Lindsey Turner1, Frank J Chaloupka. 1. 1 Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, IL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Updated standards for meals sold through the USDA's National School Lunch Program took effect at the beginning of the 2012-2013 school year. The current study assessed the perceptions of school staff regarding student reactions to these changes in school lunches and how perceptions varied across schools. METHODS: Mailback surveys were gathered from administrators and food service staff at a nationally representative sample of 557 US public elementary schools in the second half of the 2012-2013 school year. RESULTS: Half of the respondents (56.4%) agreed that students complained about the meals at first, but 70% agreed that students like the new lunches. Perceived student complaints were significantly higher among respondents from rural schools (n=184) than from urban (n=127) or suburban (n=171) schools. Respondents at rural schools also were more likely to report that they perceived that fewer students were purchasing the meals and that students were consuming less of the meals than during the previous year. Perceived student complaints were higher at schools not offering regular (i.e., higher-fat) pizza. Respondents at socioeconomically disadvantaged schools (>66% of students eligible for free/reduced-priced meals) perceived that more students were buying lunch and that students were eating more of the meal than in the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of school personnel suggest reasonable acceptance of school lunches subsequent to revisions. Given the importance of offering healthful foods at school, the revised USDA meals standards are a promising strategy to improve the diets of children.
BACKGROUND: Updated standards for meals sold through the USDA's National School Lunch Program took effect at the beginning of the 2012-2013 school year. The current study assessed the perceptions of school staff regarding student reactions to these changes in school lunches and how perceptions varied across schools. METHODS: Mailback surveys were gathered from administrators and food service staff at a nationally representative sample of 557 US public elementary schools in the second half of the 2012-2013 school year. RESULTS: Half of the respondents (56.4%) agreed that students complained about the meals at first, but 70% agreed that students like the new lunches. Perceived student complaints were significantly higher among respondents from rural schools (n=184) than from urban (n=127) or suburban (n=171) schools. Respondents at rural schools also were more likely to report that they perceived that fewer students were purchasing the meals and that students were consuming less of the meals than during the previous year. Perceived student complaints were higher at schools not offering regular (i.e., higher-fat) pizza. Respondents at socioeconomically disadvantaged schools (>66% of students eligible for free/reduced-priced meals) perceived that more students were buying lunch and that students were eating more of the meal than in the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of school personnel suggest reasonable acceptance of school lunches subsequent to revisions. Given the importance of offering healthful foods at school, the revised USDA meals standards are a promising strategy to improve the diets of children.
Authors: Susan M Krebs-Smith; Patricia M Guenther; Amy F Subar; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Kevin W Dodd Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: May Nawal Lutfiyya; Martin S Lipsky; Jennifer Wisdom-Behounek; Melissa Inpanbutr-Martinkus Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Nicole Vaudrin; Kristen Lloyd; Michael J Yedidia; Michael Todd; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Daniel R Taber; Jamie F Chriqui; Lisa M Powell; Frank M Perna; Whitney R Robinson; Frank J Chaloupka Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Lawrence J Appel; Alice H Lichtenstein; Emily A Callahan; Alan Sinaiko; Linda Van Horn; Laurie Whitsel Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Roni A Neff; Daniel A Zaltz; Amelie A Hecht; Russell R Pate; Brian Neelon; Jennifer R O'Neill; Sara E Benjamin-Neelon Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 5.717