Literature DB >> 25040485

The early effects of Medicare's mandatory hospital pay-for-performance program.

Andrew M Ryan1, James F Burgess, Michael F Pesko, William B Borden, Justin B Dimick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of hospital value-based purchasing (HVBP) on clinical quality and patient experience during its initial implementation period (July 2011-March 2012). DATA SOURCES: Hospital-level clinical quality and patient experience data from Hospital Compare from up to 5 years before and three quarters after HVBP was initiated. STUDY
DESIGN: Acute care hospitals were exposed to HVBP by mandate while critical access hospitals and hospitals located in Maryland were not exposed. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis, comparing performance on 12 incentivized clinical process and 8 incentivized patient experience measures between hospitals exposed to the program and a matched comparison group of nonexposed hospitals. We also evaluated whether hospitals that were ultimately exposed to HVBP may have anticipated the program by improving quality in advance of its introduction. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Difference-in-differences estimates indicated that hospitals that were exposed to HVBP did not show greater improvement for either the clinical process or patient experience measures during the program's first implementation period. Estimates from our preferred specification showed that HVBP was associated with a 0.51 percentage point reduction in composite quality for the clinical process measures (p > .10, 95 percent CI: -1.37, 0.34) and a 0.30 percentage point reduction in composite quality for the patient experience measures (p > .10, 95 percent CI: -0.79, 0.19). We found some evidence that hospitals improved performance on clinical process measures prior to the start of HVBP, but no evidence of this phenomenon for the patient experience measures.
CONCLUSIONS: The timing of the financial incentives in HVBP was not associated with improved quality of care. It is unclear whether improvement for the clinical process measures prior to the start of HVBP was driven by the expectation of the program or was the result of other factors. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pay-for-performance; econometrics; health services research; hospitals

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25040485      PMCID: PMC4319872          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  20 in total

1.  Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Rushika Fernandopulle; HyunSook Ryu Song; Bruce Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Making the best of hospital pay for performance.

Authors:  Andrew Ryan; Jan Blustein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  What's the return? Assessing the effect of "pay-for-performance" initiatives on the quality of care delivery.

Authors:  Stephen R Grossbart
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Will value-based purchasing increase disparities in care?

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Medicare program; hospital inpatient value-based purchasing program. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2011-05-06

Review 6.  An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Martin P Eccles; Sasha Shepperd; Anthony Scott; Elena Parmelli; Fiona R Beyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

7.  Hospital pay-for-performance programs in Maryland produced strong results, including reduced hospital-acquired conditions.

Authors:  Sule Calikoglu; Robert Murray; Dianne Feeney
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Time to get serious about pay for performance.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The Center For Medicare And Medicaid Innovation's blueprint for rapid-cycle evaluation of new care and payment models.

Authors:  William Shrank
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Karen E Joynt; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  24 in total

1.  Higher Incentive Payments in Medicare Advantage's Pay-for-Performance Program Did Not Improve Quality But Did Increase Plan Offerings.

Authors:  Timothy J Layton; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Changes in Hospital Quality Associated with Hospital Value-Based Purchasing.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Sam Krinsky; Kristin A Maurer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Elements of Program Design in Medicare's Value-based and Alternative Payment Models: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt Maddox; Aditi P Sen; Lok Wong Samson; Rachael B Zuckerman; Nancy DeLew; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Current State of Value-Based Purchasing Programs.

Authors:  Tingyin T Chee; Andrew M Ryan; Jason H Wasfy; William B Borden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Moneyball in Medicare.

Authors:  Edward C Norton; Jun Li; Anup Das; Lena M Chen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Introducing Value-Based Purchasing into TRICARE Reform.

Authors:  Susan D Hosek; Melony E Sorbero; Grant Martsolf; Ryan Kandrack
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2017-01-13

7.  A comparison of methods for health policy evaluation with controlled pre-post designs.

Authors:  Stephen O'Neill; Noemi Kreif; Matt Sutton; Richard Grieve
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Linking Quality and Spending to Measure Value for People with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Phillip E Rodgers
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 9.  Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  Adding A Spending Metric To Medicare's Value-Based Purchasing Program Rewarded Low-Quality Hospitals.

Authors:  Anup Das; Edward C Norton; David C Miller; Andrew M Ryan; John D Birkmeyer; Lena M Chen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.