Literature DB >> 27245648

Current State of Value-Based Purchasing Programs.

Tingyin T Chee1, Andrew M Ryan1, Jason H Wasfy1, William B Borden2.   

Abstract

The US healthcare system is rapidly moving toward rewarding value. Recent legislation, such as the Affordable Care Act and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, solidified the role of value-based payment in Medicare. Many private insurers are following Medicare's lead. Much of the policy attention has been on programs such as accountable care organizations and bundled payments; yet, value-based purchasing (VBP) or pay-for-performance, defined as providers being paid fee-for-service with payment adjustments up or down based on value metrics, remains a core element of value payment in Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future. This review article summarizes the current state of VBP programs and provides analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for the future. Multiple inpatient and outpatient VBP programs have been implemented and evaluated; the impact of those programs has been marginal. Opportunities to enhance the performance of VBP programs include improving the quality measurement science, strengthening both the size and design of incentives, reducing health disparities, establishing broad outcome measurement, choosing appropriate comparison targets, and determining the optimal role of VBP relative to alternative payment models. VBP programs will play a significant role in healthcare delivery for years to come, and they serve as an opportunity for providers to build the infrastructure needed for value-oriented care.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  costs and cost analysis; outcome assessment (health care); reimbursement mechanisms; value-based purchasing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27245648      PMCID: PMC5378385          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.010268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  32 in total

1.  Improving evaluations of value-based purchasing programs.

Authors:  Megan McHugh; Maulik Joshi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer; Denise Remus; Sheila Roman; Michael B Rothberg; Evan M Benjamin; Allen Ma; Dale W Bratzler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Jonathan T Kolstad; Elizabeth A Stuart; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  A framework for evaluating the formation, implementation, and performance of accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; Stephen M Shortell; Sara A Kreindler; Aricca D Van Citters; Bridget K Larson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program; Accountable Care Organizations--Revised Benchmark Rebasing Methodology, Facilitating Transition to Performance-Based Risk, and Administrative Finality of Financial Calculations. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2016-06-10

6.  Accountable Care Organizations: Ensuring Focus on Cardiovascular Health.

Authors:  Kavita K Patel; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Jeffrey Nadel; Deborah J Cohen; Eric C Stecker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Seth W Glickman; Fang-Shu Ou; Elizabeth R DeLong; Matthew T Roe; Barbara L Lytle; Jyotsna Mulgund; John S Rumsfeld; W Brian Gibler; E Magnus Ohman; Kevin A Schulman; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood; Hugh Gravelle; David Reeves; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Urara Hiroeh; Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Long-term effect of hospital pay for performance on mortality in England.

Authors:  Søren Rud Kristensen; Rachel Meacock; Alex J Turner; Ruth Boaden; Ruth McDonald; Martin Roland; Matthew Sutton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Reduced mortality with hospital pay for performance in England.

Authors:  Matt Sutton; Silviya Nikolova; Ruth Boaden; Helen Lester; Ruth McDonald; Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  34 in total

1.  Length of hospital stay and its impact on subsequent early readmission in patients with acute heart failure: a report from the WET-HF Registry.

Authors:  Hidenori Moriyama; Takashi Kohno; Shun Kohsaka; Yasuyuki Shiraishi; Ryoma Fukuoka; Yuji Nagatomo; Ayumi Goda; Atsushi Mizuno; Keiichi Fukuda; Tsutomu Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Measuring Emergency Care Survival: The Implications of Risk-Adjusting for Race and Poverty.

Authors:  Kimon L H Ioannides; Avi Baehr; David N Karp; Douglas J Wiebe; Brendan G Carr; Daniel N Holena; M Kit Delgado
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Effects of Practice Turnover on Primary Care Quality Improvement Implementation.

Authors:  Andrea N Baron; Jennifer R Hemler; Shannon M Sweeney; Tanisha Tate Woodson; Allison Cuthel; Benjamin F Crabtree; Deborah J Cohen
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Whose Benchmark Is Right? Validating Venous Thromboembolism Events Between Trauma Registries and Hospital Administrative Databases.

Authors:  Todd A Miano; Grigor Abelian; Mark J Seamon; Kristen Chreiman; Patrick M Reilly; Niels D Martin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Bridging the Gaps in Personalized Medicine Value Assessment: A Review of the Need for Outcome Metrics across Stakeholders and Scientific Disciplines.

Authors:  William S Bush; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Mark F Beno; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Hospital Teaching Status and Medicare Expenditures for Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery.

Authors:  Qinyu Chen; Fabio Bagante; Katiuscha Merath; Jay Idrees; Eliza W Beal; Jordan Cloyd; Mary Dillhoff; Carl Schmidt; Adrian Diaz; Susan White; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Perioperative Pain Management and Opioid Stewardship: A Practical Guide.

Authors:  Sara J Hyland; Kara K Brockhaus; William R Vincent; Nicole Z Spence; Michelle M Lucki; Michael J Howkins; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 8.  The Digital Outcome Measure.

Authors:  Adam B Cohen; Simon C Mathews
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2018-09-21

9.  Classifying intervention modifications in the community pharmacy context: A demonstration study.

Authors:  Benjamin S Teeter; Jeremy L Thomas; Geoffrey M Curran; Appathurai Balamurugan
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2020-08-21

Review 10.  ImPlementation REsearCh to DEvelop Interventions for People Living with HIV (the PRECluDE consortium): Combatting chronic disease comorbidities in HIV populations through implementation research.

Authors:  Joyonna Carrie Gamble-George; Christopher T Longenecker; Allison R Webel; David H Au; Arleen F Brown; Hayden Bosworth; Kristina Crothers; William E Cunningham; Kevin A Fiscella; Alison B Hamilton; Christian D Helfrich; Joseph A Ladapo; Amneris Luque; Jonathan N Tobin; Gail E Wyatt
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 8.194

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.