Literature DB >> 25034857

Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus isolates: the "mec alphabet" with specific consideration of mecC, a mec homolog associated with zoonotic S. aureus lineages.

Karsten Becker1, Britta Ballhausen2, Robin Köck3, André Kriegeskorte2.   

Abstract

Livestock-associated (LA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have globally emerged during the past decade. In Europe, this was particularly due to the occurrence of LA-MRSA strains associated with the clonal complex (CC) 398 as defined by multilocus sequence typing. However, more recently animal-adapted clonal lineages of S. aureus showing phenotypic methicillin resistance have been identified such as CC130, CC599, CC59, CC1943 and CC425. These newly emerging LA-MRSA CCs/STs caused infections in animals and zoonoses in humans. In contrast to other S. aureus clonal lineages, the methicillin resistance of the latter CCs/STs is based on a mecA gene homolog, designated mecC, which is part of a distinct SCCmec type (SCCmec XI). Including mecB found in Macrococcus caseolyticus, henceforth, the "mec alphabet" comprises three major gene types with several allotypes. As known for mecA, the gene homolog mecC is also not restricted to S. aureus, but found in several staphylococcal species including S. sciuri, S. stepanovicii and S. xylosus (mecC1 allotype). First investigations showed a wide geographical distribution of mecC-MRSA in Europe and a broad diversity of host species including livestock, companion and wildlife animals. In particular, wild rodents and insectivores might serve as reservoir for staphylococci harboring mecC. Economic burden may be caused by mastitis of dairy cattle. Livestock animals may likely serve as source for human infections with mecC-MRSA; reported cases comprise skin and soft tissue infections, osteomyelitis and bacteremia. Due to the divergent molecular nature of mecC-MRSA, its diagnostics is hampered by difficulties to verify the methicillin resistance using phenotypic as well as DNA-based procedures, which could have negative consequences for therapy of mecC-MRSA-caused infections.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Companion animal; Diagnostics; Livestock; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Wildlife animal; Zoonosis; mecC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25034857     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 1438-4221            Impact factor:   3.473


  42 in total

1.  A clonal complex 12 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain, West Australian MRSA-59, harbors a novel pseudo-SCCmec element.

Authors:  Stefan Monecke; Geoffrey W Coombs; Julie Pearson; Helmut Hotzel; Peter Slickers; Ralf Ehricht
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A Novel Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Type XI Primer for Detection of mecC-Harboring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Screening Specimens.

Authors:  Sabine Petersdorf; Miriam Herma; Meike Rosenblatt; Franziska Layer; Birgit Henrich
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The Novel Phage-Derived Antimicrobial Agent HY-133 Is Active against Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ursula Kaspar; Jorge A de Haro Sautto; Sonja Molinaro; Georg Peters; Evgeny A Idelevich; Karsten Becker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Ceftaroline Activity against mecC-Containing Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Sushmita D Lahiri; Richard A Alm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Genetic Diversity among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Showing Oxacillin and/or Cefoxitin Resistance Not Linked to the Presence of mec Genes.

Authors:  M Angeles Argudín; S Roisin; L Nienhaus; M Dodémont; R de Mendonça; C Nonhoff; A Deplano; O Denis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Detection of mecA- and mecC-Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolates by the New Xpert MRSA Gen 3 PCR Assay.

Authors:  Karsten Becker; Olivier Denis; Sandrine Roisin; Alexander Mellmann; Evgeny A Idelevich; Dennis Knaack; Sarah van Alen; André Kriegeskorte; Robin Köck; Frieder Schaumburg; Georg Peters; Britta Ballhausen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius colonizing healthy dogs in Saskatoon, Canada.

Authors:  Roshan Priyantha; Mathew C Gaunt; Joseph E Rubin
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 8.  Rapid Susceptibility Testing Methods.

Authors:  Kenneth P Smith; James E Kirby
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 1.935

9.  Comparison of Different Phenotypic Approaches To Screen and Detect mecC-Harboring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  André Kriegeskorte; Evgeny A Idelevich; Andreas Schlattmann; Franziska Layer; Birgit Strommenger; Olivier Denis; Gavin K Paterson; Mark A Holmes; Guido Werner; Karsten Becker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology.

Authors:  Sahreena Lakhundi; Kunyan Zhang
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.