Daniel R Taber1, Jamie F Chriqui2, Lisa M Powell3, Frank M Perna4, Whitney R Robinson5, Frank J Chaloupka6. 1. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston-Austin Regional Campus, 1616 Guadalupe St., Suite 6.300, Austin, TX 78701. Daniel.Taber@uth.tmc.edu. 2. University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 W. Roosevelt Rd., Chicago, IL 60608. jchriqui@uic.edu. 3. University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 W. Roosevelt Rd., Chicago, IL 60608. powelll@uic.edu. 4. Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Room 3E104, Rockville, MD 20850. pernafm@mail.nih.gov. 5. Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2104B McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435. whitney_robinson@unc.edu. 6. University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 W. Roosevelt Rd., Chicago, IL 60608. fjc@uic.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schools of low socioeconomic status (SES) tend to sell fewer healthy competitive foods/beverages. This study examined whether state competitive food laws may reduce such disparities. METHODS: School administrators for fifth- and eighth grade reported foods and beverages sold in school. Index measures of the food/beverage environments were constructed from these data. Schools were classified into SES tertiles based on median household income of students' postal zip code. Regression models were used to estimate SES differences in (1) Healthy School Food Environment Index (HSFEI) score, Healthy School Beverage Environment Index (HSBEI) score, and specific food/beverage sales, and (2) associations between state competitive food/beverage laws and HSFEI score, HSBEI score, and specific food/beverage sales. RESULTS: Strong competitive food laws were positively associated with HSFEI in eighth grade, regardless of SES. Strong competitive beverage laws were positively associated with HSBEI particularly in low-SES schools in eighth grade. These associations were attributable to schools selling fewer unhealthy items, not providing healthy alternatives. High-SES schools sold more healthy items than low-SES schools regardless of state laws. CONCLUSIONS: Strong competitive food laws may reduce access to unhealthy foods/beverages in middle schools, but additional initiatives are needed to provide students with healthy options, particularly in low-SES areas.
BACKGROUND: Schools of low socioeconomic status (SES) tend to sell fewer healthy competitive foods/beverages. This study examined whether state competitive food laws may reduce such disparities. METHODS: School administrators for fifth- and eighth grade reported foods and beverages sold in school. Index measures of the food/beverage environments were constructed from these data. Schools were classified into SES tertiles based on median household income of students' postal zip code. Regression models were used to estimate SES differences in (1) Healthy School Food Environment Index (HSFEI) score, Healthy School Beverage Environment Index (HSBEI) score, and specific food/beverage sales, and (2) associations between state competitive food/beverage laws and HSFEI score, HSBEI score, and specific food/beverage sales. RESULTS: Strong competitive food laws were positively associated with HSFEI in eighth grade, regardless of SES. Strong competitive beverage laws were positively associated with HSBEI particularly in low-SES schools in eighth grade. These associations were attributable to schools selling fewer unhealthy items, not providing healthy alternatives. High-SES schools sold more healthy items than low-SES schools regardless of state laws. CONCLUSIONS: Strong competitive food laws may reduce access to unhealthy foods/beverages in middle schools, but additional initiatives are needed to provide students with healthy options, particularly in low-SES areas.
Authors: Xiaozhong Wen; Matthew W Gillman; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Bettylou Sherry; Ken Kleinman; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Daniel R Taber; Jamie F Chriqui; Christopher M Quinn; Leah M Rimkus; Frank J Chaloupka Journal: Health Place Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Hannah G Lane; Hannah G Calvert; Rachel Deitch; Ryan Harris; Oyinlola T Babatunde; Lindsey Turner; Erin R Hager; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts Journal: Health Place Date: 2020-09-06 Impact factor: 4.931
Authors: Lily Grigsby-Duffy; Ruby Brooks; Tara Boelsen-Robinson; Miranda R Blake; Kathryn Backholer; Claire Palermo; Anna Peeters Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Ruth Link-Gelles; Daniel Westreich; Allison E Aiello; Nong Shang; David J Weber; Corinne Holtzman; Karen Scherzinger; Arthur Reingold; William Schaffner; Lee H Harrison; Jennifer B Rosen; Susan Petit; Monica Farley; Ann Thomas; Jeffrey Eason; Christine Wigen; Meghan Barnes; Ola Thomas; Shelley Zansky; Bernard Beall; Cynthia G Whitney; Matthew R Moore Journal: SSM Popul Health Date: 2016-12