PURPOSE: To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b-values up to 2000 s/mm(2) , in terms of fitting quality and repeatability. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b-values, respectively. The highest b-value was 2000 s/mm(2) . The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F-ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1). RESULTS: The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values. CONCLUSION: Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b-values up to 2000 s/mm(2) .
PURPOSE: To evaluate monoexponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and biexponential models for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of normal prostate and prostate cancer (PCa), using b-values up to 2000 s/mm(2) , in terms of fitting quality and repeatability. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers and 16 PCa patients underwent a total of four repeated 3T DWI examinations using 16 and 12 b-values, respectively. The highest b-value was 2000 s/mm(2) . The normalized mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in normal tissue and PCa using anatomical images and prostatectomy sections, were fitted using the four models. The fitting quality was evaluated using Akaike information criteria and F-ratio. Repeatability of the fitted parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1). RESULTS: The biexponential model provided the best fit to normal prostate and PCa DWI data. The parameters of the monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models had higher ICC(3,1) values compared with the biexponential model. The kurtosis model provided a better fit to DWI data of normal prostate and PCa than the monoexponential model, whereas these models had comparable reliability and repeatability based on ICC(3,1) values. CONCLUSION: Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis model seems to be the preferred model for characterization of normal prostate and PCa DWI using b-values up to 2000 s/mm(2) .
Authors: Fredrik Langkilde; Thiele Kobus; Andriy Fedorov; Ruth Dunne; Clare Tempany; Robert V Mulkern; Stephan E Maier Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Oscar Jalnefjord; Mats Andersson; Mikael Montelius; Göran Starck; Anna-Karin Elf; Viktor Johanson; Johanna Svensson; Maria Ljungberg Journal: MAGMA Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Ivan Jambor; Anna Kuisma; Esa Kähkönen; Jukka Kemppainen; Harri Merisaari; Olli Eskola; Jarmo Teuho; Ileana Montoya Perez; Marko Pesola; Hannu J Aronen; Peter J Boström; Pekka Taimen; Heikki Minn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jussi Toivonen; Ileana Montoya Perez; Parisa Movahedi; Harri Merisaari; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Jonne Pohjankukka; Aida Kiviniemi; Tapio Pahikkala; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ileana Montoya Perez; Antti Airola; Peter J Boström; Ivan Jambor; Tapio Pahikkala Journal: Stat Methods Med Res Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Likun Cao; Jie Chen; Ting Duan; Min Wang; Hanyu Jiang; Yi Wei; Chunchao Xia; Xiaoyue Zhou; Xu Yan; Bin Song Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2019-04