Literature DB >> 25041228

Characteristics of the electrocardiogram in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Sara C Martinez1, Derrick Fansler, Jeffrey Lau, Eric L Novak, Susan M Joseph, Robert E Kleiger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are routinely obtained in patients with advanced congestive heart failure (CHF) before and after surgical implantation with a left-ventricular assist device (LVAD). As the number of patients with CHF is increasing, it is necessary to characterize the changes present in the ECG of patients with LVADs.
METHODS: ECGs of 43 patients pre- and postimplantation of a HeartMate II LVAD were compared to characterize the presence of an LVAD using the following six criteria (LVADS2 ): low limb-lead voltage, ventricular pacing, artifact (electrical), duration of the QRS > 120 milliseconds, ST-elevation in the lateral leads, and splintering of the QRS complex. Additionally, 50 ECGs of non-LVAD patients coded as "lateral myocardial infarction (MI)" and 50 ECGs coded as "ventricular pacing" were chosen at random and scored. Odds ratios were calculated using Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression models were built to predict the presence of an LVAD in all patients.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis of the pre- and post-LVAD ECGs confirmed that all criteria except the "Duration of QRS > 120 milliseconds" characterized the ECG of a patient with an LVAD. Electrical artifact and low limb-lead voltage yielded the greatest association with an LVAD-ECG.
CONCLUSIONS: The ECG of a patient with end-stage CHF significantly changes with LVAD implantation. The LVADS2 criteria provide a framework towards characterizing and establishing a new baseline of the ECG in a patient with a continuous-flow LVAD.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical; implantable devices-biventricular pacing/defibrillation; noninvasive techniques-electrocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25041228      PMCID: PMC6931880          DOI: 10.1111/anec.12181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  17 in total

Review 1.  Usefulness of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in the follow-up of patients with cardiac resynchronization devices. Part II.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Derived and displayed power consumption, flow, and pulsatility over a range of HeartMate II left ventricular assist device settings.

Authors:  Lars H Lund; Anders Gabrielsen; Linnea Tirén; Ann Hallberg; Kerstin El Karlsson; Maria J Eriksson
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 3.  Usefulness of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in the follow-up of patients with cardiac resynchronization devices. Part I.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.737

4.  Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy.

Authors:  Soon J Park; Carmelo A Milano; Antone J Tatooles; Joseph G Rogers; Robert M Adamson; D Eric Steidley; Gregory A Ewald; Kartik S Sundareswaran; David J Farrar; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 5.  Current axial-flow devices--the HeartMate II and Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ranjit John
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008

6.  Diagnosis of multiple infarcts from complex electrocardiograms during normal rhythm, left bundle-branch block, and ventricular pacing.

Authors:  John P Boineau
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.438

7.  The spectrum of complications following left ventricular assist device placement.

Authors:  Nance Yuan; George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Jeremiah G Allen; Derek G Ju; Justin M Schaffer; Stuart D Russell; Ashish S Shah; John V Conte
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.620

8.  A novel electrocardiographic predictor of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Roberto Mollo; Alessandro Cosenza; Ilaria Coviello; Alessandra Stazi; Giulio Russo; Angelo Villano; Alfonso Sestito; Gianluigi Bencardino; Gaetano A Lanza; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Anne B Curtis; Seth J Worley; Philip B Adamson; Eugene S Chung; Imran Niazi; Lou Sherfesee; Timothy Shinn; Martin St John Sutton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Single-centre experience of 85 patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: clinical practice and outcome after extended support.

Authors:  Sjoukje I Lok; Jerson R Martina; Tim Hesselink; Ben F M Rodermans; Nelienke Hulstein; Bjorn Winkens; Corinne Klöpping; J Hans Kirkels; Pieter A Doevendans; Faiz Ramjankhan; Roel A de Weger; Nicolaas de Jonge; Jaap R Lahpor
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.191

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan S Gordon; Elizabeth J Maynes; Thomas J O'Malley; Behzad B Pavri; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Pulseless Electrical Activity during Polysomnography.

Authors:  Safal Shetty; Tam Le; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 3.  [Recommendations for emergency management of patients with permanent mechanical circulatory support : Consensus statement of DGTHG, DIVI, DGIIN, DGAI, DGINA, DGfK and DGK].

Authors:  Kevin Pilarczyk; Udo Boeken; Andreas Beckmann; Andreas Markewitz; P Christian Schulze; Martin Pin; Ingo Gräff; Sebastian Schmidt; Birk Runge; Hans-Jörg Busch; Michael R Preusch; Nils Haake; Gereon Schälte; Jan Gummert; Guido Michels
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Suppression of electromagnetic interference in electroretinography from a patient with an implanted left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

Authors:  Rebecca M Schur; Brendan L Eck; Alex Yuan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Christos Zormpas; Jörg Eiringhaus; Henrike A K Hillmann; Stephan Hohmann; Johanna Müller-Leisse; Jan D Schmitto; Christian Veltmann; David Duncker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Left Ventricular Assist Device Management in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Paul Trinquero; Andrew Pirotte; Lauren P Gallagher; Kimberly M Iwaki; Christopher Beach; Jane E Wilcox
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-26

7.  Reducing ECG Artifact From Left Ventricular Assist Device Electromagnetic Interference.

Authors:  Zak Loring; Sounok Sen; Eric Black-Maier; Brett D Atwater; Stuart D Russell; Adam D DeVore; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.