BACKGROUND: Hepatoblastoma is a malignancy of young children. Low birth weight is associated with significantly increased risk of hepatoblastoma and neonatal medical exposures are hypothesized as contributors. This study represents the largest case-control study of hepatoblastoma to date and aimed to define the role of neonatal exposures in hepatoblastoma risk among low birth weight children. PROCEDURE: Incident hepatoblastoma cases who were born <2,500 g (N = 60), diagnosed between 2000 and 2008, were identified through the Children's Oncology Group. Controls were recruited through state birth registries (N = 51). Neonatal medical exposures were abstracted from medical records. Subjects from the Vermont Oxford Network were used for further comparisons, as were existing reports on neonatal medical exposures. RESULTS: Case-control comparisons were hindered by poor matching within birth weight strata. Cases were smaller and received more aggressive neonatal treatment compared to controls, and reflected high correlation levels between birth weight and treatments. Similar difficulty was encountered when comparing cases to Vermont Oxford Network subjects; cases were smaller and required more aggressive neonatal therapy. Furthermore, it appears hepatoblastoma cases were exposed to a greater number of diagnostic X-rays than in case series previously reported in the neonatal literature. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the largest case series of hepatoblastoma in <2,500 g birth weight infants with accompanying neonatal medical exposure data. Findings confirm that birth weight is highly correlated with exposure intensity, and neonatal exposures are themselves highly correlated, which hampers the identification of a causal exposure among hepatoblastoma cases. Experimental models or genetic susceptibility testing may be more revealing of etiology.
BACKGROUND:Hepatoblastoma is a malignancy of young children. Low birth weight is associated with significantly increased risk of hepatoblastoma and neonatal medical exposures are hypothesized as contributors. This study represents the largest case-control study of hepatoblastoma to date and aimed to define the role of neonatal exposures in hepatoblastoma risk among low birth weight children. PROCEDURE: Incident hepatoblastoma cases who were born <2,500 g (N = 60), diagnosed between 2000 and 2008, were identified through the Children's Oncology Group. Controls were recruited through state birth registries (N = 51). Neonatal medical exposures were abstracted from medical records. Subjects from the Vermont Oxford Network were used for further comparisons, as were existing reports on neonatal medical exposures. RESULTS: Case-control comparisons were hindered by poor matching within birth weight strata. Cases were smaller and received more aggressive neonatal treatment compared to controls, and reflected high correlation levels between birth weight and treatments. Similar difficulty was encountered when comparing cases to Vermont Oxford Network subjects; cases were smaller and required more aggressive neonatal therapy. Furthermore, it appears hepatoblastoma cases were exposed to a greater number of diagnostic X-rays than in case series previously reported in the neonatal literature. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the largest case series of hepatoblastoma in <2,500 g birth weight infants with accompanying neonatal medical exposure data. Findings confirm that birth weight is highly correlated with exposure intensity, and neonatal exposures are themselves highly correlated, which hampers the identification of a causal exposure among hepatoblastoma cases. Experimental models or genetic susceptibility testing may be more revealing of etiology.
Authors: Susan E Puumala; Julie A Ross; James H Feusner; Gail E Tomlinson; Marcio H Malogolowkin; Mark D Krailo; Logan G Spector Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: K Maruyama; H Ikeda; T Koizumi; Y Tsuchida; M Tanimura; H Nishida; N Takahashi; M Fujimura; Y Tokunaga Journal: Pediatr Int Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 1.524
Authors: S de Fine Licht; L S Schmidt; N H Rod; K Schmiegelow; P M Lähteenmäki; P Kogner; C Träger; T Stokland; J Schüz Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Jessica R B Musselman; Michael K Georgieff; Julie A Ross; Gail E Tomlinson; James Feusner; Mark Krailo; Logan G Spector Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Sarah A Comerford; Elizabeth A Hinnant; Yidong Chen; Hima Bansal; Shawn Klapproth; Dinesh Rakheja; Milton J Finegold; Dolores Lopez-Terrada; Kathryn A O'Donnell; Gail E Tomlinson; Robert E Hammer Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-10-06
Authors: Talita Ferreira Marques Aguiar; Maria Prates Rivas; Silvia Costa; Mariana Maschietto; Tatiane Rodrigues; Juliana Sobral de Barros; Anne Caroline Barbosa; Renan Valieris; Gustavo R Fernandes; Debora R Bertola; Monica Cypriano; Silvia Regina Caminada de Toledo; Angela Major; Israel Tojal; Maria Lúcia de Pinho Apezzato; Dirce Maria Carraro; Carla Rosenberg; Cecilia Maria Lima da Costa; Isabela W Cunha; Stephen Frederick Sarabia; Dolores-López Terrada; Ana Cristina Victorino Krepischi Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Talita Aguiar; Anne Teixeira; Marília O Scliar; Juliana Sobral de Barros; Renan B Lemes; Silvia Souza; Giovanna Tolezano; Fernanda Santos; Israel Tojal; Monica Cypriano; Silvia Regina Caminada de Toledo; Eugênia Valadares; Raquel Borges Pinto; Osvaldo Afonso Pinto Artigalas; Joaquim Caetano de Aguirre Neto; Estela Novak; Lilian Maria Cristofani; Sofia M Miura Sugayama; Vicente Odone; Isabela Werneck Cunha; Cecilia Maria Lima da Costa; Carla Rosenberg; Ana Krepischi Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.772