Literature DB >> 28637919

The morphological heterogeneity of cricket flow-sensing hairs conveys the complex flow signature of predator attacks.

Thomas Steinmann1, Jérôme Casas2.   

Abstract

Arthropod flow-sensing hair length ranges over more than an order of magnitude, from 0.1 to 5 mm. Previous studies repeatedly identified the longest hairs as the most sensitive, but recent studies identified the shortest hairs as the most responsive. We resolved this apparent conflict by proposing a new model, taking into account both the initial and long-term aspects of the flow pattern produced by a lunging predator. After the estimation of the mechanical parameters of hairs, we measured the flow produced by predator mimics and compared the predicted and observed values of hair displacements in this flow. Short and long hairs respond over different time scales during the course of an attack. By harbouring a canopy of hairs of different lengths, forming a continuum, the insect can fractionize these moments. Short hairs are more agile, but are less able to harvest energy from the air. This may result in longer hairs firing their neurons earlier, despite their slower deflection. The complex interplay between hair agility and sensitivity is also modulated by the predator distance and the attack speed, characteristics defining flow properties. We conclude that the morphological heterogeneity of the hair canopy mirrors the flow complexity of an entire attack, from launch to grasp.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; filiform hairs; matched filters; predator–prey interaction; sensory ecology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28637919      PMCID: PMC5493808          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  25 in total

1.  Spider joint hair sensilla: adaptation to proprioreceptive stimulation.

Authors:  Clemens F Schaber; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Arthropod touch reception: structure and mechanics of the basal part of a spider tactile hair.

Authors:  F G Barth; S S Németh; O C Friedrich
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Responses of cricket cercal interneurons to realistic naturalistic stimuli in the field.

Authors:  Fabienne Dupuy; Thomas Steinmann; Dominique Pierre; Jean-Philippe Christidès; Graham Cummins; Claudio Lazzari; John Miller; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  A faster escape does not enhance survival in zebrafish larvae.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Christy Nguyen; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Response of cricket and spider motion-sensing hairs to airflow pulsations.

Authors:  R Kant; J A C Humphrey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Relative contributions of organ shape and receptor arrangement to the design of cricket's cercal system.

Authors:  Olivier Dangles; Thomas Steinmann; Dominique Pierre; Fabrice Vannier; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  A spider's biological vibration filter: micromechanical characteristics of a biomaterial surface.

Authors:  Seth L Young; Marius Chyasnavichyus; Maxim Erko; Friedrich G Barth; Peter Fratzl; Igor Zlotnikov; Yael Politi; Vladimir V Tsukruk
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Micromechanical properties of strain-sensitive lyriform organs of a wandering spider (Cupiennius salei).

Authors:  Seth L Young; Marius Chyasnavichyus; Friedrich G Barth; Igor Zlotnikov; Yael Politi; Vladimir V Tsukruk
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Ultrastructure and mechanical properties of an insect mechanoreceptor: stimulus-transmitting structures and sensory apparatus of the cercal filiform hairs of Gryllus.

Authors:  W Gnatzy; J Tautz
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  A model of filiform hair distribution on the cricket cercus.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Heys; Prathish K Rajaraman; Tomas Gedeon; John P Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Going with the flow: hydrodynamic cues trigger directed escapes from a stalking predator.

Authors:  Lillian J Tuttle; H Eve Robinson; Daisuke Takagi; J Rudi Strickler; Petra H Lenz; Daniel K Hartline
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Encoding of small-scale air motion dynamics in the cricket, Acheta domesticus.

Authors:  Jonas Mulder-Rosi; John P Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Design principles of hair-like structures as biological machines.

Authors:  Madeleine Seale; Cathal Cummins; Ignazio Maria Viola; Enrico Mastropaolo; Naomi Nakayama
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  The mechanics and interactions of electrically sensitive mechanoreceptive hair arrays of arthropods.

Authors:  Ryan A Palmer; Isaac V Chenchiah; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.118

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.