Literature DB >> 25030986

Predator-induced flow disturbances alert prey, from the onset of an attack.

Jérôme Casas1, Thomas Steinmann2.   

Abstract

Many prey species, from soil arthropods to fish, perceive the approach of predators, allowing them to escape just in time. Thus, prey capture is as important to predators as prey finding. We extend an existing framework for understanding the conjoint trajectories of predator and prey after encounters, by estimating the ratio of predator attack and prey danger perception distances, and apply it to wolf spiders attacking wood crickets. Disturbances to air flow upstream from running spiders, which are sensed by crickets, were assessed by computational fluid dynamics with the finite-elements method for a much simplified spider model: body size, speed and ground effect were all required to obtain a faithful representation of the aerodynamic signature of the spider, with the legs making only a minor contribution. The relationship between attack speed and the maximal distance at which the cricket can perceive the danger is parabolic; it splits the space defined by these two variables into regions differing in their values for this ratio. For this biological interaction, the ratio is no greater than one, implying immediate perception of the danger, from the onset of attack. Particular attention should be paid to the ecomechanical aspects of interactions with such small ratio, because of the high degree of bidirectional coupling of the behaviour of the two protagonists. This conclusion applies to several other predator-prey systems with sensory ecologies based on flow sensing, in air and water.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  danger perception; flow sensing; ground effect; predator–prey interactions; sensory ecology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25030986      PMCID: PMC4123705          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Responses of cricket cercal interneurons to realistic naturalistic stimuli in the field.

Authors:  Fabienne Dupuy; Thomas Steinmann; Dominique Pierre; Jean-Philippe Christidès; Graham Cummins; Claudio Lazzari; John Miller; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Quantitative analysis of tethered and free-swimming copepodid flow fields.

Authors:  Kimberly B Catton; Donald R Webster; Jason Brown; Jeannette Yen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Response of cricket and spider motion-sensing hairs to airflow pulsations.

Authors:  R Kant; J A C Humphrey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Volumetric quantification of fluid flow reveals fish's use of hydrodynamic stealth to capture evasive prey.

Authors:  Brad J Gemmell; Deepak Adhikari; Ellen K Longmire
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  The cricket cercal system implements delay-line processing.

Authors:  Jonas Mulder-Rosi; Graham I Cummins; John P Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Animal escapology I: theoretical issues and emerging trends in escape trajectories.

Authors:  Paolo Domenici; Jonathan M Blagburn; Jonathan P Bacon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Confronting the physiological bottleneck: A challenge from ecomechanics.

Authors:  Mark Denny; Brian Helmuth
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Biomechanics: deadly strike mechanism of a mantis shrimp.

Authors:  S N Patek; W L Korff; R L Caldwell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs.

Authors:  A M Wilson; J C Lowe; K Roskilly; P E Hudson; K A Golabek; J W McNutt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Omnidirectional sensory and motor volumes in electric fish.

Authors:  James B Snyder; Mark E Nelson; Joel W Burdick; Malcolm A Maciver
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  8 in total

1.  A faster escape does not enhance survival in zebrafish larvae.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Christy Nguyen; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Going with the flow: hydrodynamic cues trigger directed escapes from a stalking predator.

Authors:  Lillian J Tuttle; H Eve Robinson; Daisuke Takagi; J Rudi Strickler; Petra H Lenz; Daniel K Hartline
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The morphological heterogeneity of cricket flow-sensing hairs conveys the complex flow signature of predator attacks.

Authors:  Thomas Steinmann; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  When Optimal Strategy Matters to Prey Fish.

Authors:  Alberto Soto; William J Stewart; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  Neural Substrates of Drosophila Larval Anemotaxis.

Authors:  Tihana Jovanic; Michael Winding; Albert Cardona; James W Truman; Marc Gershow; Marta Zlatic
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Encoding of small-scale air motion dynamics in the cricket, Acheta domesticus.

Authors:  Jonas Mulder-Rosi; John P Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Predator and prey functional traits: understanding the adaptive machinery driving predator-prey interactions.

Authors:  Oswald Schmitz
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-09-27

8.  Temperature effects on ballistic prey capture by a dragonfly larva.

Authors:  Estefania Quenta Herrera; Jérôme Casas; Olivier Dangles; Sylvain Pincebourde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.