Literature DB >> 22113748

Usefulness of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in the follow-up of patients with cardiac resynchronization devices. Part II.

S Serge Barold1, Bengt Herweg.   

Abstract

The interval from the pacemaker stimulus to the onset of the earliest paced QRS complex (latency) may be prolonged during left ventricular (LV) pacing. Marked latency is more common with LV than right ventricular (RV) pacing because of indirect stimulation through a coronary vein and higher incidence of LV pathology including scars. During simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing a prolonged latency interval may give rise to an ECG dominated by the pattern of RV pacing with a left bundle branch block configuration and commonly a QS complex in lead V1. With marked latency programming the V-V interval (LV before RV) often restore the dominant R wave in lead V1 representing the visible contribution of the LV to overall myocardial depolarization. When faced with a negative QRS complex in lead V1 during simultaneous BiV pacing especially in setting of a relatively short PR interval, the most likely diagnosis is ventricular fusion with the intrinsic rhythm. Fusion may cause misinterpretation of the ECG because narrowing of the paced QRS complex simulates appropriate BiV capture. The diagnosis of fusion depends on temporary reprogramming a very short atrio-ventricular delay or an asynchronous BiV pacing mode. Sequential programming of various interventricular (V-V) delays may bring out a diagnostic dominant QRS complex in lead V1 that was previously negative with simultaneous LV and RV apical pacing even in the absence of an obvious latency problem. The emergence of a dominant R wave by V-V programming strongly indicates that the LV lead captures the LV from the posterior or the posterolateral coronary vein and therefore rules out pacing from the middle or anterior coronary vein. In some cardiac resynchronization systems LV pacing is achieved with the tip electrode of the LV lead as the cathode and the proximal electrode of the bipolar RV as the anode. This arrangement creates a common anode for both RV and LV pacing. RV anodal capture can occur at a high LV output during BiV pacing when it may cause slight ECG changes. During LV only pacing (RV channel turned off) RV anodal pacing may also occur in a more obvious form so that the ECG looks precisely like that during BiV pacing. RV anodal stimulation may complicate threshold testing and ECG interpretation and should not be misinterpreted as pacemaker malfunction. Programming the V-V interval (LV before RV) in the setting of RV anodal stimulation cancels the V-V timing to zero.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22113748     DOI: 10.5603/cj.2011.0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol J        ISSN: 1898-018X            Impact factor:   2.737


  7 in total

Review 1.  ECG Patterns In Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Antonius van Stipdonk; Sofieke Wijers; Mathias Meine; Kevin Vernooy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

2.  Incidence, predictors, and impact on outcome of increased left ventricular latency in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Antonio D'Onofrio; Salvatore Ivan Caico; Assunta Iuliano; Paolo Pieragnoli; Valter Bianchi; Daniela Orsida; Antonio Pani; Mario Pasqualini; Francesca Amadori; Ludovico Vasquez; Antonello Talarico; Chiara Minoia; Roberto Ospizio; Greta Merlotti; Maurizio Malacrida; Giuseppe Stabile
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  QRS Complex Detection and Measurement Algorithms for Multichannel ECGs in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients.

Authors:  Antonia E Curtin; Kevin V Burns; Alan J Bank; Theoden I Netoff
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.316

4.  Characteristics of the electrocardiogram in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Sara C Martinez; Derrick Fansler; Jeffrey Lau; Eric L Novak; Susan M Joseph; Robert E Kleiger
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  The postimplantation electrocardiogram predicts clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Edward Coverstone; Justin Sheehy; Robert E Kleiger; Timothy W Smith
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 6.  Ventricular pacing - Electromechanical consequences and valvular function.

Authors:  Elisa Ebrille; Christopher V DeSimone; Vaibhav R Vaidya; Anwar A Chahal; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-03-04

7.  Electrocardiographic patterns in biventricular pacing delivered by second-generation cardiac resynchronization devices.

Authors:  Amirfarjam Fazelifar; Fatemeh Jorfi; Majid Haghjoo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-11-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.