| Literature DB >> 25033201 |
Lufeng Qie1, Guanqing Jia2, Wenying Zhang3, James Schnable2, Zhonglin Shang4, Wei Li5, Binhui Liu3, Mingzhe Li3, Yang Chai2, Hui Zhi2, Xianmin Diao6.
Abstract
Drought tolerance is an important breeding target for enhancing the yields of grain crop species in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Two species of Setaria, domesticated foxtail millet (S. italica) and its wild ancestor green foxtail (S. viridis) are becoming widely adopted as models for functional genomics studies in the Panicoid grasses. In this study, the genomic regions controlling germination and early seedling drought tolerance in Setaria were identified using 190 F7 lines derived from a cross between Yugu1, a S. italica cultivar developed in China, and a wild S. viridis genotype collected from Uzbekistan. Quantitative trait loci were identified which contribute to a number of traits including promptness index, radical root length, coleoptile length and lateral root number at germinating stage and seedling survival rate was characterized by the ability of desiccated seedlings to revive after rehydration. A genetic map with 128 SSR markers which spans 1293.9 cM with an average of 14 markers per linkage group of the 9 linkage groups was constructed. A total of eighteen QTLs were detected which included nine that explained over 10% of the phenotypic variance for a given trait. Both the wild green foxtail genotype and the foxtail millet cultivar contributed the favorite alleles for traits detected in this trial, indicating that wild Setaria viridis populations may serve as a reservoir for novel stress tolerance alleles which could be employed in foxtail millet breeding.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25033201 PMCID: PMC4102488 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Seed germination and seedling related trait values for S.italica and S.viridis parents and recombinant inbred lines (RILs) under diverse treatments.
| Traits |
|
| RIL mean | RIL range | ||
| Promptness index | Control | PI_C | 2.05 | 2.48 | 2.22±0.34 | 0.37∼2.50 |
| PEG6000 Osmotic | PI_S | 0.85 | 0.73 | 1.16±0.32 | 0.05∼1.91 | |
| Radical root length (mm) | Control | RL_C | 9.00 | 7.60 | 10.01±1.58 | 5.70∼15.30 |
| PEG6000 Osmotic | RL_S | 0.60 | 1.50 | 1.29±0.59 | 0.00∼4.40 | |
| Coleoptile length (mm) | Control | CL_C | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.57±0.73 | 0.40∼4.50 |
| PEG6000 Osmotic | CL_S | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.53±0.24 | 0.00∼1.20 | |
| Lateral root number | Control | LRN_C | 9 | 4 | 12.1±5.2 | 0∼26 |
| PEG6000 Osmotic | LRN_S | 2 | 2 | 0.9±1.0 | 0∼7 | |
| Germination stress tolerance index | GSI_D | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.52±0.12 | 0.09∼0.79 | |
| Survival rate | SR_D | 0.65 | 0.90 | 0.61±0.16 | 0.08∼0.93 | |
| Radical root length decrease (mm) | RLD_D | 8.40 | 6.10 | 8.70±1.64 | 4.80∼14.30 | |
| Radical root length relative | RLR_D | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.13±0.06 | 0.00∼0.43 | |
| Radical root length index | RLI_D | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.87±0.06 | 0.57∼1.00 | |
| Coleoptile length decrease (mm) | CLD_D | 2.30 | 2.50 | 2.00±0.68 | 0.40∼3.80 | |
| Coleoptile length relative | CLR_D | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.21±0.10 | 0.00∼0.64 | |
| Coleoptile length index | CLI_D | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.79±0.10 | 0.36∼1.00 | |
| Lateral root number decrease | LRND_D | 7 | 2 | 11.0±5.2 | 0∼26 | |
| Lateral root number relative | LRNR_D | 0.22 | 0.50 | 0.09±0.13 | 0∼1 | |
| Lateral root number index | LRNI_D | 0.78 | 0.50 | 0.91±0.13 | 0∼1 | |
Figure 1Heritability of germination (A) and morphological (B) traits measured under both normal and PEG6000 osmotic conditions.
Figure 2Genetic linkage map constructed using 128 SSR markers.
Black lines represent QTLs detected in this trial; Solid rhombuses represent skewed markers (Regions) detected in this population and two other recombinant inbred line populations (see ), number of rhombuses means number of populations identified segregating deviation in target regions.
Significant QTLs detected in RIL populations.
| Category | QTL | Trait | Chromosome | Peak (cM) | Peak LOD | Left boundary (cM) | Right boundary (cM) |
|
|
| Control | QCL_C_5A | CL_C | 5 | 66.1 | 4.45 | 52.0 | 76.0 | −0.25 | 0.11 |
| QRL_C_7A | RL_C | 7 | 196.3 | 2.51 | 195.2 | 197.4 | 0.42 | 0.07 | |
| QRL_C_2A | RL_C | 2 | 11.0 | 4.18 | 0.8 | 19.9 | −0.52 | 0.10 | |
| QLRN_C_7A | LRN_C | 7 | 179.4 | 4.44 | 170.0 | 187.5 | 1.63 | 0.10 | |
| QPI_C_1A | PI_C | 1 | 39.9 | 2.93 | 36.1 | 40.3 | 0.11 | 0.07 | |
| PEG6000 Osmotic | QLRN_S_3A | LRN_S | 3 | 55.2 | 2.65 | 53.9 | 56.4 | −0.30 | 0.06 |
| QLRN_S_9A | LRN_S | 9 | 65.1 | 3.27 | 49.1 | 75.6 | −0.41 | 0.12 | |
| QPI_S_7A | PI_S | 7 | 150.8 | 2.74 | 143.8 | 157.5 | 0.10 | 0.09 | |
| Drought tolerance-related | QGSI_D_7A | GSI_D | 7 | 154.1 | 3.91 | 141.2 | 174.1 | 0.05 | 0.14 |
| QCLD_D_1A | CLD_D | 1 | 85.5 | 3.12 | 79.6 | 86.9 | 0.18 | 0.07 | |
| QCLD_D_1B | CLD_D | 1 | 100.8 | 2.95 | 95.7 | 109.2 | 0.22 | 0.10 | |
| QCLD_D_5A | CLD_D | 5 | 63.9 | 3.47 | 54.0 | 74.1 | −0.20 | 0.09 | |
| QCLR_D_6A | CLR_D | 6 | 37.7 | 2.71 | 36.3 | 38.2 | 0.02 | 0.06 | |
| QCLI_D_6A | CLI_D | 6 | 37.7 | 2.71 | 36.3 | 38.2 | −0.02 | 0.06 | |
| QRLD_D_9A | RLD_D | 9 | 89.6 | 3.16 | 78.7 | 100.6 | −0.58 | 0.12 | |
| QLRND_D_7A | LRND_D | 7 | 179.0 | 4.32 | 170.3 | 186.7 | 1.65 | 0.10 | |
| QLRNR_D_9A | LRNR_D | 9 | 26.3 | 2.77 | 25.2 | 26.7 | −0.14 | 0.06 | |
| QSR_D_1A | SR_D | 1 | 10.4 | 3.99 | 0.2 | 19.8 | 0.61 | 0.13 |
a: Positive values means favorite alleles were contributed by female parent Yugu1; Negative values means favorite alleles were contributed by male parent W53.