Literature DB >> 25034357

Hyperactive piggyBac transposons for sustained and robust liver-targeted gene therapy.

Mario Di Matteo1, Emira Samara-Kuko2, Natalie J Ward3, Simon N Waddington4, Simon N Waddingon, John H McVey5, Marinee K L Chuah1, Thierry VandenDriessche1.   

Abstract

The development of robust nonviral vectors could facilitate clinical gene therapy applications and may overcome some of the immune complications of viral vectors. Nevertheless, most nonviral gene deliver approaches typically yield only transient and/or low gene expression. To address these caveats, we have explored piggyBac transposons to correct hemophilia B by liver-directed factor IX (FIX) gene therapy in hemophilic mice. To achieve this, we combined the use of: (i) a hyperactive codon-optimized piggyBac transposase, (ii) a computationally enhanced liver-specific promoter, (iii) a hyperfunctional codon-optimized FIX transgene (FIX R338L Padua), and (iv) a modification of the transposon terminal repeats. This combination strategy resulted in a robust 400-fold improvement in vector performance in hepatocytes, yielding stable supraphysiologic human FIX activity (>1 year). Liver-specific expression resulted in the induction of FIX-specific immune tolerance. Remarkably, only very low transposon/transposase doses were required to cure the bleeding diathesis. Similarly, PB transposons could be used to express supraphysiologic factor VIII levels using low transposon/transposase doses. PB transposition did not induce tumors in a sensitive hepatocellular carcinoma-prone mouse model. These results underscore the potency and relative safety of the latest generation PB transposons, which constitutes a versatile platform for stable and robust secretion of therapeutic proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25034357      PMCID: PMC4435487          DOI: 10.1038/mt.2014.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther        ISSN: 1525-0016            Impact factor:   11.454


Introduction

Clinical evidence demonstrates that gene therapy is effective to treat patients suffering from a wide range of hereditary diseases. This could be attributed largely to the improvement in viral vector–based gene transfer technologies. Despite these encouraging results, viral vectors can be inactivated by preexisting neutralizing antibodies that preclude gene transfer.[1] This is compounded by the induction of cytotoxic T-cell responses directed against the gene-modified cells, consequently preventing long-term gene expression. Moreover, manufacturing of clinical-grade viral vectors is challenging, and their restricted cargo capacity can hamper clinical translation. Nonviral gene transfer may overcome some of these limitations and offer some advantages, especially considering the capacity to accommodate larger inserts, the lack of preexisting host immunity, and reduced costs and time for the production of clinical-grade nonviral DNA plasmid–based vectors. Nevertheless, they typically do not stably integrate into the genome and consequently yield only transient expression of the gene of interest.[2] We and others have demonstrated that this could be overcome by using DNA transposons that stably integrate their therapeutic cargo into the target cell genome, enabling stable expression of the gene of interest.[3,4] The piggyBac (PB) transposon system, originally derived from the cabbage looper moth Trichoplusia ni,[5] is among the most promising transposons for gene therapy applications. To convert the PB transposon into a gene delivery tool, a binary system is required that is composed of an expression plasmid that encodes the PB transposase and a donor plasmid containing the gene of interest, which is flanked in cis by the transposon terminal repeat sequences required for transposition. PB transposons can efficiently transpose in mammalian cells[6,7] and can deliver large transgenes,[8] which cannot be readily accommodated into most viral vectors due to their intrinsic packaging constraints. PB has been efficiently applied as a tool for functional genomic studies, ex vivo genetic modification of somatic and embryonic cells and generation of induced pluripotent stem cells.[9,10] However, there are only few studies that focus on direct in vivo gene transfer with PB and most of these relied on reporter genes.[11,12,13,14,15] In this study, we explored the use of PB transposons for liver-directed gene therapy of hemophilia B, which has not yet been investigated. Hemophilia B is a hereditary bleeding disorder caused by a defective factor IX (FIX) gene. It is currently treated by repeated clotting factor infusions but this treatment is not curative.[16] Moreover, some patients develop neutralizing antibodies against the administered recombinant FIX protein that renders the therapy ineffective and bleeding episodes difficult to manage. Hence, hemophilia B is an attractive target disease to validate PB transposon-based gene therapy approaches, which has implications for other hereditary disorders,[3] including liver-borne diseases. The main objective of this study therefore consisted of establishing proof-of-concept that PB transposons encoding FIX can be used for liver-directed gene delivery to cure hemophilia B and to assess their overall efficacy and safety in appropriate mouse models. Maximizing the therapeutic index of a given gene transfer vector is a crucial step toward implementation of successful clinical trials. Hence, we wanted to augment the efficiency of transposon-mediated gene therapy using a multilayered strategy by optimizing each one of its components including the PB transposase and the transposon, the liver-specific promoter used to drive FIX and the FIX transgene itself. Our results demonstrated that PB transposons in conjunction with a mouse codon-optimized PB transposase (mPB) resulted in prolonged FIX expression and cure hemophilia B in FIX-deficient mice, which had not been shown previously. Moreover, we showed that the efficiency of PB-mediated gene therapy could be enhanced by using the latest generation hyperactive PB transposase (hyPB) and by modifying the transposon terminal repeats.[17,18,19] In addition, the use of a liver-specific promoter coupled to in silico designed cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) further increased FIX expression levels.[20,21,22] Finally, we demonstrated that the overall efficacy could be further increased by using a codon-optimized FIX containing a hyperfunctional gain-of-function mutation (i.e., FIX Padua R338L).[23,24] This combinatorial strategy resulted in robust FIX activity at supraphysiologic levels, substantially reducing the vector dose requirement for reaching therapeutic efficacy. Moreover, it enabled induction of immune tolerance to FIX and prevented the generation of anti-FIX antibodies on immunization with recombinant FIX. We also validated the use of the hyperactive PB platform for delivery of relatively large transgenes, such as FVIII as a gene therapy approach for hemophilia A. Using a highly sensitive tumor-prone hepatocellular carcinoma mouse model, we did not observe any significant increase in oncogenic risk upon PB transposition, suggesting that this improved hyperactive PB platform has a favorable safety profile.

Results

PB provides long-lasting therapeutic hFIX expression levels and phenotypic correction in hemophilia B mice

The codon usage optimized transposase (mPB)[25] was evaluated in combination with PB-hFIXIA () that carried a wild-type hFIX minigene (hFIXIA)[2] and PB-hFIXco () with a codon-optimized hFIX (hFIXco).[24,26,27] In addition, the PB-hFIXco transposon contained a small intron upstream of the hFIXco to boost FIX expression.[2,26] Both the hFIXIA and hFIXco were driven from a novel and potent chimeric liver-specific promoter that contained an in silico designed hepatocyte-specific cis-regulatory module, designated as HS-CRM8. This element conferred high liver-specific expression.[20,21,22] Liver-directed hydrodynamic cotransfection of the PB-hFIXIA transposon (10 μg) along with 2 μg mPB, resulted in stable therapeutic hFIX antigen and activity levels for >12 months in hemophilic FIX-deficient mice (). Similarly, liver-directed cotransfection of the PB-hFIXco transposon and mPB resulted in a significant ≈12-fold higher (P < 0.001) hFIX protein and activity level that stabilized in the supraphysiologic range (). In contrast, hFIX expression and activity gradually declined to basal levels in control mice that received either PBS or only the transposons in the absence of transposase (,). Anti-hFIX antibodies could not be detected (data not shown). Transposition is therefore necessary for sustained expression. The initial high peak of FIX expression is likely due to the presence of nonintegrated PB-hFIXIA or PB-hFIXco episomes due to the fact that we used an excess amount of transposon plasmid (10 μg). These episomes are gradually lost and are also epigenetically silenced (), consistent with previous observations.[2,28,29] Though the transposon copies per genome content were similar in the liver of animals that received equal doses of the PB-hFIXIA or PB-hFIXco transposons (), we observed a significant (P < 0.001) increase in hFIX mRNA level for the hFIXco than its wild-type counterpart (). This demonstrated that the optimized expression cassette, containing a small intron and a codon-usage optimized hFIX transgene (hFIXco), significantly increased mRNA levels concomitant with a robust increase in FIX protein expression level. Though codon optimization may in some cases enhance immunogenicity,[30] we found no evidence of an increased antibody response to the codon-optimized FIX protein. A low level of transposon copies () was apparent in the absence of any transposase-expressing plasmid 12 months posttransfection (designated as “empty” in ). Since a relatively high dose of PB transposons was used (10 μg), this likely contributed to the residual presence of episomally silenced unintegrated DNA, as shown previously.[2,28,29]

Increased therapeutic efficiency using the hyperactive PB platform

To further improve the efficiency of the PB platform, allowing the use of lower transposon/transposase doses, we subsequently explored the use of a hyPB.[17] This hyPB contained several mutated residues compared to the original codon usage optimized mPB (,). Liver-directed hydrodynamic transfection of severe combined immune deficient (SCID) mice with 500 ng of PB-hFIXco transposon along with 1,000 ng hyPB resulted in stable supraphysiologic hFIX levels corresponding to 200% of normal hFIX levels (). These FIX levels were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than what could be achieved with the original mPB transposase. Similarly, liver-directed transfection of SCID mice with 50 ng of PB-hFIXco transposon plasmid along with 100 ng hyPB resulted in a dose-dependent effect, yielding therapeutic hFIX levels corresponding to 20% of normal levels. This represented a significant 20-fold increase (P < 0.001) in FIX levels compared to when the mPB transposase was used (,). We next evaluated whether the terminal repeats IR and IR in combination with the hyPB could further improve the in vivo potency of the PB transposons. A significant 1.5-fold increase in hFIX expression was apparent when the IR was used compared to IR (,). Liver-directed transfection in SCID mice of the PB-hFIXco/IR () transposon (500 ng) along with 1,000 ng hyPB transposase-encoding plasmid resulted in stable FIX levels reaching ~300% of normal hFIX levels (). This represents a 100-fold improvement over the 3% FIX activity that could be attained when the hemophilia B was transfected with matched doses of PB-hFIXIA and mPB plasmids (). Similarly, at 10-fold lower PB-hFIXco/IR and hyPB doses, a dose-dependent decrease in hFIX expression was apparent, yielding 30% of normal hFIX levels. In contrast, FIX expression was not or only slightly increased (,) when the IR was used () compared to IR ().

Enhancing PB performance using hyperfunctional hFIX-R338L Padua

Subsequently, we tested whether the performance of this optimized hyPB and PB-hFIXco/IR platform could be further enhanced using a synthetic codon-optimized FIX transgene harboring a hyperactivating R338L (Padua) mutation.[23] We therefore constructed a PB-hFIXco-R338L/IR transposon () that was cotransfected along with a hyPB transposase-encoding construct into hemophilia B mice. Sustained FIX antigen levels could be obtained (,) with similar expression kinetics as in SCID mice (). The hFIXco-R338L protein exhibited a >6-fold higher specific FIX activity with respect to protein levels, yielding up to 1,200% FIX activity at the highest hFIXco-R338L/IR transposon dose (500 ng). Most importantly, this represents a robust 400-fold improvement over the 3% FIX activity that could be attained when the hemophilia B were transfected with matched doses of PB-hFIXIA and mPB plasmids (). Moreover, at the lowest dose of only 50 ng of PB-hFIXco-R338L/IR transposon and 100 ng hyPB transposase plasmid, supraphysiologic FIX activity could be attained (≈200%), whereas matched doses of PB-hFIXIA and mPB plasmids yielded no detectable FIX activity (). Interestingly, none of the hemophilia B mice treated with the PB transposons expressing hFIX or hFIX-R338L (Padua) developed an anti–hFIX-specific antibody response even in the face of immunization with recombinant hFIX protein and adjuvant (). This is consistent with the induction of hFIX-specific immune tolerance. Since FIX antigen levels and expression kinetics were similar in hemophilia B (,) and SCID mice (–), this further confirmed the lack of hFIX-specific immune responses. The superior potency of the hFIXco-R338L/IR transposon and hyPB transposase was confirmed by assessing phenotypic correction 4 months posttransfection in hemophilia B mice (). In particular, hemophilic mice treated with only 50 ng of PB-hFIXco-R338L/IR transposon and 100 ng hyPB transposase plasmid achieved hemostatic correction and consequently survived the tail-clip assay. In contrast, none of the hemophilic mice injected with matched doses of the PB-FIXIA transposon and mPB transposase plasmids survived the injury (). Transposon copies were similar in the liver of animals that received equal doses of PB transposons expressing hFIXco or hFIX-R338L (Padua) in the presence of hyPB () but were significantly higher than in mice injected PB transposons expressing hFIXIA in presence of mPB (P < 0.01) at both tested doses. Remarkably, hemophilic mice treated with only 50 ng of PB-hFIXco-R338L/IR transposon and 100 ng hyPB transposase plasmid achieved supraphysiologic hFIX activity () and rescue of the bleeding phenotype (). Transposon copies were further reduced (<0.1 copies/diploid genome) decreasing the risk of insertional oncogenesis.

Validating the hyperactive PB platform for FVIII delivery

We then extended these findings using the codon-optimized B-domain deleted FVIII (FVIIIΔBco).[31] Liver-directed hydrodynamic transfection of 500 ng of PB-hFVIIIΔBco/IR transposon along with 1,000 ng hyPB in SCID mice resulted in stable supraphysiologic hFVIII levels corresponding to 300% of normal hFVIII levels (). Conversely, in the absence of the hyperactive hyPB transposase, expression declined gradually to basal levels (). This confirms that stable genomic integration by transposition is required for stable hepatic FVIII gene expression. These results are consistent with the results obtained with the PB-FIX transposons.

Safety assessment in a tumor-prone hepatocellular carcinoma model

To assess the risk of insertional oncogenesis, we evaluated the safety profile of the PB platform in the diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mouse model that resembles human HCC. One month after DEN initiation[32] mice were transfected hydrodynamically with either 10 μg PB-hFIXIA transposon or 500 ng of PB-hFIXco in combination with 2 μg mPB plasmid (). These doses were chosen to obtain similar FIX expression levels and compare the intrinsic safety of both PB constructs. The tumor burden was assessed 36 weeks post-DEN initiation. We did not observe any significant differences in the number of HCC nodules between mice transfected with PB-hFIXIA or PB-hFIXco and mPB and PBS-injected mice (). In contrast, tumor incidence and progression was significantly (P < 0.001) increased in control mice that were hydrodynamically transfected with a PB-c-Myc transposon (), (number of nodules (>50), max tumor size (>50 mm) compared to PBS-injected mice (number of nodules (5.83 ± 1.42), max tumor size (5.70 ± 0.29 mm). This ultimately resulted in significant and accelerated mortality (i.e., median survival of 157 days) (), consistent with the well-established role of c-Myc in liver cancer.[33] It is noteworthy that a minimal yet significant increase in the number of HCC nodules was apparent in DEN-treated control mice that had undergone hydrodynamic transfection (with PBS) compared to noninjected DEN-treated mice. This suggests that the hydrodynamic procedure per se may provoke tumorigenesis, possibly by triggering a transient liver damage and inflammation associated with hepatocyte proliferation[34] (), consistent with previous observations.[35] This underscores the high sensitivity of the DEN-induced HCC model. To further rule out that PB transposons contributed to HCC in the DEN-induced mouse model, we assessed the PB copy number in normal liver tissue versus HCC nodules. Interestingly, the copy number of the PB-hFIXIA or PB-hFIXco transposons was higher in normal liver biopsies compared to the PB copy number in HCC nodules. Given the significant decrease in PB-hFIXIA or PB-hFIXco transposon copy number in HCC samples, this suggests that HCC initiation and/or progression was not associated with stable genomic transposon integration (). We hereby demonstrated that PB transposition in itself does not significantly increase tumorigenicity in this sensitive HCC tumor-prone mouse model, which underscores the relative safety of the PB-FIX platform. Conversely, the PB-c-Myc copy number was significantly increased in HCC nodules versus normal liver biopsies. This strongly suggests that c-Myc expression contributed to malignant transformation, consistent with natural selection of transformed hepatocyte clones that contained an increased number of PB-c-Myc vector copies.

Discussion

In this study, we established proof of concept that the PB platform can be used to obtain sustained expression (>1 year) of a therapeutically relevant transgene (i.e., FIX) leading to a phenotypic correction of the bleeding diathesis in hemophilia B mice. To our knowledge, this is the first report that shows phenotypic correction of a genetic disorder using the PB transposon platform with broad implications for the field at large. Transposition was necessary to ensure sustained FIX expression and stable correction of the bleeding phenotype, whereas FIX expression was transient in the absence of the PB transposase. Furthermore, we demonstrated that a robust 400-fold improvement in vector performance could be achieved using a multilayered approach by using a hyPB, by trimming the transposon terminal repeats (IR) and by optimizing the transgene expression cassette itself. The expression cassette encoded a codon-optimized FIX or its hyperactive FIX R338L (Padua) version that were driven from a robust chimeric liver-specific promoter. Consequently, only very low amounts of hyPB and PB transposons were needed to achieve supraphysiologic FIX activity levels in hemophilic mice paving the way towards preclinical large animal studies. The robust hepatocyte-specific FIX expression levels in the PB transposons could be attributed, to the use of the chimeric liver-specific TTR promoter coupled to the in silico designed hepatocyte-specific cis-regulatory modules (HS-CRM).[20,21,22] These CRMs contained evolutionary conserved clusters of transcription factor binding site motifs that conferred high liver-specific gene expression. Moreover, the modified vector design of the PB-hFIXco and PB-hFIXco-R338L transposons compared to PB-hFIXIA contributed to increased steady-state FIX mRNA levels. The increased activity of hFIXco-R338L (Padua) is consistent with our recent studies showing five- to sevenfold increase FIX activity after liver-directed gene therapy of integration-competent or defective lentiviral vectors,[24] which was confirmed independently based on adeno-associated viral vectors.[36] The in vivo performance of the PB-FIX transposons and hyPB transposase is consistent with previous reports showing sustained expression of reporter genes after liver-directed hydrodynamic gene delivery[11,12,13,14,15] and confirm the superiority of the hyperactive hyPB compared to the conventional mPB transposase. Moreover, in a recent study, PB transposons were shown to stably express α1-antitrypsin (AAT) in transfected hepatocytes in vivo.[14] Nevertheless, the PB platform had not been validated in a disease model, and the AAT expression levels attained were relatively modest. In this study, we also demonstrated that the hyPB platform could be used to express supraphysiologic levels of FVIII. The superior activity of the hyPB compared to mPB is likely due to the synergistic effect of the point mutations that enhance the transposition efficiency by increasing the protein levels and improve the mechanism and/or kinetics of transposition.[17] The increase in hFIX protein levels associated with the use of IR is likely due to increased PB transposition. However, an effect at the transcriptional level cannot be excluded. Trimming the terminal repeats may indeed prevent the binding of transcriptional repressors that may influence expression of the gene of interest. This hypothesis is consistent with the elevated FIX expression levels in mice transfected with the PB-hFIXco/IR transposon in the absence of the hyPB transposase. The FIX and FVIII levels that were attained compared favorably to other nonviral gene therapy approaches.[37,38,39,40] In particular, hydrodynamic transfection of Sleeping Beauty-based transposons encoding FIX in conjunction with the early SB10[41] or latest SB100X transposase[4] resulted in lower FIX expression levels and required 50 to100-fold higher doses of SB-FIX transposons (25–50 µg) compared to when the PB-hFIXco-R338L/IR transposon was used in conjunction with hyPB. This implies that the current optimized transposon vectors are least 50 to 100-fold more efficient than the state of the art. Alternative methods for nonviral liver-directed gene therapy relied on hydrodynamic plasmid or minicircle delivery, but these methods yielded lower and/or transient FIX expression.[2,42] The FIX levels that were obtained also compare favorably with what can typically be achieved with viral vectors, particularly lentiviral and AAV vectors.[24,43,44,45] The sustained hepatocyte-specific FIX expression in hemophilia B mice was consistent with the induction of hFIX-specific immune tolerance, which was maintained even on immunization with hFIX and immune adjuvant. This is consistent with the induction of immune tolerance following liver-directed gene therapy with AAV or lentiviral vectors when hepatocyte-specific promoters were employed, avoiding ectopic expression in antigen-presenting cells.[24,43,44,45] This indicates that the ability to induce FIX-specific immune tolerance is irrespective of the vector type and could be attributed to the specific microenvironment in the liver. The exact mechanism that accounted for the induction of immune tolerance in the liver is not fully understood but possibly involves the induction of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. The PB-hFIXIA () and PB-hFIXco () transposons used in this study differ with respect to (i) codon-optimization of the FIX cDNA and (ii) the use of a mini-intron from the MVM virus upstream of the FIX cDNA versus the use of intron A of FIX maintained in the natural position in between exons 1 and exon 2 (). The combined effect of these changes resulted in a 10-fold difference in FIX protein expression levels (,). We had previously shown that the net effect of FIX codon optimization by itself typically resulted in a two- to threefold increase in FIX protein expression.[24] This is likely due to an increase in translation initiation. Consequently, the effect of codon optimization by itself is not sufficient to account for the 10-fold difference in FIX protein expression levels. This could be explained by also taking into account the increase in steady-state FIX mRNA levels (). The increase in FIX mRNA levels could be due to the effect of the MVM intron. Furthermore, some of the nucleotide changes that were introduced in the FIX codons that were intended to boost translation may also have inadvertently increased transcription. The increase in FIX mRNA did not result in a proportionate increase in FIX protein levels. This suggests that posttranscriptional events may be limiting the control of FIX biosynthesis. We subsequently assessed the safety of this PB platform in the highly sensitive DEN-treated HCC-prone mice. In this model, DEN induces DNA damage, chronic liver injury and triggers local and systemic inflammatory reactions followed by compensatory hepatocyte proliferation.[46] Macroscopic and molecular analysis strongly suggests that PB transposition in itself does not enhance the tumorigenic risk. As a corollary, it would appear that the HS-CRM8 element does not increase the risk of insertional oncogenesis. Moreover, our stepwise improvements of the PB platform required less transposon integrations to obtain sustained therapeutic FIX levels (), further reducing the risk of insertional oncogenesis. Indeed, we showed that reducing the amount of plasmid used for hydrodynamic gene transfer correlates with a reduction in hepatocyte transfection in terms of transposon copy number (). Hydrodynamic transfection typically results in up to 10% of transfected hepatocytes in the mouse liver with a preference for the pericentral region of the hepatic acinus.[47,48] Consequently, this translates to 10-fold the number of integrants per cell that actually took up the PB transposons. In particular, a transposon copy number of 0.08 ± 0.007 per diploid genome (i.e., following transfection with 50 ng of PB-hFIXco-R338L/IRmicro transposon and 100 ng hyPB transposase plasmid) ( and ) would correspond to less than one copy per transfected hepatocyte. Such a low copy number minimizes the risk of insertional oncogenesis. While the level of expressed FIX is more relevant than the percent of FIX expressing hepatocytes for correcting the bleeding phenotype, it is important to consider that phenotypic correction of other diseases may require a significantly greater fraction of gene-modified hepatocytes. Exhaustive analysis of genomic integration sites of the hyPB platform in transfected hepatocytes in vivo will be the subject of future studies. Nevertheless, it is reassuring that integration site analyses of transfected human cells revealed previously that PB transposons do not favor integration into genes and showed a reduced frequency of integrations near transcriptional start sites.[14] To augment the specificity of PB integration into predefined loci, PB transposases were genetically fused to zinc finger[49,50] or transcription activator-like effector[51] domains specifically designed to target specific DNA sequences. However, the overall targeting efficiency was still limiting. Alternatively, genome-engineering approaches based on zinc finger nucleases and CRISPR/Cas9 are currently being explored as alternatives to achieve targeted integration in hepatocytes.[52,53] To further increase in vivo targeting efficiencies, high vector doses are typically required that are prohibitive for clinical translation.[52] The first-in-human transposon-based clinical studies have been initiated which further underscores its therapeutic potential.[54] The encouraging efficacy and safety profile shown in this study further supports the use of this PB platform for ultimate clinical applications. Liu and colleagues[55] have recently developed and validated an image-guided and computerized hydrodynamic gene delivery technique for hepatic gene delivery using large animal models. This improved method enables relatively efficient gene delivery by localized hydrodynamic liver delivery under controlled conditions, thereby minimizing liver damage compared to conventional hydrodynamic transfection methods. The efficacy and safety of this approach would need to be tested in canine hemophilia models. Ultimately, nanoparticle transfection technology could be used as an alternative to overcome some of the limitations of naked DNA hydrodynamic transfection, including TLR-mediated activation of the innate immune system.[37] Future research is required to validate the safety and efficacy of the PB platform in preclinical large animal models.

Materials and Methods

For details on the various materials and methods employed in this study, see Supplementary Data. The mPB and hyPB were custom synthesized and expressed from a cytomegalovirus promoter (,). An identical expression plasmid devoid of PB (“empty”) was used as control (). The terminal inverted repeats (IRs) of the transposon-containing plasmids () corresponded to truncated wild-type IRs[56,57] (IR), contained T53C and C136T point mutations (IR),[18] or were further truncated (IR).[19] The IR and IR were selected since they increased transposition efficiency based on in vitro studies. Wild-type, codon-optimized or hyperfunctional human factor IX cDNA () was expressed from a chimeric liver-specific promoter that was composed of a liver-specific minimal transthyretin (TTR) promoter in conjunction with a potent hepatocyte-specific cis-regulatory module (designated as HS-CRM8).[20,21,22] Similarly, the PB-FVIII () or PB-c-Myc transposon () used the same promoter to express the B-domain deleted FVIII or c-Myc, respectively. C57Bl/6JRj, CB17/IcrTac/Prkdcscid (SCID), or FIX-deficient hemophilia B mice in a C57Bl/6 background were employed. All animal procedures were approved by the institutional animal ethics committees. Mice were transfected by hydrodynamic liver transfection. We collected whole blood (≈200 µl) by phlebotomy of the retro-orbital plexus. The citrated plasma was stored at −80 °C. A tumor-prone HCC mouse model was established by DEN initiation.[32] One month later, mice were hydrodynamically injected. Survival was monitored, and HCC nodules were examined at 36 weeks. hFIX antigen and antibody levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described.[24] FVIII antigen levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, as described.[31] FIX activity was determined using a functional assay, and phenotypic correction was assessed in hemophilic mice using a tail-clip assay. Transposon copy number and transgene mRNA expression was determined by quantitative PCR and reverse transcriptase PCR, respectively. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). Statistical analyses were performed using a two-tailed unpaired Student's t-test. Results were presented as mean ± SEM.
Table 1

Variants related differences in hepatocyte transduction efficiency, hFIX protein yield and activity per injected dose in piggyBac treated hemophilis B mice

  57 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in transposon-mediated gene therapy.

Authors:  Mario Di Matteo; Eyayu Belay; Marinee K Chuah; Thierry Vandendriessche
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 2.  Hydrodynamic gene delivery: its principles and applications.

Authors:  Takeshi Suda; Dexi Liu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  PiggyBac transposon-based inducible gene expression in vivo after somatic cell gene transfer.

Authors:  Sai K Saridey; Li Liu; Joseph E Doherty; Aparna Kaja; Daniel L Galvan; Bradley S Fletcher; Matthew H Wilson
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  In vivo delivery of a microRNA-regulated transgene induces antigen-specific regulatory T cells and promotes immunologic tolerance.

Authors:  Andrea Annoni; Brian D Brown; Alessio Cantore; Lucia Sergi Sergi; Luigi Naldini; Maria-Grazia Roncarolo
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Manipulating piggyBac transposon chromosomal integration site selection in human cells.

Authors:  Claudia Kettlun; Daniel L Galvan; Alfred L George; Aparna Kaja; Matthew H Wilson
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 11.454

6.  Adaptive immunity suppresses formation and progression of diethylnitrosamine-induced liver cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Schneider; Andreas Teufel; Tetyana Yevsa; Frank Staib; Anja Hohmeyer; Gudrun Walenda; Henning W Zimmermann; Mihael Vucur; Sebastian Huss; Nikolaus Gassler; Hermann E Wasmuth; Sergio A Lira; Lars Zender; Tom Luedde; Christian Trautwein; Frank Tacke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Somatic integration and long-term transgene expression in normal and haemophilic mice using a DNA transposon system.

Authors:  S R Yant; L Meuse; W Chiu; Z Ivics; Z Izsvak; M A Kay
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Increased maintenance and persistence of transgenes by excision of expression cassettes from plasmid sequences in vivo.

Authors:  Efren Riu; Dirk Grimm; Zan Huang; Mark A Kay
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.695

9.  The efficacy and the risk of immunogenicity of FIX Padua (R338L) in hemophilia B dogs treated by AAV muscle gene therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan D Finn; Timothy C Nichols; Nikolaos Svoronos; Elizabeth P Merricks; Dwight A Bellenger; Shangshen Zhou; Paolo Simioni; Katherine A High; Valder R Arruda
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Silencing of episomal transgene expression by plasmid bacterial DNA elements in vivo.

Authors:  Z Y Chen; C Y He; L Meuse; M A Kay
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.250

View more
  27 in total

1.  Moving forward toward a cure for hemophilia B.

Authors:  Thierry VandenDriessche; Marinee K Chuah
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Rational design for enhanced gene therapy with DNA transposons.

Authors:  Perry B Hackett; Elena L Aronovich
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  Endogenous Transposase Source in Human Cells Mobilizes piggyBac Transposons.

Authors:  Zoltán Ivics
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Hyperactive Factor IX Padua: A Game-Changer for Hemophilia Gene Therapy.

Authors:  Thierry VandenDriessche; Marinee K Chuah
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  Autologous Cell Therapy Approach for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy using PiggyBac Transposons and Mesoangioblasts.

Authors:  Pavithra S Iyer; Lionel O Mavoungou; Flavio Ronzoni; Joanna Zemla; Emanuel Schmid-Siegert; Stefania Antonini; Laurence A Neff; Olivier M Dorchies; Marisa Jaconi; Malgorzata Lekka; Graziella Messina; Nicolas Mermod
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 6.  piggyBac-ing models and new therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Lauren E Woodard; Matthew H Wilson
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 19.536

7.  A rational mouse model to detect on-target, off-tumor CAR T cell toxicity.

Authors:  Mauro Castellarin; Caroline Sands; Tong Da; John Scholler; Kathleen Graham; Elizabeth Buza; Joseph A Fraietta; Yangbing Zhao; Carl H June
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-07-23

8.  Gene therapy for hemophilia B using CB 2679d-GT: a novel factor IX variant with higher potency than factor IX Padua.

Authors:  Nisha Nair; Dries De Wolf; Phuong Anh Nguyen; Quang Hong Pham; Ermira Samara-Kuko; Jeff Landau; Grant E Blouse; Marinee K Chuah; Thierry VandenDriessche
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Endoscopic-mediated, biliary hydrodynamic injection mediating clinically relevant levels of gene delivery in pig liver.

Authors:  Robert L Kruse; Yuting Huang; Thomas Shum; Lu Bai; Hui Ding; Zack Z Wang; Florin M Selaru; Vivek Kumbhari
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Novel vectors and approaches for gene therapy in liver diseases.

Authors:  Sheila Maestro; Nicholas D Weber; Nerea Zabaleta; Rafael Aldabe; Gloria Gonzalez-Aseguinolaza
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2021-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.