Literature DB >> 35283082

Preliminary side effect profile, safety, and tolerability of hormonal contraception among women receiving opioid-agonist therapy.

Heidi S Melbostad1, Deborah S Wachtel2, Kerstin A Lipke1, Gary J Badger3, Alexis K Matusiewicz1, Catalina N Rey1, Lauren K MacAfee4, Anne K Dougherty4, Sarah H Heil5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): To characterize for the first time the side effect profile, safety, and tolerability of hormonal contraception among women receiving opioid-agonist therapy. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected from participants in a three-arm randomized controlled trial (N = 138) aimed at increasing effective contraceptive use among women receiving opioid-agonist therapy. Participants in the 2 intervention conditions (n = 90) had free access to hormonal contraception at each of the 14 visits scheduled during the 6-month intervention. Contraceptive use and side effects were recorded at each visit; participants could change methods or discontinue use at any time. Verbatim side effects were classified using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology.
RESULTS: Of 67 participants reporting hormonal contraceptive use, 29 (43%) initiated implants, 14 (21%) intrauterine devices, 13 (19%) combined pills, 11 (16%) progestin-only pills, 10 (15%) injectables, 1 (2%) ring, and 1 (2%) patch; the average (±standard deviation) duration of use was 129 ± 55, 129 ± 60, 108 ± 62, 102 ± 61, 111 ± 31, 145, and 18 days, respectively. A total of 321 side effects were reported by 55 (82%) participants. Fifty (75%) participants reported menstrual cycle changes/uterine bleeding, followed by headaches (16, 24%), weight gain (15, 22%), and abdominal pain or nausea/vomiting (11, 16%). No serious side effects were reported. Twelve participants (18%) changed methods and 13 (19%) discontinued all hormonal contraceptive use. CONCLUSION(S): The hormonal contraceptive side effects reported by this small group of women receiving opioid-agonist therapy appear consistent with those reported by the general population, was generally well-tolerated, and did not raise safety concerns. IMPLICATIONS: These results provide important preliminary evidence that hormonal contraceptive use produces a familiar side effect profile and is well-tolerated by women receiving opioid-agonist therapy, although studies with larger samples followed over longer periods of time with appropriate comparison conditions are needed to fully assess tolerability and safety.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hormonal contraception; Hormonal contraceptive use; Opioid use disorder; Opioid-agonist therapy; Safety; Side effects; Tolerability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35283082      PMCID: PMC9317667          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.051


  20 in total

1.  [Weight gain among the patients in methadone maintenance program as come-back to population norm].

Authors:  L Okruhlica; S Slezáková
Journal:  Cas Lek Cesk       Date:  2008

2.  [Nutritional status of drug addicts in a methadone program].

Authors:  J Kábrt; H Wilczek; J Svobodová; M Haluzík; E Kotrlíková
Journal:  Cas Lek Cesk       Date:  1999-11-15

3.  Safety and effectiveness of hormonal contraception for women who use opioids: A systematic review.

Authors:  Angeline Ti; Rebecca H Stone; Maura Whiteman; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  The ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.702

5.  Increases in body mass index following initiation of methadone treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer M Fenn; Jennifer S Laurent; Stacey C Sigmon
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-11-05

6.  Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Jenifer E Allsworth; Emiko Petrosky; Tessa Madden; David Eisenberg; Gina Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Menstrual cycle length during methadone maintenance.

Authors:  John Schmittner; Jennifer R Schroeder; David H Epstein; Kenzie L Preston
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Kira Levy; Allison Kelley; Kevin Grumbach; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Reliability of the timeline follow-back sexual behavior interview.

Authors:  L S Weinhardt; M P Carey; S A Maisto; K B Carey; M M Cohen; S M Wickramasinghe
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1998

Review 10.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.