Literature DB >> 20525798

Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat.

Delphine Fleury1, Stephen Jefferies, Haydn Kuchel, Peter Langridge.   

Abstract

Tolerance to drought is a quantitative trait, with a complex phenotype, often confounded by plant phenology. Breeding for drought tolerance is further complicated since several types of abiotic stress, such as high temperatures, high irradiance, and nutrient toxicities or deficiencies can challenge crop plants simultaneously. Although marker-assisted selection is now widely deployed in wheat, it has not contributed significantly to cultivar improvement for adaptation to low-yielding environments and breeding has relied largely on direct phenotypic selection for improved performance in these difficult environments. The limited success of the physiological and molecular breeding approaches now suggests that a careful rethink is needed of our strategies in order to understand better and breed for drought tolerance. A research programme for increasing drought tolerance of wheat should tackle the problem in a multi-disciplinary approach, considering interaction between multiple stresses and plant phenology, and integrating the physiological dissection of drought-tolerance traits and the genetic and genomics tools, such as quantitative trait loci (QTL), microarrays, and transgenic crops. In this paper, recent advances in the genetics and genomics of drought tolerance in wheat and barley are reviewed and used as a base for revisiting approaches to analyse drought tolerance in wheat. A strategy is then described where a specific environment is targeted and appropriate germplasm adapted to the chosen environment is selected, based on extensive definition of the morpho-physiological and molecular mechanisms of tolerance of the parents. This information was used to create structured populations and develop models for QTL analysis and positional cloning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20525798     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  102 in total

1.  Genomic associations for drought tolerance on the short arm of wheat chromosome 4B.

Authors:  Suhas Kadam; Kalpana Singh; Sanyukta Shukla; Sonia Goel; Prashant Vikram; Vasantrao Pawar; Kishor Gaikwad; Renu Khanna-Chopra; Nagendra Singh
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.410

Review 2.  A systems biology perspective on the role of WRKY transcription factors in drought responses in plants.

Authors:  Prateek Tripathi; Roel C Rabara; Paul J Rushton
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  The E3 Ligase TaSAP5 Alters Drought Stress Responses by Promoting the Degradation of DRIP Proteins.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Yujing Yin; Xinye Liu; Shaoming Tong; Jiewen Xing; Yuan Zhang; Ramesh N Pudake; Edenys Miranda Izquierdo; Huiru Peng; Mingming Xin; Zhaorong Hu; Zhongfu Ni; Qixin Sun; Yingyin Yao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Genome-wide association mapping of yield and yield components of spring wheat under contrasting moisture regimes.

Authors:  Erena A Edae; Patrick F Byrne; Scott D Haley; Marta S Lopes; Matthew P Reynolds
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  QTLs for cell wall-bound phenolics in relation to the photosynthetic apparatus activity and leaf water status under drought stress at different growth stages of triticale.

Authors:  Tomasz Hura; Mirosław Tyrka; Katarzyna Hura; Agnieszka Ostrowska; Kinga Dziurka
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 6.  The potential of transcription factor-based genetic engineering in improving crop tolerance to drought.

Authors:  Roel C Rabara; Prateek Tripathi; Paul J Rushton
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2014-08-13

7.  Systems responses to progressive water stress in durum wheat.

Authors:  Dimah Z Habash; Marcela Baudo; Matthew Hindle; Stephen J Powers; Michael Defoin-Platel; Rowan Mitchell; Mansoor Saqi; Chris Rawlings; Kawther Latiri; Jose L Araus; Ahmad Abdulkader; Roberto Tuberosa; David W Lawlor; Miloudi M Nachit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Components of Water Use Efficiency Have Unique Genetic Signatures in the Model C4 Grass Setaria.

Authors:  Max J Feldman; Patrick Z Ellsworth; Noah Fahlgren; Malia A Gehan; Asaph B Cousins; Ivan Baxter
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Unravelling Differences in Candidate Genes for Drought Tolerance in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) by Use of New Functional Microsatellite Markers.

Authors:  Christina Schumacher; Christoph Tim Krannich; Lisa Maletzki; Karin Köhl; Joachim Kopka; Heike Sprenger; Dirk Karl Hincha; Sylvia Seddig; Rolf Peters; Sadia Hamera; Ellen Zuther; Manuela Haas; Renate Horn
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 10.  Emerging tools, concepts and ideas to track the modulator genes underlying plant drought adaptive traits: An overview.

Authors:  Parvathi Ms; Karaba N Nataraja
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.