Literature DB >> 10794788

Effects of gestation and birth weight on the growth and development of very low birthweight small for gestational age infants: a matched group comparison.

T Gutbrod1, D Wolke, B Soehne, B Ohrt, K Riegel.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the effects of small for gestational age (SGA) in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants on growth and development until the fifth year of life.
METHODS: VLBW (< 1500 g) infants, selected from a prospective study, were classified as SGA (n = 115) on the basis of birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age and were compared with two groups of appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants matched according to birth weight (AGA-BW; n = 115) or gestation at birth (AGA-GA; n = 115). Prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal risk factors were recorded, and duration and intensity of treatment were computed from daily assessments. Body weight, length, and head circumference were measured at birth, five and 20 months (corrected for prematurity), and at 56 months. General development was assessed at five and 20 months with the Griffiths scale of babies abilities, and cognitive development at 56 months with the Columbia mental maturity scales, a vocabulary (AWST) and language comprehension test (LSVTA).
RESULTS: Significant group differences were found in complications (pregnancy, birth, and neonatal), parity, and multiple birth rate. The AGA-GA group showed most satisfactory growth up to 56 months, with both the AGA-BW and SGA groups lagging behind. The AGA-GA group also scored significantly more highly on all developmental and cognitive tests than the other groups. Developmental test results were similar for the SGA and AGA-BW groups at five and 20 months, but AGA-BW infants (lowest gestation) had lower scores on performance intelligence quotient and language comprehension at 56 months than the SGA group. When prenatal and neonatal complications, parity, and multiple birth were accounted for, group differences in growth remained, but differences in cognitive outcome disappeared after five months.
CONCLUSIONS: Being underweight and with a short gestation (SGA and VLBW) leads to poor weight gain and head growth in infancy but does not result in poorer growth than in infants of the same birth weight but shorter gestation (AGA-BW) in the long term. SGA is related to early developmental delay and later language problems; however, neonatal complications may have a larger detrimental effect on long term cognitive development of VLBW infants than whether they are born SGA or AGA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10794788      PMCID: PMC1721075          DOI: 10.1136/fn.82.3.f208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  22 in total

Review 1.  Language problems in neonatal at risk children: towards an understanding of developmental mechanisms.

Authors:  D Wolke
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 2.  Fetal biochemistry in growth retardation.

Authors:  P W Soothill; R A Ajayi; K N Nicolaides
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1992 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Very low birth weight and growth to age 8 years. I: Weight and height.

Authors:  W H Kitchen; L W Doyle; G W Ford; C Callanan
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1992-01

4.  Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts.

Authors:  D Wolke; B Söhne; B Ohrt; K Riegel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-02-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants with intrauterine growth retardation: comparison with control subjects matched by birth weight and gestational age.

Authors:  I K Sung; B Vohr; W Oh
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  The "brain-sparing" effect: antenatal cerebral Doppler findings in relation to neurologic outcome in very preterm infants.

Authors:  S A Scherjon; H Smolders-DeHaas; J H Kok; H A Zondervan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Developmental outcome and followup of the small for gestational age infant.

Authors:  M C Allen
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  Development and perinatal risk factors of very low-birth-weight infants. Small versus appropriate for gestational age.

Authors:  N Veelken; K Stollhoff; M Claussen
Journal:  Neuropediatrics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.947

9.  Psychological development in children born with very low birth weight after severe intrauterine growth retardation: a 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  A C Smedler; G Faxelius; K Bremme; M Lagerström
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.299

10.  The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference.

Authors:  D Wolke; G Ratschinski; B Ohrt; K Riegel
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.183

View more
  49 in total

1.  Long term outcome of small versus appropriate size for gestational age co-twins/triplets.

Authors:  M Monset-Couchard; O de Bethmann; J-P Relier
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcome of very low birth weight babies at corrected age of 2 years.

Authors:  Kanya Mukhopadhyay; Prahbhjot Malhi; Rama Mahajan; Anil Narang
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Kidney development in the first year of life in small-for-gestational-age preterm infants.

Authors:  Efthalia Hotoura; Maria Argyropoulou; Frederica Papadopoulou; Vasilios Giapros; Aikaterini Drougia; Panayiotis Nikolopoulos; Styliani Andronikou
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-06-23

4.  Rate of weight gain in very-low birth weight Puerto Rican neonates.

Authors:  Maribel Campos; Lourdes García; Inés E García; Cynthia Rivera; Marta I Valcárcel
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.705

5.  Rates of early intervention referral and significant developmental delay, by birthweight and gestational age.

Authors:  Allison E Curry; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Meredith E Slopen; Katharine H McVeigh
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-07

6.  Working memory in preterm-born adults: load-dependent compensatory activity of the posterior default mode network.

Authors:  Marcel Daamen; Josef G Bäuml; Lukas Scheef; Christian Sorg; Barbara Busch; Nicole Baumann; Peter Bartmann; Dieter Wolke; Afra Wohlschläger; Henning Boecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Impaired structural connectivity between dorsal attention network and pulvinar mediates the impact of premature birth on adult visual-spatial abilities.

Authors:  Maria Berndt; Josef G Bäuml; Aurore Menegaux; Chun Meng; Marcel Daamen; Nicole Baumann; Claus Zimmer; Henning Boecker; Peter Bartmann; Dieter Wolke; Christian Sorg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  A machine learning investigation of volumetric and functional MRI abnormalities in adults born preterm.

Authors:  Jing Shang; Paul Fisher; Josef G Bäuml; Marcel Daamen; Nicole Baumann; Claus Zimmer; Peter Bartmann; Henning Boecker; Dieter Wolke; Christian Sorg; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Dominic B Dwyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Decreased BOLD fluctuations in lateral temporal cortices of premature born adults.

Authors:  Jing Shang; Josef G Bäuml; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Marcel Daamen; Nicole Baumann; Claus Zimmer; Peter Bartmann; Henning Boecker; Dieter Wolke; Christian Sorg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  White matter alterations of the corticospinal tract in adults born very preterm and/or with very low birth weight.

Authors:  Alina Jurcoane; Marcel Daamen; Lukas Scheef; Josef G Bäuml; Chun Meng; Afra M Wohlschläger; Christian Sorg; Barbara Busch; Nicole Baumann; Dieter Wolke; Peter Bartmann; Elke Hattingen; Henning Boecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.