of the hyperpolarized (13) C-bicarbonate, error estimation of the spectral-spatial excited spectrum reveals that the method covers the biologically relevant pH range of 6 to 8 with low pH error (< 0.2). Quantification of pH maps shows negligible impact of the residual bicarbonate signal. pH maps reflect the induction of acute metabolic alkalosis. Inflamed, infected regions exhibit lower pH. CONCLUSION: Hyperpolarized (13) C-bicarbonate pH mapping was shown to be sensitive in the biologically relevant pH range. The mapping of pH was applied to healthy in vivo organs and interpreted within inflammation and acute metabolic alkalosis models.
Authors: Eugen Kubala; Kim A Muñoz-Álvarez; Geoffrey Topping; Christian Hundshammer; Benedikt Feuerecker; Pedro A Gómez; Giorgio Pariani; Franz Schilling; Steffen J Glaser; Rolf F Schulte; Marion I Menzel; Markus Schwaiger Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2016-12-30 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: David E Korenchan; Jeremy W Gordon; Sukumar Subramaniam; Renuka Sriram; Celine Baligand; Mark VanCriekinge; Robert Bok; Daniel B Vigneron; David M Wilson; Peder E Z Larson; John Kurhanewicz; Robert R Flavell Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zhen J Wang; Michael A Ohliger; Peder E Z Larson; Jeremy W Gordon; Robert A Bok; James Slater; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Christopher P Hess; John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: D E Korenchan; R R Flavell; C Baligand; R Sriram; K Neumann; S Sukumar; H VanBrocklin; D B Vigneron; D M Wilson; J Kurhanewicz Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: David Johannes Scholz; Angela M Otto; Josef Hintermair; Franz Schilling; Annette Frank; Ulrich Köllisch; Martin A Janich; Rolf F Schulte; Markus Schwaiger; Axel Haase; Marion I Menzel Journal: MAGMA Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Nicholas Drachman; Stephen Kadlecek; Mehrdad Pourfathi; Yi Xin; Harilla Profka; Rahim Rizi Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tuula Peñate Medina; Jan Philip Kolb; Gereon Hüttmann; Robert Huber; Oula Peñate Medina; Linh Ha; Patricia Ulloa; Naomi Larsen; Arianna Ferrari; Magdalena Rafecas; Mark Ellrichmann; Mariya S Pravdivtseva; Mariia Anikeeva; Jana Humbert; Marcus Both; Jennifer E Hundt; Jan-Bernd Hövener Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 7.561